 | | Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions |
July 3rd, 2012, 11:26 AM
|
#1 | | Lecturer
Joined: Aug 2011 From: London of antiquity Posts: 461 | Ancient weapons designs.
What is your personal opinions of weapons in the ancient period? What are the most clever and strong weapons?
| | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 11:28 AM
|
#2 | | SEMISOMNVS
Joined: Oct 2011 From: MARE PACIFICVM Posts: 4,278 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawson567 What is your personal opinions of weapons in the ancient period? What are the most clever and strong weapons? | Whoever came up with the Ballista was a pretty smart cookie...
| | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 12:43 PM
|
#3 | | Scholar
Joined: Feb 2010 From: Cambridgeshire, UK Posts: 629 |
I think it's important to look at ancient weapons in the same way you'd look at modern weapons, that is as parts of weapons systems. For example, a lone man holding a sarissa is probably not going to do too well against another lone man holding practically anything else, he'll either get outmanoeuvred or shot at. However, when used as part of the phalanx "weapon system" it was the most lethal system used until the Roman maniple challenged it (and here there is some debate, not in the results, but as to why they occurred that way).
| | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 01:21 PM
|
#4 | | Historian
Joined: Oct 2009 From: San Diego Posts: 1,956 |
as in all periods... the most sinister and clever weapon of them all is Religion.
Convincing large swaths of people that they absolutely need to go and kill other people is the foundation of all war.
| | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 01:28 PM
|
#5 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: May 2012 From: Nonbeing which is to say everywhere Posts: 3,730 |
The sword was a clever invention.
| | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 04:05 PM
|
#6 | | Revisionist
Joined: Nov 2011 From: Closer to Calais than to Birmingham Posts: 3,636 |
Hope the Horses remember to duck.
Designed to pull soldiers off their horses.
Chinese magazine-fed semi-automatic crossbow c 4th C BC
Greek Fire | | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 06:36 PM
|
#7 | | Lecturer
Joined: Aug 2011 From: London of antiquity Posts: 461 |
The onager is pretty cool...
| | |
| |
July 3rd, 2012, 11:44 PM
|
#8 | | Scholar
Joined: Feb 2010 From: Cambridgeshire, UK Posts: 629 | Quote:
Originally Posted by sculptingman as in all periods... the most sinister and clever weapon of them all is Religion.
Convincing large swaths of people that they absolutely need to go and kill other people is the foundation of all war. | Does that really apply to the ancient period? It's a nice broad sweeping statement but none of the Roman or Greek conquests or wars were inherently motivated by religion (aside from in exceptional cases like the Sacred Wars or or Jewish revolts). But when you look at the majority of wars (Alexander's conquests, Punic Wars, Syrian wars, conquests of Gaul and Britain, Roman civil wars) religion has nothing to do with them.
| | |
| |
July 4th, 2012, 03:36 AM
|
#9 | | Historian
Joined: Sep 2011 From: Jelgava, Latvia Posts: 1,325 |
Doesn't matter. Most people were still using spears and bows a thousand years later.
| | |
| |
July 4th, 2012, 05:51 AM
|
#10 | | Archivist
Joined: Feb 2012 From: South Carolina, USA Posts: 165 |
There were a series of programs on the Nat Geo channel evaluating the ancient weapons. The most effective was the Frankish throwing axe. The 2nd was the Hun's compound bow. Why were these so effective? They placed you at a distance from your opponent. This allowed you to survive longer than face to face combat with a sword or spear.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |