 |
August 15th, 2012, 12:29 PM
|
#11 | | Lecturer
Joined: Jul 2012 From: Michigan, USA. Posts: 295 |
Maybe it was because I was only a child then and this is most likely a case of rose-glasses, but I'd like to have lived under Clinton's administration than the ones I've grown in.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 04:42 PM
|
#12 | | Historian
Joined: Jun 2012 From: At present SD, USA Posts: 1,407 |
I'd generally lean toward FDR first and Truman second.
Sometimes the only way we can only learn about the character of a country/nation/people by seeing how they handle great adversity and great change. There is a reason the generation that grew up under FDR (1932-1945) and served under him in WWII (1941-1945) is referred to as the greatest generation.
And things under Truman weren't that bad. WWII was over and much of the prosperity that we associate with the 50s and Eisenhower began under Truman. He gave the GIs the ability to go back to college through the GI Bill. He rebuilt Europe with the help of his Secretary of State George Marshall (former Chief of Staff under FDR).
The only negative under Truman was the Cold War, and that hung over American history through Reagan's Presidency.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 04:47 PM
|
#13 | | Quixotic Jedi
Joined: Apr 2011 From: The True Capital of China Posts: 5,045 |
Johnson, the country changed so much for the better when he was President. I would like to relive that time again.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 04:49 PM
|
#14 | | Rabbit of Wormhole
Joined: Mar 2012 From: In the bag of ecstatic squirt Posts: 7,877 |
Ronald Reagan as the President of the U.S. who's a good friend of Mickael Gorbachev.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 04:50 PM
|
#15 | | ...
Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 24,112 |
Ike and Reagan.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 06:06 PM
|
#16 | | Historian
Joined: Jun 2012 From: Florida Posts: 1,272 |
Having lived through everyone of those presidents since JFK, the best times in my life were under the great Jimmy Carter. He gets my vote.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 06:13 PM
|
#17 | | Scholar
Joined: Mar 2011 From: Over The Hills And Far Away Posts: 887 |
Eisenhower: new infrastructure being built, peace and prosperity at home, and (at least on the surface) society just seemed more polite (though that may just be the nostalgia of the older generations talking).
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 07:51 PM
|
#18 | | With the Ball People
Joined: Feb 2011 From: Amelia, Virginia, USA Posts: 2,613 |
FDR was a great president, but to live under him would have been to live through the depression and then WW2. Hardly good times. I've had enough of unemployment with the 8-10% rate, never mind trying to feed a family with 30% unemployment. Since I lived under the last half of that list, I'll pick Reagan. For me, that actually was good times.
| | |
| |
August 16th, 2012, 08:34 PM
|
#19 | | Scholar
Joined: Jul 2012 From: Florida Posts: 911 |
None of them before cars, planes, & telephones, and lets skip the Depression & the 2 World Wars.
I've lived through them all from LBJ to Obama, not impressed with any of them.
I guess I'll pick Eisenhower. Depression & WWII over, the economy jumping, no ICBMs yet, Yanks, Dodgers and Giants all in NYC, the 52nd St bebop scene, get to watch McCarthy implode... I'd duck going to Korea, though. Yeah, I like Ike. 2nd choice, Teddy R. sounds pretty good.
| | |
| |
August 17th, 2012, 09:19 AM
|
#20 | | Academician
Joined: Aug 2011 From: Ohio Posts: 51 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacuss Yep. Like my ancestors back then, I'd have been poor enough to not know the difference... coal miners and truck farmers, ya know. And it would have been fun watching the "folks up the hill" suddenly have to run around grabbing their asses for a few years. | LOL, Alright I can see that perspective.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |