 | | Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions |
June 2nd, 2012, 10:09 AM
|
#1 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 925 | Etruscans Proto-Turks?
Interesting video I found. It shows famous quotes from anthropologists.
Feel free to tell your thoughts.
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 10:25 AM
|
#2 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 925 | | | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 10:36 AM
|
#3 | | Historian
Joined: Jan 2012 From: Karachi Posts: 1,015 |
Everyone is Turkish, deep down inside .
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 10:39 AM
|
#4 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 925 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazyman Everyone is Turkish, deep down inside . | You wish Paki!
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 12:04 PM
|
#5 | | Historian
Joined: Jan 2012 From: Karachi Posts: 1,015 |
Oh yes, us inferior Pakis bow to the supreme mother race .
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 12:20 PM
|
#6 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 925 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazyman Oh yes, us inferior Pakis bow to the supreme mother race . | Stop bowing to a holy cow and be serious for a moment.
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 12:25 PM
|
#7 | | Historian
Joined: May 2012 From: جيبوتي Posts: 1,531 |
OK I watched about 4 1/2 minutes of this but then it said the Turanians were the original inhabitants of the Middle East before the Semitic and Aryan peoples. And it says that the typical Turanians were the Egyptians, Chinese and Japanese, I'm not sure what to make of that statement. It also mentions the Hittite names and religion, the Hittites were Turanian? It doesn't even stop there but says the Turanian were the earliest of races and seems to imply that all languages come from them. This is just too wild.
The article says that they were from Turkey but they weren't Turks. That doesn't make them proto-Turks any more than the Mayans were proto-Spanish.
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 12:26 PM
|
#8 | | Historian
Joined: Jan 2012 From: Karachi Posts: 1,015 | Quote:
Originally Posted by macro Stop bowing to a holy cow and be serious for a moment. | Sure, the correct word is Anatolia, not Turkey .
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 12:32 PM
|
#9 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 925 | Quote:
Originally Posted by antocya OK I watched about 4 1/2 minutes of this but then it said the Turanians were the original inhabitants of the Middle East before the Semitic and Aryan peoples. And it says that the typical Turanians were the Egyptians, Chinese and Japanese, I'm not sure what to make of that statement. It also mentions the Hittite names and religion, the Hittites were Turanian? It doesn't even stop there but says the Turanian were the earliest of races and seems to imply that all languages come from them. This is just too wild.
The article says that they were from Turkey but they weren't Turks. That doesn't make them proto-Turks any more than the Mayans were proto-Spanish. | It doesn't say anything. It only quotes sources from various places about Etruscan.
The bottom line is whether or not there is a connection between Etruscans on linguistic, cultural and genetic level. Ignore the rest.
| | |
| |
June 2nd, 2012, 12:35 PM
|
#10 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 925 |
For example:
"Hence the apparent connection of the Etruscans with other turanian languages, such as the scythic, the Finnic.. Like all Turanians, the Etruscans were TOMB-Building race. At a later period by colanisation. They received a Greek element of civilisation, but the people STILL remained essentially Turanian in their feelings and habits (Hodder M, Westtropp, Handbook of Egyptian, Greek, Etruscan and Roman Archeology, Kessinger, 2003, p.483)
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |