 | | Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions |
October 13th, 2006, 10:13 AM
|
#1 | | Lecturer
Joined: Jun 2006 From: Montana Mountains Posts: 254 | which roman emporers would be worth studying?
Any suggestions?
| | |
| |
October 13th, 2006, 12:10 PM
|
#2 | | Lecturer
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 440 |
All of them. Each empreor had their own personality and interesting reigns.
| | |
| |
October 18th, 2006, 07:24 AM
|
#3 | | Citizen
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 9 |
I wouldn't say all of them, not without context anyway. If you're desperate for knowledge and belive all life is spectacular, etc etc then a case could be made for all of them, but many were fairly unimportant (in a historical sense).
My favourites-
Caesar*
Augustus
Nero
Caligula
Germanicus
Tiberius
Nerva
Diocletian
Hadrian
Trajan
Justinian
Constantine (my favourite).
Maybe two dozen or so more. Search "Emperor list" (or similar) for a full list of options.
| | |
| |
October 18th, 2006, 09:46 AM
|
#4 | | Lecturer
Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 440 |
I would of also put Marcus Aurelius on on the list too..
| | |
| |
October 19th, 2006, 12:00 AM
|
#5 | | Historian
Joined: Jul 2006 From: Hellas Posts: 1,315 |
Well the history of the Roman empire itself is a forum on it's own.
I can say my personal oppinion for the most intresting emperors :
Augustus, Marcus Aurelius, Nero, Constantine I.
| | |
| |
March 20th, 2008, 08:40 AM
|
#6 | | Citizen
Joined: Mar 2008 From: Texas Posts: 42 | Re: which roman emporers would be worth studying?
There is a book called The Emperors of Rome by David Potter. It has some info on all the Emporors. This may help you decide who you would like to study. Enjoy!
| | |
| |
March 20th, 2008, 09:11 AM
|
#7 | | Citizen
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 33 | Re: which roman emporers would be worth studying?
Julius Caesar,his commentaries are always worth a read.
| | |
| |
April 16th, 2008, 06:30 PM
|
#8 | | Citizen
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 32 | Re: which roman emporers would be worth studying?
not all.
the period right before the Byzantine empire (specifically, Diocletian's rule) emperors came and wend every couple of years, for the better part of a century.
But by far, my favorite is Julian the apostate.
Constantine was likely the most influential, but Julian's story is about as fascinating as it gets IMO.
| | |
| |
April 16th, 2008, 06:36 PM
|
#9 | | Archivist
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 209 | Re: which roman emporers would be worth studying?
I don't find anything particularly unique or interesting about Julian. He was a well-educated, borderline megalomaniac with delusions of grandeur. Jeez, like there aren't enough of those types in history.
I think Caesar Augustus is the most fascinating I've seen, followed by Constantine and Diocletian. Some of the later Byzantine emperors, such as John Tzimisces, Basil II, Alexios I, and various members of the Dukas clan are also rather fascinating in their abilities and/or vibrant personalities, though it's arguable that some of these figures are as (non-)unique as Julian. Sometimes, emperors take on the appearance of being interesting simply because there are more sources on them, whereas others are simply lacking information.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2008, 03:03 AM
|
#10 | | Academician
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 83 | Re: which roman emporers would be worth studying? Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenjamin but Julian's story is about as fascinating as it gets IMO. | Julian_The_Apostate
I agree... He was our last hope... but he was killed by a Christian... | |
Last edited by Machaon; November 23rd, 2008 at 03:07 AM.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |