Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > American History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

American History American History Forum - United States, Canada, Mexico, Central and South America


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 9th, 2012, 06:43 PM   #21
Academician
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 75

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjadams View Post
I know the film suffered from an early rotation of directors.
Overall, I liked the film. It focused more on the lives of the men and not so much on
the battle & it didn't go overboard in attempting to be a message movie or loaded with fluffy patriotism or racism.
It was miscast, over budget, overscripted, went through too many drafts.

Was supposed to be an R rated reality, a saving private ryan, braveheart epic.

Ended up being a b-team flick, one of the biggest box office bombs of the last 50 years.

It should've been very good.
Alamo is offline  
Remove Ads
Old March 9th, 2012, 06:48 PM   #22

tjadams's Avatar
Epicurean
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Texas
Posts: 23,825
Blog Entries: 35

I'm glad it wasn't bloody, gory and ampt'd up. When given the green light
to do that, Hollywood goes overboard and gores for gore sake.
tjadams is online now  
Old March 9th, 2012, 06:50 PM   #23
Academician
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 75

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjadams View Post
I'm glad it wasn't bloody, gory and ampt'd up. When given the green light
to do that, Hollywood goes overboard and gores for gore sake.
It was supposed to be directd by Ron Howard, Russell Crowe was attached to play Bowie or Crockett, I don't remember which.

It was a much grander film in scope at the start.

I doubt Howard would've initiated a gorefest.
Alamo is offline  
Old March 10th, 2012, 04:47 PM   #24

glorybound's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Feb 2012
From: Indiana
Posts: 608

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjadams View Post
Click the image to open in full size.Click the image to open in full size.
Thank you for posting these great graphics.

Lee
glorybound is offline  
Old March 10th, 2012, 05:10 PM   #25

tjadams's Avatar
Epicurean
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Texas
Posts: 23,825
Blog Entries: 35

^ You're most welcome Glory.
The artwork of Gary Zaboly is amazing.
Click the image to open in full size.Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.

Amazon.com: Blood of Noble Men (9781571688927): Alan C. Huffines, Gary S. Zaboly: Books
Amazon.com: Blood of Noble Men (9781571688927): Alan C. Huffines, Gary S. Zaboly: Books

tjadams is online now  
Old March 10th, 2012, 11:28 PM   #26

Greyter's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: Texas
Posts: 902

Whatever you may think about the Battle, and all of the not so subtle missing information about the final outcome, one thing can not be denied.

In March of the year 1836, some 180+ individuals, not goaded nor threaghtened by a higher power, made a stand.

180 against 1000's, It can not be denied.
Greyter is offline  
Old March 11th, 2012, 12:39 AM   #27

Corto Maltese's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Norway
Posts: 402

Yes let us remember the great Mexican victory at the Alamo


after all if you know your history you should know that it was Mexico that won the battle of Alamo and not Texas
Corto Maltese is offline  
Old March 11th, 2012, 12:45 AM   #28

Greyter's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: Texas
Posts: 902

Let us all remember the last Norwegian victory, at anything. It must have inspired many.
Greyter is offline  
Old March 11th, 2012, 12:54 AM   #29

Corto Maltese's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Norway
Posts: 402

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyter View Post
Let us all remember the last Norwegian victory, at anything. It must have inspired many.

Mexico won the battle of the Alamo this is a fact. You may not like it you may act like a child when sombody tells you. But it was a Mexican victory


this is a historical fact.


and this is a history board where we speak of what actualy happend and not what we wish happend.


and i don`t see what Norway has to do in this thread. But i gues it is better to attack Norway than to say that Mexico did win the battle of the alamo.....
Corto Maltese is offline  
Old March 11th, 2012, 12:59 AM   #30

Greyter's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: Texas
Posts: 902

Of course "Mexico" won the Battle of the Alamo. How could they not ?
Greyter is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > American History

Tags
1836, alamo, march


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
175 Years after the fall of The Alamo jegates American History 296 February 4th, 2012 08:00 PM
Alamo Scouts McGrunt War and Military History 2 October 24th, 2011 06:45 AM
Alamo - why couldn't Santa Ana march around it Robert165 American History 80 March 23rd, 2010 03:55 AM
The Alamo tedkaw American History 35 May 14th, 2009 03:11 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.