Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Ancient History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 5th, 2011, 09:50 AM   #1

unclefred's Avatar
The Snub Nosed Truth
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Oregon coastal mountains
Posts: 5,439
Blog Entries: 29
Infanticide common in the Roman Empire?


Of course we have all heard of the evil practices of the Carthaginians, due in part to Roman historians. How about a look at the Romans:
Infanticide Common in Roman Empire : Discovery News
unclefred is offline  
Remove Ads
Old May 5th, 2011, 10:04 AM   #2

Chrysoloras's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 782

I am sure it was common in most parts of the world back then. Ditto for slavery. Have to agree on the bit about the Romans making sure their enemies got all the bad press, considering most of them hadn't invented writting this wasn't too hard to do either.
Chrysoloras is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 11:19 AM   #3
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,296

Really stretching the archaeological evidence. A disease could have wipe out a number of babies at the same time, and they were buried together.
steve53 is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 11:32 AM   #4

Louise C's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2011
From: Southeast England
Posts: 5,688

In'Goddesses,Whores, Wives and Slaves, Women in Classical Antiquity'Sarah BPomeroy writes:

'Most upper-class Roman women were able to find husbands,not only for first marriages but for successive remarriages. One reason for this,apparently, was that there were fewer females than males among their social peers. As in Greece, this disproportion was the result of the shorter lifespan of females, whose numbers fell off sharply once the childbearing years were reached. there were the additional factors of the selective infanticide and exposure of female infants and probably more important, a subtle but pervasive attitude that gave preferential treatment to boys. This can be surmised from a law attributed to Romulus that required a father to raise all male children but only thefirst-born female. '
Louise C is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 11:53 AM   #5

okamido's Avatar
...
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: Absurdistan
Posts: 24,513
Blog Entries: 14

This is in stark contrast to the customs of Sparta. Still practicing a very measured form of infanticide for purely eugenic reasons, the female newborns were not judged by the same criteria as the males. Much more leeway was given to determine their worthfullness to the state and their ability to produce offspring.

Spartan Women. S.Pomeroy
Property and Wealth in Classical Sparta. S.Hodkinson
Sparta, Beyond the Mirage. S.Hodkinson
okamido is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 12:31 PM   #6

Chrysoloras's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 782

Quote:
As in Greece, this disproportion was the result of the shorter lifespan of females, whose numbers fell off sharply once the childbearing years were reached
This incogrous fact (in terms of our present experience where women live longer on average than men) also holds true for women in the Eastern Roman Empire during medieval times. Nonetheless widowhood was still quite common since men tended to marry younger wifes. Any explanations for the shift or the fact itself would be welcome.
Chrysoloras is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 06:04 PM   #7

Guaporense's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,077
Blog Entries: 9

Simple: woman tended to die giving birth. Today they don't.
Guaporense is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 08:07 PM   #8
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 19,934

Quote:
Originally Posted by unclefred View Post
Of course we have all heard of the evil practices of the Carthaginians, due in part to Roman historians. How about a look at the Romans:
Infanticide Common in Roman Empire : Discovery News
Thanks for sharing with us the fascinating findings still in press of Dr Mays et al .

Our Guaporense is of course entirely right; even at Medieval times as much as 20% of women may have died from obstetric complications.

In social terms, classical infanticide was essentially the equivalent of modern induced abortion; the latter practice was of course far more dangerous for the mother at classical times.

Last edited by sylla1; May 5th, 2011 at 08:12 PM.
sylla1 is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 10:13 PM   #9

Louise C's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2011
From: Southeast England
Posts: 5,688

Quote:
Originally Posted by sylla1 View Post
Thanks for sharing with us the fascinating findings still in press of Dr Mays et al

In social terms, classical infanticide was essentially the equivalent of modern induced abortion; the latter practice was of course far more dangerous for the mother at classical times.
And it fulfilled the same role as abortion does today in many countries, getting rid of unwanted females.
Louise C is offline  
Old May 7th, 2011, 02:54 AM   #10

Chrysoloras's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 782

Thanks for the answer Guaoprense and Sylla. It does make alot of sense. Good job too we left these times behind us.
Chrysoloras is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > Ancient History

Tags
common, empire, infanticide, roman


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Byzantine Empire vs Western Roman Empire Mohammed the Persian Speculative History 59 December 18th, 2011 11:56 AM
American Empire VS Roman Empire : monetary history repeats itself larkin American History 56 February 18th, 2011 07:16 PM
Difference between: Rome/Roman Empire/Holy Roman Empire mdenham2 Ancient History 10 February 4th, 2011 11:46 AM
Roman Republic VS Roman Empire CRUSADERcro Ancient History 36 November 26th, 2009 02:32 AM
Roman Republic vs. Roman Empire ice2w Ancient History 9 March 25th, 2009 09:26 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.