Originally Posted by sylla1
Yup, the full quotation is in post #15 above.
It would have helped if I had gone back and reviewed that post again this morning...would have saved me the trouble of searching it out.
IMHO it seems quite likely that Gaius Caesar was by then already expected to be the at least de jure successor, and his father a regent and de facto ruler. |
I don't see anything that we really disagree on here....except the term 'henchman'.