Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Ancient History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Ancient History Ancient History Forum - Greece, Rome, Carthage, Egypt, Mesopotamia, and all other civilizations of antiquity, to include Prehistory and Archaeology discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 2nd, 2006, 01:27 PM   #1

CelticBard's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
From: Roving
Posts: 758
Barbarian Boogymen


Why did Barbarians (Celts, Germans, Dacians, Scythians, Huns, etc.) become the Boogymen for Greek and Roman Civilization, but the image of steel armored troopers did not become boogymen for Barbarian tribes?
CelticBard is offline  
Remove Ads
Old August 2nd, 2006, 03:24 PM   #2

Lord_Cronus's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Sanford, NC
Posts: 1,036

The word barbarian come from the greek "barbaros" which means non-Greek. I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to ask in your question though.
Lord_Cronus is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 05:42 PM   #3

Commander's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,348

He wants to know why Romans feared the Barbarians... and why the Barbarians did not fear the romans.

When you see the image of a barbarian you see a lawless man who fears nothing. Someone who eats meat without cooking it. Someone with a painted face and tattoos. The Romans had images of barbarians living in the woods and showing no mercy. It kind of looks like a boogy man.

The barbarians however did not see the Romans as boogymen because they were more civilized. They had formations and cities and laws. They were fierce warriors but not necessarily scary looking

Does that answer your questions?
Commander is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 05:58 PM   #4

CelticBard's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
From: Roving
Posts: 758

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_Cronus
The word barbarian come from the greek "barbaros" which means non-Greek. I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to ask in your question though.
Barbaros actually describes the bleeting of sheep.
CelticBard is offline  
Old August 2nd, 2006, 06:11 PM   #5

Lord_Cronus's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Sanford, NC
Posts: 1,036

barbarian, barbaryn (older spelling)
1. Etymologically, a foreigner, one whose language and customs differ from the speaker's.
2. Historically: one who is not a Greek; then one living outside the pale of the Roman empire and its civilization, applied especially to the northern nations that overthrew them; followed by one who existed outside the realm of Christian civilization.
3. A rude, wild, uncivilized person.
4. An uncultured person, or one who has no sympathy with literary culture.
5. Applied by nations, generally depreciatively, to foreigners; thus at various times and with various speakers or writers: non-Hellenic, non-Roman (most usual), non-Christian.
From Greek βάρβαρος barbaros, "non-Greek, foreign, barbarous," from an Indo-European imitative base barb, "to stammer, stutter; and unintelligible." The Greeks were quoted as saying that foreigners sounded as if they were saying, "Barbar, Barbar," which was, for the Greeks, unintelligible.

And.....

http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/gr...cgi?number=915
Lord_Cronus is offline  
Old August 3rd, 2006, 12:58 PM   #6

CelticBard's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
From: Roving
Posts: 758

Yes, but read the line that says they sounded as if they were saying barbar barbar, does that not sound like baaah baaah baaah, sheep.
CelticBard is offline  
Old December 12th, 2010, 04:18 AM   #7

rexrar's Avatar
Citizen
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Cluj, Romania
Posts: 20
Re: Barbarian Boogymen


In my opinion the roman troopers was boogymen enough for Celts, Germans, Dacians, Scythians, Huns, etc., but barbarians did not write this down.
rexrar is offline  
Old December 12th, 2010, 04:27 AM   #8

Sargon of Akkad's Avatar
Backworldsman
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: Glorious England
Posts: 6,358
Re: Barbarian Boogymen


Quote:
Originally Posted by rexrar View Post
In my opinion the roman troopers was boogymen enough for Celts, Germans, Dacians, Scythians, Huns, etc., but barbarians did not write this down.
Agreed. I expect that the Romans were a very real boogyman to the barbarians.
Sargon of Akkad is offline  
Old December 12th, 2010, 05:26 AM   #9

sturm's Avatar
миротворец
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Bulgaria
Posts: 8,694
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Barbarian Boogymen


Maybe because barabarians (those that were mentioned in the first post) were warlike people, what they did was war. While greeks and romans citizens were living a life in the cities, maybe having farm and leading a peaceful life (at least as peaceful as it could be for those years), then when the empire was in crisis moments, when it was divided and weakened, barbarians started attacking and tormenting those people. Burning, looting, killing. Spreading terror and fear troughout the roman citizens.
We should remamber that romans even though great soldiers, very advanced for the times, great builders were people too, they also had fears.
sturm is offline  
Old December 12th, 2010, 05:29 AM   #10
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Ozarkistan
Posts: 11,335
Re: Barbarian Boogymen


I still fear the barbarians -- they vote here!
corrocamino is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > Ancient History

Tags
barbarian, boogymen


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.