 | | American History American History Forum - United States, Canada, Mexico, Central and South America |
July 11th, 2011, 01:31 AM
|
#1 | | vincit omnia veritas
Joined: Feb 2011 From: England Posts: 4,011 | Confederacy, What else did it do
OK the question of slavery has been debated here again and again, but did the Confederacy actually do anything good? So come on you supporters of the South, what was so good about it?
| | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 01:34 AM
|
#2 | | Cutting your grass
Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 5,676 |
The south was and still is full of deep fried goodness | | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 01:41 AM
|
#3 | | Lecturer
Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 471 |
The only good thing the confederacy did in my opinion was speed the abolition of slavery by several decades. Had it not occurred I think we would have been well into the industrial revolution before slavery was abolished.
| | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 01:57 AM
|
#4 | | King of the Seas!
Joined: Nov 2010 From: Border of GA and AL Posts: 7,889 |
Was Egyptian cotton of finer quality than cotton from the South? If so it certainly helped Egypt's economy. And possibly India. | | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 04:03 AM
|
#5 | | Son of the Morning Star
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The state that is...Round on both ends and Hi in the middle Posts: 2,533 |
There are (hundreds,thousands?) who became famous (in a positive way) as a result of the ACW. I don't think the south had as many, but the south certainly played a part in advancing several people's carrers.
Grant = president
Sherman = General of the Army
Lincoln = may have just been another name on a list of presidents
Custer = not always painted these days in a positive light, but famous in his day due to the ACW
Lee = although lost, he was noted as an honorable man, and excellent leader and his name is still well known
Stonewall Jackson = dies in the war, but his name came out in a very positive manner...some even say he may have turned Gettysburg and added time to the South's fight.
I'm sure there are many more and I am looking for help on more positive results for men of the south from our southerners here.
| | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 04:32 AM
|
#6 | | Southern Unionist
Joined: Aug 2010 From: VA Posts: 5,244 | Quote: |
some even say he may have turned Gettysburg and added time to the South's fight.
| Which is about as useful as speculating on what would happen if Lee had B-52s at Gettysburg. | | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 04:32 AM
|
#7 | | With the Ball People
Joined: Feb 2011 From: Amelia, Virginia, USA Posts: 2,603 | Quote:
Originally Posted by jegates There are (hundreds,thousands?) who became famous (in a positive way) as a result of the ACW. I don't think the south had as many, but the south certainly played a part in advancing several people's carrers.
Grant = president
Sherman = General of the Army
Lincoln = may have just been another name on a list of presidents
Custer = not always painted these days in a positive light, but famous in his day due to the ACW
Lee = although lost, he was noted as an honorable man, and excellent leader and his name is still well known
Stonewall Jackson = dies in the war, but his name came out in a very positive manner...some even say he may have turned Gettysburg and added time to the South's fight.
I'm sure there are many more and I am looking for help on more positive results for men of the south from our southerners here. | I agree with the list, but ascribing these as positives for the Confederacy is rather like saying one positive for Nazi Germany is President Eisenhower. Sure, it gave a boost to his career, but unintended effects on personal careers as a result of war isn't much of a positive, all things considered.
The problem with the OP is that the Confederacy lasted barely 4 years, and lived and died almost entirely within war. There simply wasn't time for science and literature or anything else to emerge. We could list ironclads, submersibles and that sort of thing, but everything will be related to war, as that was the context.
| | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 04:39 AM
|
#8 | | Son of the Morning Star
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The state that is...Round on both ends and Hi in the middle Posts: 2,533 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Viperlord Which is about as useful as speculating on what would happen if Lee had B-52s at Gettysburg.  |
Good one... | | |
| |
July 11th, 2011, 04:41 AM
|
#9 | | Son of the Morning Star
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The state that is...Round on both ends and Hi in the middle Posts: 2,533 | Quote:
Originally Posted by botully I agree with the list, but ascribing these as positives for the Confederacy is rather like saying one positive for Nazi Germany is President Eisenhower. Sure, it gave a boost to his career, but unintended effects on personal careers as a result of war isn't much of a positive, all things considered.
The problem with the OP is that the Confederacy lasted barely 4 years, and lived and died almost entirely within war. There simply wasn't time for science and literature or anything else to emerge. We could list ironclads, submersibles and that sort of thing, but everything will be related to war, as that was the context. |
Good point and probably should be (or maybe already has been) a new thread. Does anything good come from a war? Or, since so many die and suffer, is it similar to buying someone a gift by using drug money?
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |