Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Asian History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Asian History Asian History Forum - China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand, and the Asia-Pacific Region

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 19th, 2017, 01:43 PM   #1

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,048
Blog Entries: 3
Han Dynasty Crossbow II

The following is a rehash of Han Dynasty Crossbow. The reason is because the pictures of the last thread are gone now, and also because of new information.

Han Dynasty Crossbow Technology

The prevalence and praise of the crossbow in ancient Chinese texts is so widespread (The excavated Donghai accounting records show the existence of up to half a million crossbows in its stockpile) that I find this single weapon notable enough to write an entire article centered on it. No doubt, from its inception during the 6th century BC the crossbow revolutionized Chinese warfare. Projectiles fired from a crossbow are much more powerful than those fired from bows, and only a little time is needed for one to become proficient with it. Bolts can be fired with enough force to penetrate shields and armor at a distance. No longer can heavily armored, skilled nobility outmatch the everyday peasant. This essay only deals with ancient crossbows of the Han dynasty, although it was one of the primary weapons in Chinese history for a much longer time than the dynasty itself.

Range and Draw Weight

Just how powerful a crossbow could be is glimpsed in the excavated Chu-yen slips, from which records of crossbow maintenance was kept. From the slips already excavated, we have available a set of records showing six crossbows shooting 168 to 280+ meters. Each of these crossbows had only draw weights of 3-5 stone, as compared to typical Han era crossbows of 6 stone. Without knowing the weight of the quarrel, the range in itself doesn't speak for the effectiveness of these crossbows. However, two slips record tests for their penetration ability. Both show that the crossbows tested punctured a wooden wall (most likely a plank or fence) at 252 meters.

Slip 14.026: 一今力五石廿九斤射百八十步辟木郭
Translation: Present strength 5 stone 29 jin (341 lbs) and will penetrate a wooden wall at 180 paces (252 meters).
Slip 515.46:
Translation: 3 stone (193.5 lbs) crossbow, fully assembled, shoots 120 paces (168 meters)
Slip 36.10:
官第一六石具弩一今力四石【四十】二斤射白八十五步完(The words in 【】 is used to display what the word on the slip means, but the actual word cannot be typed by computer as the word is no longer in use)
Translation: Number one 6 stone crossbow, fully assembled, present strength is 4 stone 42 chin (285 lbs), and it will shoot to the end of 185 paces (259 meters).
Slip 510.026:
Translation: Five stone crossbow fully assembled, shoots 120 paces (168 meters)
Slip 341.3:
具弩一今力四石射二百(too smeared to make out)
Translation: Fully assembled crossbow, present strength 4 stone (258 lbs), shoots two hundred and …[text too smeared to make out] (280-418.6 meters).
Slip 14.62A:
Translation: Present strength 3 stone 29 jin (212.2 lbs) and penetrates wooden wall at 252 meters.

In general Chu-yen slips categorize crossbow draw weight by 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10+ stone, with each stone unit being the modern equivalent of ~64.5 pounds. The majority of crossbows have a draw weight of 6 stone. From the above tests, one can extrapolate that typical Han crossbows of 6 stone would have an average range of over 300 meters, assuming that the bolt fired was no different from those fired from weaker crossbows. The following is a calculation on the percentage of crossbows for each categorical draw weight, but it is currently not verified by me as I did not count them personally(However, historian Yang Hong also states that the majority of crossbows were categorized with draw weights of 6 stone):

1 stone: 1.37%
2 stone: 1.37%
3 stone: 21.92%
4 stone: 2.74%
5 dan: 17.81%
6 dan: 43.84%
7 dan: 2.74%
8 stone: 2.74%
10 stone and above (Great Yellow Crossbow): 5.48%

