 | | American History American History Forum - United States, Canada, Mexico, Central and South America |
April 30th, 2012, 06:09 AM
|
#51 | | Archivist
Joined: Apr 2012 From: Harlingen, Texas Posts: 183 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Azita Ahh sorry, is that another one of the hidden forum rules, my mistake, sorry again. |
Yeah, it's some New Year's Resolution thing. We can't talk about current administrations or politics that start after the December of 1991! That's as far as I know. I just barely got here about a month ago on this forum.
| | |
| |
April 30th, 2012, 09:40 AM
|
#52 | | Historian
Joined: Dec 2011 From: Texas Posts: 1,833 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinobu Sensui Which is a shame considering alot of our 19th century Presidents are our best when compared to the more warmongering, political appeasers, and butcher Presidents of the 20th century. | No need to hold back, tell us what you really think.
Anyway, I don't think your characterization of the 19th century Presidents is all that correct. They were just as bad about jumping into war then as the 20th century guys. Quite possibly worse. Always searching for glory and believing they would find it by killing others on a battlefield.
| | |
| |
April 30th, 2012, 09:53 AM
|
#53 | | Scholar
Joined: Apr 2011 From: Finland Posts: 537 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltis No need to hold back, tell us what you really think.
Anyway, I don't think your characterization of the 19th century Presidents is all that correct. They were just as bad about jumping into war then as the 20th century guys. Quite possibly worse. Always searching for glory and believing they would find it by killing others on a battlefield. | You mean sending other people into battlefields. | | |
| |
April 30th, 2012, 05:19 PM
|
#54 | | Archivist
Joined: Apr 2012 From: Harlingen, Texas Posts: 183 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltis No need to hold back, tell us what you really think.
Anyway, I don't think your characterization of the 19th century Presidents is all that correct. They were just as bad about jumping into war then as the 20th century guys. Quite possibly worse. Always searching for glory and believing they would find it by killing others on a battlefield. |
You know you're right! Let's make a list!
Andrew Jackson
Abraham Lincoln (wait's for the flame war to happen)
James Polk
William McKinley
Am I missing someone?  Who else started unnecessary wars?
| | |
| |
April 30th, 2012, 08:17 PM
|
#55 | | Lecturer
Joined: Dec 2011 From: Central USA Posts: 452 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinobu Sensui You know you're right! Let's make a list!
Andrew Jackson
Abraham Lincoln (wait's for the flame war to happen)
James Polk
William McKinley
Am I missing someone?  Who else started unnecessary wars? | I am remembering something about the first Adams administration putting new navy ships to the test against the French fleet. I don't know whether many Americans were killed in that action, but sadly the list begins with the second American President.
| | |
| |
April 30th, 2012, 09:00 PM
|
#56 | | Epicurean
Joined: Mar 2009 From: Texas Posts: 23,810 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Kotromanic I am remembering something about the first Adams administration putting new navy ships to the test against the French fleet. I don't know whether many Americans were killed in that action, but sadly the list begins with the second American President. | President Washington saddled the US with the Jay Treaty, Napoleon's actions
and the Quasi-War with France, led to President Adams requesting the
construction of Navy of 54 ships. Among the six frigates was the Constitution.
The Quasi-War was over pretty quickly with a small amount of US sailors losing
their lives. Most of the action was the US chasing off French privateers. This 'war' was
more of a defensive measure, not conquest, of US shipping
The new US Navy
was expensive, as James Madison predicted, and the taxes raised by Adams to pay for the navy
helped cost him re-election to Jefferson. When Jefferson becomes president, he drastically
reduced the size of the navy & cut internal taxes & wanted to remain neutral.
| | |
| |
May 1st, 2012, 02:05 AM
|
#57 | | OBLIVIOUS
Joined: Dec 2011 From: Ohio Posts: 5,251 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinobu Sensui ...
Abraham Lincoln (wait's for the flame war to happen)
...
Who else started unnecessary wars? | Hmmm. Well this thread is about the most obscure Presidents, and I hardly think Lincoln qualifies. Why don't you start a new thread and tell us how Lincoln started an unnecessary war, and perhaps you'll get your discussion. | | |
| |
May 1st, 2012, 03:34 AM
|
#58 | | Archivist
Joined: Apr 2012 From: Harlingen, Texas Posts: 183 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rongo Hmmm. Well this thread is about the most obscure Presidents, and I hardly think Lincoln qualifies. Why don't you start a new thread and tell us how Lincoln started an unnecessary war, and perhaps you'll get your discussion.  |
Teehee! Sorry!  I forgot the thread I was in!
I think I'll follow you up on that very soon though. ;-)
| | |
| |
May 1st, 2012, 03:56 AM
|
#59 | | OBLIVIOUS
Joined: Dec 2011 From: Ohio Posts: 5,251 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinobu Sensui Teehee! Sorry!  I forgot the thread I was in!
I think I'll follow you up on that very soon though. ;-) | OK. I'll keep an eye out for it!
| | |
| |
May 1st, 2012, 04:50 AM
|
#60 | | Historian
Joined: Mar 2012 From: New Amsterdam Posts: 1,640 |
James K. Polk isn't too well known. I find that strange considering it was under him that Texas, the Oregon territory and Mexican cession occurred. He made good on his promise to stretch us to the pacific, though he isn't talked about too much. Perhaps it was his unsavory tactics that keeps us from talking about him too much.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |