Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > American History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

American History American History Forum - United States, Canada, Mexico, Central and South America


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 3rd, 2011, 04:22 PM   #11

jegates's Avatar
Son of the Morning Star
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: The state that is...Round on both ends and Hi in the middle
Posts: 2,613

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salah View Post
I'm inclined to fully agree with you. Some Abolitionists claimed it was their duty to help "civilize" the blacks, and serve as a guiding hand to them - operating under the assumption they were too stupid to function unaided.

Thanks Salah...it's a shame we have to go through so much to accept others. Imagine there's...wait, about to break into a song...
jegates is offline  
Remove Ads
Old December 3rd, 2011, 05:23 PM   #12

tjadams's Avatar
Epicurean
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Texas
Posts: 24,311
Blog Entries: 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by jegates View Post
I think almost everybody (North and South) during the 1860s would be labled a racist by today's definition..
One has to look no further than by Lincoln's own mouth in his
debates with Senator Douglas for more confusion on the issue
of race.
tjadams is online now  
Old December 3rd, 2011, 08:46 PM   #13

skizzerflake's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 1,821

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjadams View Post
One has to look no further than by Lincoln's own mouth in his debates with Senator Douglas for more confusion on the issue
of race.
And, a lot of abolitionists assumed that the freed slaves would be sent "back" to Africa (where? Liberia?), in spite of the fact that most slaves were born in America, some had roots here as long as 200 years before and many didn't even know what part of Africa they had come from. We're still evolving on issues that surround race, but not much evolution had occurred back in 1860.
skizzerflake is offline  
Old December 3rd, 2011, 09:55 PM   #14

oshron's Avatar
Rplegacy Emperor
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: western Terranova
Posts: 3,282

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salah View Post
Lee was probably not a racist by how that word would have been defined in the 19th Century. I've read that he disliked the institution of slavery, but his loyalty to Virginia outweighed his moral convictions.
personally, i think that was the case with most confederates, especially since most of the confederate soldiers probably didnt own slaves
Quote:
Originally Posted by jegates View Post
I think almost everybody (North and South) during the 1860s would be labled a racist by today's definition. Even if a person was against slavery at the time, more than likely they still felt superior to blacks.

Lee was most likely no exception.
agreed
oshron is offline  
Old December 4th, 2011, 04:46 AM   #15

Viperlord's Avatar
Southern Unionist
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: VA
Posts: 5,321
Blog Entries: 12

Lee's attitude was typical of the period. He spoke against slavery as an abstract evil, but nevertheless owned slaves himself and had at least one I'm aware of beaten for trying to escape. Lee and many other southerners seemed to believe slavery to be the will of their god, and Lee also railed against abolitionists for their open opposition to the institution.
Viperlord is online now  
Old December 4th, 2011, 07:14 AM   #16

tjadams's Avatar
Epicurean
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Texas
Posts: 24,311
Blog Entries: 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by skizzerflake View Post
And, a lot of abolitionists assumed that the freed slaves would be sent "back" to Africa (where? Liberia?), in spite of the fact that most slaves were born in America, some had roots here as long as 200 years before and many didn't even know what part of Africa they had come from. We're still evolving on issues that surround race, but not much evolution had occurred back in 1860.
Lincoln supported for a long time the <1816> American Colonization Society, which was the relocation of freed slaves. He later changed his mind.
tjadams is online now  
Old December 4th, 2011, 11:36 AM   #17
Historian
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,280

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viperlord View Post
Lee's attitude was typical of the period. He spoke against slavery as an abstract evil, but nevertheless owned slaves himself and had at least one I'm aware of beaten for trying to escape. Lee and many other southerners seemed to believe slavery to be the will of their god, and Lee also railed against abolitionists for their open opposition to the institution.
Yeh, it is a myth that Lee was anti-slavery.

It would have been very hard for Lee to lead on invasion of his own state.

He was in a difficult position for various reasons since his wife's plantation was just accross from Washington. The Union used his land to bury the war dead. His descendents eventually sued and were compensated. The land would be worth several billon $s today.

There was very mixed feelings in VA and all the slave states that seceeded after Fort Sumpter or did not seceed. In the deep south, there was a booming economy based on cotton and slavery. VA was partly an industrial state and many of the slaves had been sold down the river to the big cotton plantations in the deep south. Slavery, other economic issues, and cultural differences with the north were not as important as in the cotton states. The upper south was forced to take sides. The VA session convention initially voted 2-1 against secession, but seceeded rather than allow the Union arny to pass through VA.

Last edited by betgo; December 4th, 2011 at 11:43 AM.
betgo is offline  
Old December 5th, 2011, 05:45 AM   #18

Vintersorg's Avatar
Pseudo-American
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,701
Blog Entries: 4

Robert E. Lee once wrote in a letter:
"There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil."

But he did not consider slavery and slaves worth fighting a war over.
He joined the Southern Cause, because his only goal was the defense of his beloved State of virginia.
Vintersorg is offline  
Old December 5th, 2011, 07:36 AM   #19

dschardt's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Nebraska
Posts: 358

Well the one thing you can say about the man is that he is generally respected today as he was in his day. That says enough to me about the man.

I was at Arlington a couple of summers ago and his house was falling apart, hopefully they raised enough money to renovate the thing. I cannot begin to fathom how hard it would have been to live so close to the city that housed his enemy, and represented the country he loved.
dschardt is offline  
Old December 5th, 2011, 03:07 PM   #20
Historian
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,280

Quote:
Originally Posted by dschardt View Post
Well the one thing you can say about the man is that he is generally respected today as he was in his day. That says enough to me about the man.

I was at Arlington a couple of summers ago and his house was falling apart, hopefully they raised enough money to renovate the thing. I cannot begin to fathom how hard it would have been to live so close to the city that housed his enemy, and represented the country he loved.
Lee's home and most of what is now the VA suburbs of DC was seized by the Union at the beginning of the war. He was away in the Confederate army, so he didn't look down from Arlington House on the capital once the war started.

The weird thing is that when Lee sided with the Confederacy, he knew the Union would probably take his plantation right away. However, it would have been hard to lead an invasion of his home state.

Lee was definitely antisecession. Don't know if he was really antislavery or that he didn't believe in the Confederate cause.
betgo is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > American History

Tags
lee, robert


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Robert E. Lee WHAT IF mister Speculative History 8 May 10th, 2009 05:17 AM
Robert E. Lee kahn American History 33 March 20th, 2009 07:40 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.