Efficiency and Power

What must be noted is that crossbows were typically weaker than bows pound for pound due to their shorter powerstroke. Powerstroke is the length required for a string at rest to be drawn back to the trigger. This means crossbows must have heavier draw weights than bows in order to shoot the same projectile at the same velocity. Crossbow-maker Andreas Bichler also confirmed that with crossbow prods of the same draw weight, the one with the lower powerstroke would have more mass, which slows down the prod's shooting speed. Due to this reason, typical crossbows of Medieval Europe generally need to have three to eight times the draw weight of a bow in order to give a similarly powerful shot. but made up for this by utilizing winches to maximize the draw weight.
However, ancient Chinese crossbows thanks to their trigger design allow the nut of the trigger to be placed near the back of the stock. This results in relatively long power strokes rivaling that of a bow, which greatly reduces the crossbow’s usual weakness of energy transference inefficiency. Han dynasty crossbows would have a draw length of 24 inches, implying a powerstroke of 18-20 inches, or rivaling that of a bow.

Click the image to open in full size.
Above is medieval trigger, below is Han trigger

Generally speaking, the power of a bow or crossbow measured in inch lbs = 0.5 x powerstroke length x draw weight. The most commonly mentioned crossbow in excavated accounting records were of the 6 stone (387 lb) type. In comparison most bows would only have draw weights of 40 to 100 lbs. Against armored men, Song dynasty archers could use bows with draw weights of up to 160 lbs, still less than half the draw weight of typical Han crossbows. Furthermore, thanks to the long powerstroke and composite prod, the Han crossbow would have very high efficiencies for a crossbow. Andreas Bichler noted how longer powerstrokes give higher dynamic efficiencies, so even composite prods would have low efficiency insofar that their powerstroke remains short. From this, we have the following result for shooting power

Potential Energy
Heaviest standard 8 stone Han crossbow power = 516 lbs draw weight * ~19 inches powerstroke/2 = 4902 inch lbs
Andreas Bichler's 1200 lb composite crossbow = 1200 lbs draw weight * 7.48 inches/2 = 4488 inch lbs
Tod Todeschini's 1250 lb steel crossbow = 1250 lbs draw weight * 6.5 inches powerstroke/2 = 4062.5 inch lbs
Typical 6 stone strength Han crossbow's power = 387 lbs draw weight * ~19 inches powerstroke/2 = 3676.5 inch pounds
Heavy Song dynasty bow made to pierce armor = 160 lbs draw weight * ~23 inches powerstroke/2 = 1840 inch pounds

The above only shows each weapon's potential energy, but does not compare the actual energy transferred into the projectile. Take note that the pontential energy shown is only an estimation of the area under the force draw curve, but not the actual area of the force draw curve. The estimation is missing the part highlighted in yellow:

Click the image to open in full size.

If we measure actual area, then the potential energy would be higher across the board, with composite prods benefiting much more than steel prods because composite prods have a more prominent "bulge" above the linear line. Because we only have the estimated area under the linear line, dynamic efficiency would be calculated upwards to compensate. So for the information below, just note that actual dynamic efficiency would be lower, but actual potential energy would be higher. The resulting joules should be the same.

Projectile Energy
Heaviest standard 8 stone Han crossbow power = 4902 inch lbs * 60% efficiency = 2941 inch lbs = 332 Joules

Typical 6 stone strength Han crossbow's power = 3676.5 inch pounds * 60% efficiency = 249 Joules
Andreas Bichler's 1200 lb composite crossbow = 4488 inch lbs * 39.04% efficiency = 1752.3 inch lbs = 198 Joules
Heavy Song dynasty bow made to pierce armor = 1840 inch lbs * 75% efficiency = 1380 inch lbs = 156 Joules
Tod Todeschini's 1250 lb steel crossbow = 4062.5 inch lbs * 30.5% efficiency = 1239 inch lbs = 140 Joules

Dynamic efficiency of Han crossbows is adjusted to 60% because that is mid-way between the efficiencies of composite bows and composite prods with short powerstroke. I adjusted upwards because Han powerstrokes are closer to that of bows than that of Medieval European crossbows. Crossbow maker Andreas Bichler confirmed long powerstrokes help with efficiency and gave that as the reason why his own Medieval composite crossbows had such low efficiency compared to composite bows. He also noted how composite crossbows tend to have higher potential energy than steel crossbows of the same draw weight (Composite bows have a greater amount of the yellow area shown in the graph above).


Most bronze weaponry died out during early Han, but throughout the dynasty most crossbow arrowheads were made of bronze with a metallic tang, inserted into a wooden shaft. Some crossbow bolts were not entirely bronze. Rather, the arrowhead was of bronze while the tang (which sockets the bolt into the shaft) was iron. The reason for this is answered by Donald Wagner, who points to the superior casting properties of bronze. Han bronze arrowheads were remarkable for its attention to detail. Their intricate wings placed along the bolt tip were so small yet finely cast that it would be beyond the casting ability of iron for more than a thousand years afterwards.

Click the image to open in full size.
The two projectiles on the right are Han dynasty crossbow bolts, picture taken by Kenneth from CHF

Such precise casting techniques allow a more aerodynamic bolt. Because this aerodynamic design only focused on the bolt tip, having the tang of the bolt be made out of iron would not affect its flight. Therefore, with iron being the cheaper metal, it was only natural for Han metallurgists to design crossbow bolts with a bronze head and an iron tang. Regarding weight, it is standard for crossbow projectiles to weigh 2 liang per stone. This meant that a Han quarrel for its most common crossbow of six stone would weigh 93.75 grams.

Drawing the Crossbow

Yet how were one able to draw these powerful crossbows? Weaker Han crossbows were categorized as “arm-drawn”, in that the bow was drawn in a standing position with the two feet grounded on the prod while the arms pulled the string up towards the trigger. More powerful Han crossbows were “foot-drawn”, in that the string was drawn in a sitting position using both the legs and the arms. This allows a much heavier draw weight as the muscles from the legs are much more powerful than those in the arms. Distance shooter Harry Drake used a 300 lb foot bow, drawn similarly to that of foot-drawn Han crossbows, in order to participate in his archery competitions.
The heaviest crossbows would be drawn with a winch. These would no longer be handheld but must be used with at least a prop. Immobile crossbows fixed inside military forts on on top of walls are called "Revolving Shooters". Each revolving shooter would have a very thick wooden plank in front of it for protection against enemy fire.

Click the image to open in full size.
Revolving shooter found in the northern border of Chu-yen

"Yellow Crossbows" was the name given for more mobile devices. The strongest Heavy Yellow Crossbow could have draw weights of 90 stone, implying that its size would probably be akin to that of a ballista.

Click the image to open in full size.
Eastern Han mural depiction of a winched crossbow at the bottom center, possibly a lower tier "Yellow Crossbow"

Great Yellow Crossbows, unlike revolving shooting machines, can be used as field artillery. Here is a passage of the Great Yellow Crossbow in action, taking place in which general Li Guang's army was surrounding by a Xiongnu force 10 times the size of his army:
广为圜陈外向,胡急击之,矢下如雨。汉兵死者过半,汉矢且尽。广乃令士持满毋发,而广身自以大 黄射其裨将杀 数人,胡虏益解。

Translation: Li Guang ordered his men into a circle facing outward. The barbarians attacked furiously and arrows fell like rain. Over half the Han soldiers were killed, and their arrows were nearly gone. Li Guang ordered his soldiers to draw their strings but refrain from firing, while he himself, using his Great Yellow Crossbow, shot at the enemy sub-commanders, killing several of them, nullifying the Xiongnu advantage. -Shiji
Considering the Great Yellow Crossbow described in this battle was used to snipe enemy personnel, we can say that its draw weight was anywhere from 10 stone (645 lbs) to a couple stones higher. However, the heaviest Great Yellow Crossbow I have read mentioned one Great Yellow Crossbow of 40 stone (2580 lbs)! This is likely much greater in size than lower tier Great Yellow Crossbows, and thus could be interpreted as a siege machine. It is likely that another machine, called Interconnected Crossbow Carriage, would be even more powerful. Interconnected Crossbow Carriages was first mentioned in the Mozi during the Spring/Autumn to Warring States period. They were described as ballistas with wheels placed within its framework, shooting either large arrows with strings attached, or multiples of smaller projectiles at once. By the Han Dynasty, more than 500 of these carriages were described in the military inventory accounting record of Donghai Commandery.

Unfortunately, no contemporary picture of Great Yellow Crossbow or Interconnected Siege Ballista was found, but considering the high draw weight, the stronger ones must certainly have multiple prods attached. This allows the draw weight of the ballista to multiply as the accumulated draw weight of each prod is combined together. If the ancient Interconnected Siege Ballista was anything like the Triple prod Ballista shown in Song Dynasty Manuals, then one prod would be placed backwards. Why not have all three prods face the same direction is worthy of consideration. The answer to this is powerstroke. Having one prod placed facing the opposite direction allows the powerstroke to be increased significantly, and I have described in the OP how powerstroke can increase a ballista's shooting power just as much as the ballista's draw weight. One can see how this works with the following picture:

Click the image to open in full size.

Advantages and Disadvantages

The primary strength of the crossbow is without doubt its strong armor penetration capability. With a median draw weight of 387 lbs, and a powerstroke rivaling that of a bow, Han crossbows could shoot a projectile further and faster than that of a bow. According to the Han era government official Chao Cuo, one of the biggest advantages of Han armies over the Xiongnu was that the crossbow could penetrate the leather armor and wooden shields that the nomads possesed.
Furthermore, a crossbow has the option to shoot shorter projectiles. For a bow, the length of an arrowshaft must be greater than the bow's draw length, or else the bow would not be able to shoot the arrow at full draw. A Han crossbow may very well shoot quarrels with a length rivaling that of an arrow, or it could shoot significantly shorter bolts. This is possible because the quarrel would be launched from the groove of the stock, so a crossbow could even shoot quarrels small enough to be called darts should the occasion warrant it. By shooting shorter quarrels, spent projectiles cannot be picked up by enemy archers to be shot back against the crossbowman. Needham speculates that the East Asian arrow-tube guide (called pyun-chun to the Koreans), was developed by nomadic peoples in order to counter precisely this advantage.
Another advantage is that the crossbow is much easier to aim and shoot than a bow. A bowman must take aim while his arms resist the tension of the string at full draw. Even the strongest bowman could only aim within a limited time frame before his bow arm gives in. A crossbowman can take aim indefinitely, as the tension is held by the trigger. When used in a chariot or ship, the stability that the crossbow provides while aiming no doubt also alleviates the rocking motion of the vehicle involved.
A crossbowman can also draw the string before battle starts, to make sure he is able to take the first shot within a moment’s notice. Examples of this can be found such as when Xiangyu tried to kill the first Han emperor by hiding a pre-cocked pistol crossbow within his clothing. When emperor Wen inspected the military camp of general Zhou Yafu, the sentries were described in the Shiji as “in armour and bearing their swords and other weapons, their crossbows cocked and full of arrows”. The advantage to having a crossbow loaded indefinitely becomes particularly useful in sieges, as crossbowmen could use this advantage to take very quick pot-shots when enemies peek their heads from pavises, battlements, or any other protection.

The Han crossbow does come with shortcomings. Han crossbow prods were composite, including sinew and horn materials. Compared to metal prods of winched crossbows in Medieval Europe, composite prods needs more maintenance and are more susceptible to bad weather conditions. The long powerstroke also requires a very long prod. Andreas Bichler noted how his 617 lb composite crossbow performed very badly because its 75 cm prod was too short for its powerstroke. The Han crossbow design requires a very long prod, otherwise the string would be pulling the bow limbs apart rather than storing energy (a case known as stacking). Thus each crossbowman requires more horizontal space for shooting, which forces crossbowmen to either use open skirmishing formation, or adopt special formations to compensate (such as the countermarch, which will be described below).
The high draw weight of the crossbow also makes stringing difficult, particularly when the bow is recurved like those of Han crossbow prods. By the Qin dynasty, this problem was probably alleviated by having a bastard string in addition to the main string, so that the prod could be left partially unstrung to make stringing easier for future use. When shooting at a particularly elevated angle, the stock of the crossbow would block the user's line of sight, nullifying the crossbow's advantage in superior range when it comes to precision shooting. The biggest offset for the crossbow was its reloading speed. Even when pulled by hand as opposed to mechanical means, a crossbowman would still be outpaced by an archer in rate of fire.

Crossbow Formations

The standard deployment for crossbows would be to have the crossbowmen placed at the flanks of the army, screened by cavalry. In this way they could shoot at the flanks of the enemy. The Han also adopted tactics to offset the disadvantages of their weaponry.
To nullify the disadvantage of the long reload time and the requirement for space, Han era soldiers came up with a drill similar to the countermarch:

The drill of crossbowmen alternatively advancing [to shoot] and retiring [to load]; this is something the Xiongnu cannot face” –Chao Cuo of Western Han, Shiji

The requirement for horizontal space meant that for a given line of 100 meters, a single volley from the front row would consist of only around 70 quarrels, whereas crossbows with shorter prods could squeeze more crossbows into the front row and hence shoot double that many quarrels in a single volley. The countermarch offsets this by allowing the people at the back rows to participate through the practice of shooting in rotation. The number of quarrels per volley would still be the same, but the Han countermarch formation allows for more volleys within a given span of time. Furthermore, the countermarch gives crossbowmen more time to rest in between shots, and offsets their slow fire rate.

Click the image to open in full size.

By the late Han new tactics were developed that, when viewed from the front, would look very similar to the square formation of the flintlock era.

When the enemy comes to the deer-barricades, the soldiers must hold their position behind them and thrust with spear and halberds. They must not stand as rising would hinder the shooting of the crossbowmen.-Military Commands (Late Han-3kingdoms period)
Unlike the crossbows shooting at the back, the couched spearmen at the front could adopt as dense a formation as they wanted.

With this formation, the open-order formation of the crossbowmen would not be susceptible to melee, as the barricades and crouching infantry in front of them acts like a protective wall. The spearmen and halbadiers in front, not being armed with crossbows, could be packed as densely as they wanted to be, and hence be efficient in prolonged melee. This is especially so when they have crossbowmen shooting over their heads and into the ranks of the enemy.


The aiming of the crossbow was refined by both technology and technique. The Han trigger mechanism is a perfect manifestation of this. The trigger itself is designed to operate like a modern trigger in which stored horizontal energy is transferred into a vertical one. This sophisticated design is perhaps the first of its kind that fully allows both hands to stabilize a ranged weapon when discharging a shot.
The trigger also comes with graduated sighting blade and grid sight in order to adjust for target distance, which allows the crossbowman to aim with better accuracy. Liu Chong of the Han dynasty, himself very adept as a crossbowman, described how to use it:

of all the things in the whole wide world, there is none so extraordinary as the principle of sighting. There are three minute points and three small points. The three minute points and three small points are upon the warp and the three small points are upon the weft [analogy to silk looms]. They unite upon the catch of the crossbow. “-translation from atarn

Click the image to open in full size.
Aim by aligning the arrowhead with the proper line in the sighting grid, the correct line being determined by distance of the target

Nearly 1000 years later, Shen Gua of the Song dynasty unearthed a trigger mechanism with a sighting blade. Using Liu Chong’s method for shooting, he managed to score 7-8 hits out of 10. Shen Gua claimed he could have scored even better with a graduated sight.

Bronze Technology

A handheld weapon that could penetrate armor at a distance would be a technology that the Han military would no doubt want to hold a monopoly over. There are plenty of records which show the government attempting to limit such weapons over a certain grade from being brought outside its borders. But the biggest impediment to the empire’s enemies from mass-replicating Han crossbows would be the manner in which the Han crossbow trigger was made. Ancient Chinese bronze-making technology was unique, in that it derived as an offshoot from its advances in ceramic technology. Whereas the rest of the world used the lost-wax process to create bronzework, the ancient Chinese used the piece-mold process. Both bronze making processes entail pouring bronze into a clay mold, which determines the shape of the bronzeware. What’s special about the piece mold process, is that the clay mold could be re-used to make cloned copies of the bronzeware, whereas the clay mold of the lost-wax process would require the clay mold to be destroyed in order to extract the finished product.

The Han crossbow trigger is very intricate, and if any part is off by even a little then the entire mechanism could fail to function properly. The piece mold process allows each individual part of the crossbow trigger to be reproduced again and again in a systematic fashion, with each copy being a virtual clone of the other. In this way trigger parts could be made interchangeable as long as they come from the same cast. Whereas with the lost-wax process, the work and care required to make just one more identical copy of a single trigger mechanism would skyrocket.

Measuring Draw Weight

The Chinese were the first to grade the stiffness of their bows by draw weight. This practice is done by seeing how much weight is added to the string until the string is pulled back to the distance of full draw.

谓若干胜一石,加角而胜二石,被筋而胜三石,引之中三尺。假令弓力胜三石,引之中三尺,弛其弦 ,以绳缓擐之 ,每加物一石,则张一尺
Translation: For a bare bow-stave with draw weight of one stone (64.5 lbs), adding sinew will increase draw weight to two stone, and adding horn on top of that will increase it to three stone. The draw length is 3 chi (1 chi is about 9 inches). If the present draw weight of 3 stone (193.5 lbs) with draw length of 3 chi (27 inches), then if strung with a relaxed string on both sides of the bow, each additional stone added will cause it to be drawn by one chi.
-From Zheng Xuan Zhu

Click the image to open in full size.


The Book of Later Han listed some of the most popular works read during the Han dynasty. Two of the lost books are named “The Strong Crossbow General Wang Wei’s Way of Shooting” and “The Way of Shooting from Afar with the Interconnected Crossbow [a ballista]”. There are other book titles that mention styles of shooting such as “General Li’s Way of Shooting”, which may include the art of shooting crossbows. It is unfortunate that all but the title of the books are lost.

Continued Development of Crossbows

The Song dynasty further improved on crossbow technology, adopting a stirrup and even double prod winched crossbows that were handheld. It is possible these double prod crossbows were placed on some sort of stand for winching purposes, but was shot in a handheld manner. Nevertheless, these types of crossbows would have been few, but the development of the stirrup affected nearly all handheld crossbows:

In the His-Ning reign period [+1068/+1077], Li Ting presented (to the imperial court) the plaited frame crossbow [pien chia nu] [his invention], which looked like a bow, but was armed by means of a stirrup placed against the ground. Its bolts could be shot to 300 paces [500 yards], and two thickness of armour scales could be penetrated. It was called Shen Pi Kung [Magic Stock Bow], and was considered the best of weapons. Li Ting had originally been chief of the Tang-hsiang Chiang tribe, but became an officer of a defence corpse after he had made his obedience to the emperor. Afterwards he died in office, and all his sons were famous on the western frontiers for their bravery.

With the onset of gunpowder weaponry, the need for hard-hitting crossbows declined. The niche for armor penetration was taken by projectiles shot by the force of gunpowder (arrow shooting guns in the earliest stages, and then arquebus and rockets in later stages). By the late Ming, crossbows adopted attributes that were shared by European crossbows, namely the short powerstroke and short prod. The prod was also made of bamboo lathes tied together, which was easier on maintenance but decreased efficiency. Overall, crossbows declined in importance within the military, and its design became more focused on ease of use and ease of maintenance, rather than the 'pure power' focus of earlier designs.

Click the image to open in full size.

The difference in power was not lost on the late Ming. When they dug up their old crossbows they noticed how they were more powerful than contemporary ones, despite being of lighter draw weight.

"近于陕西省城见有城楼旧题神臂弩数百张,相传者百余年矣。乃知先朝亦尝制此。虽皆损坏,而制度 犹存,但箭则 无矣。臣谨从宜遵效造成。其制以阔厚坚劲大弓,其力一百五十斤上下、及一百二十斤上下、及九十 斤上下,为三 等,虑人力有强弱也。其长均为四尺五寸,矢取其利最远,而端可及三百步内外者。为矢,其长均七 寸五分,其重 则六钱上下,亦三等,俾与弩称。复效汉耿恭之法,箭簇开四尖,又辅以荷兰嵩县等处射虎箭药,俾 入马中无不三 洞。尤虏所畏。其箭簇后小铁管心,仅长分许,入箭杆处内用漆胶外用竹丝以夹缚之,俾虏不能取以 反射。盖虏之 射艺极精,矢无虚发,惟此足以胜之。”
"recently at a city in Shanxi province there were several hundred old shenbi crossbows in the tower which has been passed down for over one hundred years. It was created by the previous regime. Even though they are all broken, the instruction system survived but there are no arrows. I followed the instructions and successfully created them. It was made from thick and strong bows and it have a draw weight of around 150 jin, 120 jin, and 90 jin, three total...it can shoot a range of around 300 paces."

