Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > American History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

American History American History Forum - United States, Canada, Mexico, Central and South America


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 3rd, 2014, 04:36 AM   #31
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,479

There is no doubt about the Zimmerman telegram. It was dumb clumsy and total ineffective diplomacy , Mexico even if inclined posed no threat to the US.

The Germans also sent it on US diplomatic cables, that the Wilson had allowed access to in order to encourage peace negotiations, their use to ferment a US neighbor to attack the US was a gross betrayal of trust that really really rankled Wilson. While not a bit thing from the national US interests perspective, it alienated Wilson at a personal level.
pugsville is offline  
Remove Ads
Old March 3rd, 2014, 05:48 AM   #32

WeisSaul's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2012
From: New Amsterdam
Posts: 2,836

The US shouldn't have joined. We did so because of very very clumsy German diplomacy perhaps bordering on the idiotic.
WeisSaul is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2014, 07:04 AM   #33
Scholar
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 578

Quote:
Originally Posted by skizzerflake View Post
I've never understood what the Germans were thinking when they pestered the US to enter the war. They were doing pretty well in Europe, and could have had much of it, but Zimmerman and submarine warfare against American ships sealed their doom. Goading another country with industrial resources and a large population to enter a war on the other guy's side seems like a metaphor for grandiose idiocy.
The US was a huge supplier of weapons and other goods to the Entente which were also financed by US banks. Today nobody would call such a behaviour neutral.

The only way Germany could try to stop this flow of weapons to the Entente was by unrestricted submarine warfare but it had no chance to distinguish between ships from belligerent and neutral countries. The US had already threatened war in case of Germany declaring a war zone around the Entente in which all shipping, including neutral, would be attacked.

At the same time the US accepted the British at least bending the rules of neutrality as for example by limiting the trade between the USA and neutral European states from where goods might be re-exported to Germany.

As for the Zimmermann telegram, I've never understood why the USA was so upset about it. I mean, it wasn't a secret that the US deliberated declaring war against Germany if the unrestricted submarine warfare was resumed. The note just told the German ambassador to look for an alliance with Mexico in case that the US declared war. What the heck do you expect if you talk about declaring war? That the other side has the decency not to think about how you can be hurt?
Hans321 is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2014, 01:53 PM   #34
Historian
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,862

The Zimmermann telegram was handled badly by Germany in that they didn't understand how weak Mexico was and they should have claimed it was a fabrication when it was released. Also, they should have figured out the British had broken their code. However, it was secret diplomatic communication and they had no reason to think it would ever be made public.

The US always acts like it was attacked or forced into war. This is the case with almost every war in American history, even cases which were obviously wars of aggression. I think it is more interesting to look at the real reasons rather than the official reasons.
betgo is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2014, 05:15 PM   #35

aerial gunner's Avatar
Citizen
 
Joined: Feb 2014
From: USA
Posts: 49

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawnmowerman View Post
I thought another factor was that the Allies looked like they'd loose and as a result be unable to repay their massive war debt to the US.
Well either way the Brits and French (along with Germany) couldn't repay their war debts, which is why the United States brought about the Dawes Plan.
aerial gunner is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2014, 07:27 PM   #36

skizzerflake's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 2,141

Quote:
Originally Posted by betgo View Post
.....The US always acts like it was attacked or forced into war. This is the case with almost every war in American history, even cases which were obviously wars of aggression. I think it is more interesting to look at the real reasons rather than the official reasons.
I don't recall that Wilson's one-man show wanted to be in the war, but even if he/they did, submarine warfare and Zimmerman made justifying it so easy. If the Germans were in trouble and didn't want the US in the war, they certainly screwed that one up.
skizzerflake is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2014, 08:08 PM   #37
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,479

The US position of war debts, the interest charged and the fact they had to paid in US Dollars along with the tariffs that made US dollars hard to get made the US war debts much harder than it could have been.

But those debts were only run up AFTER the US entered the war, while they were some loans raised with US banks before US entry they are not the war debts that people are talking about which were pretty much normal commercial transactions, which the Central powers would have been just as easily able to do (within their finical resources, large British holdings in the US and general finical resources were much greater than German ones) and the US was quite willing for US companies to sell to German or other central powers, as they did with the German Merchant submarines , that fact was it was the British blockade that stopped the central powers from trading effectively with the US, the US was acting in a neutral way.
pugsville is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2014, 11:53 PM   #38
Archivist
 
Joined: Mar 2014
From: North Carolina
Posts: 168

Getting involved in that war was IMO the greatest foreign policy mistake in US history. There was no good reason for the US to get involved in a European war. Over 100,000 American boys lost their lives and what was the outcome?

Britain and France imposed terms which created conditions in Germany that made Hitler politically possible. They also got rid of the Hapsburg empire creating an enormous power vacuum in central/eastern Europe and placed many subject nationalities in countries where they would be a minority and which they had no desire to be a part of without ever bothering to ask those people what they wanted. This sowed the seeds of another world war. Yugoslavia was a mess that could only be held together by a tyrant like Tito, the ethnic Hungarian minorities in Slovakia and Romania has been a source of tension ever since and then there is the matter of the Polish Corridor through Germany and the Sudeten Germans. The Czechs and Slovaks were thrown together in one country and fortunately those tow managed to divorce peacefully unlike most of the other such situations. In short, the vindictiveness of the Britain and France created a disaster.

What would have happened had the US not gotten involved? Likely a stalemate. Yes it would have been bloody and the European countries would likely have been wrecked even worse than they were since it would have gone on but the end result would have been stalemate and the conditions that gave rise to a 2nd world war would not have been created.
FLThunderbird is offline  
Old March 5th, 2014, 11:10 AM   #39
Historian
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Oregon
Posts: 1,832

Quote:
Originally Posted by betgo View Post
Wilson couldn't state that it was due to the influence of foreign agents, financial interests or arms manufacturers.
Indeed. By 1917 Britain had run up an enormous tab, and if stalemated or defeated there'd be no way for powerful creditors to recover those loans. This consideration isn't as dramatic as the Luisitania sinking, or even the Zimmermann telegram, but there's no reason to doubt America's 1% then had just as much pull in Washington as it does now, and was just as willing to use any means - including war - to recover loans, and/or make a tidy profit.

Then there's the Balfour Declaration and machinations surrounding that. Murky business, for sure.
Knarly Dan is offline  
Old March 6th, 2014, 06:44 PM   #40
Citizen
 
Joined: Mar 2014
From: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 30

First off, unrestricted submarine warfare threatened US trade and its allies like Britain. Second, the Zimmermann Telegraph didn't help either. The US would have joined the war even if the above didn't happen because they were always supportive of Britain.
minjaewolfjoy is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > American History

Tags
joined, ww1



Search tags for this page
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just joined Isaac Kappstein New Users 8 November 22nd, 2013 05:53 AM
just joined ricbretz New Users 15 August 26th, 2013 07:48 AM
Just Joined MarkUK New Users 11 August 5th, 2013 12:56 AM
Just joined - hello AncientGardener New Users 19 September 13th, 2012 11:43 PM
Hello everyone, I just joined! mysteryshvitz New Users 21 June 1st, 2010 06:40 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.