 | | Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions |
May 10th, 2011, 04:30 AM
|
#1 | | Bonapartist
Joined: Sep 2010 From: Somewhere in the former First French Empire Posts: 3,040 | Lead poisoning: Downfall of the Roman Empire
I once heard the lead poisoning led the Roman Empire to his downfall is this true and why?
If it is true the only reason for me would be a shortage of the life expectation, but could that really cause a downfall of an entire Empire?
| | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 04:42 AM
|
#2 | | This title is too lo
Joined: Apr 2010 From: T'Republic of Yorkshire Posts: 15,956 |
This has been mentioned before. I think the consensus is that it's about as credible as the theory of an outbreak of homosexuality bringing the empire down.
| | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 06:35 AM
|
#3 | | Historian
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Oregon Posts: 1,137 | Quote:
Originally Posted by jeroenrottgering I once heard the lead poisoning led the Roman Empire to his downfall is this true and why?
If it is true the only reason for me would be a shortage of the life expectation, but could that really cause a downfall of an entire Empire? | The notion has long intrigued me. Romans used lead in the production of pottery, jugs, etc. Water pipes were often made of lead. Lead in powdered form was even used to flavor wine.
Lead's toxic effects are well known now, but Romans were blithely ingesting the stuff on a daily basis all their lives, including those famous multi-course, hours-long meals the upper class was fond of. So it seems like lead poisoning would have significantly impacted Rome's population, its decision makers, army, etc., especially over a long period of time.
| | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 07:40 AM
|
#5 | | Ye olde librarian
Joined: Oct 2010 From: Florida Posts: 2,462 | | | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 07:44 AM
|
#6 | | Historian
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Oregon Posts: 1,137 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Cicero | From the second link: 'Not only did the Romans drink legendary amounts of wine, he noted, but they flavored their wines with a syrup made from simmered grape juice that was brewed in lead pots. The syrup was also used as a sweetener in many recipes favored by Roman gourmands.
''One teaspoon of such syrup would have been more than enough to cause chronic lead poisoning,'' Dr. Nriagu said. | | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 07:48 AM
|
#7 | | Archivist
Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 189 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Naomasa298 This has been mentioned before. I think the consensus is that it's about as credible as the theory of an outbreak of homosexuality bringing the empire down. | Haha lol. The only problem with an ''outbreak'' of homosexuality, is that romans didn't make enough kids and all they tend to do all day is have sex(STD's rampant obviously).
Not that there's anything wrong with that!(seinfeld)
Back to topic - its very probably that the lead poisoning had a strong effect, however to say that it is ''the main source of the downfall'' is a bit strong, just like gibbon blames all on christianity, christianity blames all on sexuality. I always like to see it as a mix of all things. Another issue is that i don't recall having seen major experiments on what lead poisoning does to mental aptitude. Im sure it does affect an individual, but i would like to see to what extent.
| | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 07:52 AM
|
#8 | | Man in the Box ¤ Blog of the Year ¤
Joined: Oct 2009 From: Baltimorean-in-exile Posts: 16,607 |
I think this is one of the silliest theories I've ever heard. Considering most of the Empire's population outside of the biggest cities didn't drink out of lead pipes, and considering that those who did drank out of them for centuries before the fall of Rome, well...common sense | | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 08:33 AM
|
#9 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 19,934 |
The caveats of these " lead hypotheses" are ostensibly shared by many other on the same topic, where even the minimal correlation is abusively equated with causation.
E.g. to begin with it is usually unclear what is understood by each of the involved authors as the " Fall of Rome" (i.e. the administrative collapse of the Western Empire or the cultural collapse of the Classical civilization on both sides); the exact mechanisms that may have affected the whole Roman state & culture are usually not detailed; and when they are, hard evidence simply don't follow.
And first and foremost, chronological correlation is actually entirely lacking here ...
The following figure (or a similar one) has been posted several times within several threads all along Historum by our Guaporense: 
World production of lead, estimated from Greenland ice cores.
It's easy to verifiy that the pattern is exactly the opposite that would have been expected from any of the "l ead hypotheses"; i.e. the lead production (and exposure) actually peaked at the acme of the Roman Empire (Augustus Age); by the late V century AD it had been already exponentially reduced from long ago.
| | |
| |
May 10th, 2011, 08:44 AM
|
#10 | | Resident Fenian ¤ Member of the Year ¤
Joined: Oct 2010 From: Éire Posts: 6,269 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Salah ad-Din I think this is one of the silliest theories I've ever heard. Considering most of the Empire's population outside of the biggest cities didn't drink out of lead pipes, and considering that those who did drank out of them for centuries before the fall of Rome, well...common sense  | I agree 110%, as my football manager says.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |