Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Ancient History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 2nd, 2012, 07:10 AM   #1
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2010
From: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,768
Blog Entries: 2
warfare- farmers verses hunters


Anyone who knows the bible knows of Cain and Able.

Quote:
Cain is described as a crop farmer and his younger brother Abel as a shepherd. Genesis 4:2 Cain is portrayed as sinful, committing the first murder by killing his brother, after God rejected his offerings of produce but accepted Abel's sacrifice "from the firstborn of his flock and from their fats".Genesis 4:1,3 Thus, Cain was the first human born, and Abel the first to die.
Wikipedia

I believe this is a record of history. I believe it is the history of nomadic herders entering Mesopotamia, and the winners got to tell the story. Might we explore this, by examining the different styles of warfare?

Quote:
"The types of forces built by a society were a reflection of its economic structure. Nations that evolved in open regions tended to develop mobile units based on chariots and, later, horses. Their armies were extensions of an economy based on animal husbandry. They tend to emphasize missile weapons, in particular the bow. In the Scythian and Persian armies, mounted archers used an extension of herd control techniques to bury their enemies in a cloud of arrows.

Armies created by subsistence farming cultures tended to emphasize shock combat and short-range missile weapons, such as the javelin. Their weapons were extensions of farm implements. They developed dense formations of foot soldiers whose numbers and body armour enabled them to close with an enemy and defeat them in massed, hand to hand combat."
from Atlas of World Military History edited by Richard Brooks
athena is offline  
Remove Ads
Old May 2nd, 2012, 07:34 AM   #2
Archivist
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 217

Well its rather obvious, is it not.. .You use what you have... if you have horses (or elephants or camels), you use them...

If you have numbers, you use them

If you have Iron, you use Iron weapons....

What exactly is your question ?
tomar is offline  
Old May 3rd, 2012, 05:33 PM   #3
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2010
From: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,768
Blog Entries: 2

Can you expound a little more on the different world views? Like may be farmers are busy with their farms, and aren't out looking for trouble? Might they be more inclined to relate to a mother earth goddesses? Might such differences effect the cultures relationship to war?
athena is offline  
Old May 3rd, 2012, 08:12 PM   #4
Archivist
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 134

cain and able are both farmers. cows vs corn is a common problem and has been at least since poseidon and athena had different ideas for athens

the neolithics of stublina had an army maybe??

Click the image to open in full size.

peace
fick is offline  
Old May 3rd, 2012, 08:55 PM   #5

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,480

Nomadic advantage: Tougher men/horses, better ability to fight on horseback, superior skill at the Parthian shot, choosing the battlefield, able to avoid bigger armies, able to attack smaller armies piecemeal.

Sedentary advantage: Better equipment, better drilling, more men at disposal, better ability to fight on foot, men can fight better in formation, better combined arms tactics

This was according to Chao Cuo, who lived from ~200 BC to 150 BC.
HackneyedScribe is online now  
Old May 4th, 2012, 06:04 PM   #6
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2010
From: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 1,768
Blog Entries: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by HackneyedScribe View Post
Nomadic advantage: Tougher men/horses, better ability to fight on horseback, superior skill at the Parthian shot, choosing the battlefield, able to avoid bigger armies, able to attack smaller armies piecemeal.

Sedentary advantage: Better equipment, better drilling, more men at disposal, better ability to fight on foot, men can fight better in formation, better combined arms tactics

This was according to Chao Cuo, who lived from ~200 BC to 150 BC.
Hey, I really appreciate that information. For me all this is kind of like trying to figure out a puzzle. Like imagine if you never saw a man on a horse before, and suddenly there is a horse racing at you and the man on it has weapons and is killing people. This must have been terrifying. Men on horses would surround everyone as they do when hunting animals, and this puts people on their feet, in a pack trying defend themselves. Each learns from the other how to engage in war.

Evidence indicates people lived in the open, and when these invasions began, they moved to places that were easier to defend. The whole order of society changes and taxes become essential to supporting government and an army. Government buildings and statues become huge, and begin to loose their connection with nature. The mother goddess disappears or becomes subordinate to a male God. These are significant cultural changes, evolving out of war, that is very different from raiding parties of people who come on foot and leave on foot, taking maybe food and females, but not really doing much damage.
athena is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > Ancient History

Tags
farmers, hunters, verses, warfare


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pre-Ceramic Hunters, Foragers, and Early Farmers in davu Ancient History 0 September 6th, 2011 09:12 AM
American Glory Hunters Trizzo War and Military History 31 January 16th, 2010 04:01 PM
What happened to French farmers during WW1? toastedpolos European History 3 January 15th, 2010 10:17 AM
Chamberlain verses Reynaud...blame for Munich '38 Richard Stanbery European History 80 January 10th, 2010 08:54 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.