我中国之御夷虏,专以长兵取胜。故前代弓矢不足,加以弩箭。汉制:官有强弩将军、射声校尉,器有神臂弩、大 黄弩、连弩、药弩。匈奴呼药箭为汉家神箭。自有火器,弩制遂 -神器
When defending against Yi and Hu barbarians, our country traditionally relied on ranged troops for victory. In ancient times the bow and arrow was not enough, so crossbows and quarrels were introduced. By the Han, the officials have strong crossbow generals and captains who shoot by sound. The machines include Divine Arm crossbows, Great Yellow crossbows, Interconnected Crossbows, and Medicine Crossbows. The Xiongnu called the Medicine quarrels as the Han’s divine quarrels. Ever since gunpowder weapons, crossbows became abandoned.

Yet even with the advent of gunpowder weapons, the effect of the crossbow was not totally lost. Notice how the following looks similar to the countermarch and deer-barricade formations described above?:

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Sources used:
Records of the Grand Historian, by Simaqian
The Book of Later Han, by Fan Ye
Chu-yen slips
The Military Storehouse of YongShi’s 4th year Equipment Account Book
Handbook of Oriental Studies, by Donald Wagner
Asian Traditional Archery Research Network, by Stephen Selby
Science and Civilization in Ancient China, by Needham
Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries, Volumes 12-22
Andreas Bichler's Comments
Tod Todeschini

Last edited by HackneyedScribe; November 19th, 2017 at 02:32 PM.
HackneyedScribe is offline  
Remove Ads
Old November 19th, 2017, 02:12 PM   #2
Joined: Aug 2013
From: 'Maircuh
Posts: 2,885
Blog Entries: 2

So how much of this is your own research or other people's work?
Haakbus is offline  
Old November 19th, 2017, 02:17 PM   #3

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,048
Blog Entries: 3

It's my own built up over the years with information that I acquired. Everything's in my own words excluding some of the translations. Obviously I used tons of sources. If it's just a copy/paste of other people's work I imagine the grammar would be better. I myself never cared much for it.

You can see my original here: Han Dynasty Crossbow

Last edited by HackneyedScribe; November 19th, 2017 at 02:21 PM.
HackneyedScribe is offline  
Old November 19th, 2017, 02:41 PM   #4
Joined: Aug 2013
From: 'Maircuh
Posts: 2,885
Blog Entries: 2

Originally Posted by HackneyedScribe View Post
It's my own built up over the years with information that I acquired. Everything's in my own words excluding some of the translations. Obviously I used tons of sources. If it's just a copy/paste of other people's work I imagine the grammar would be better. I myself never cared much for it.

You can see my original here: Han Dynasty Crossbow
It's pretty impressive, to be honest.

I've done some similar research into premodern Korean firearms and ships but I've never gotten around to putting it all together in a coherent form like this.

Last edited by Haakbus; November 19th, 2017 at 03:05 PM.
Haakbus is offline  
Old November 19th, 2017, 04:02 PM   #5

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,048
Blog Entries: 3

Originally Posted by Haakbus View Post
It's pretty impressive, to be honest.

I've done some similar research into premodern Korean firearms and ships but I've never gotten around to putting it all together in a coherent form like this.
Thanks Haakbus.

Anyway, I detect some might get confused between actual and linear draw force curves. From my discussion with Andreas Bichler, he said:

50% could be possible but only with a very heavy bolt and at the cost of speed. So a speed between 50 and 60m/s is the best choice between power and large range but the efficiency will be between 30 and 40%. My old crossbows wasn't exact close to originals so the 280kg bow had a to long powerstroke - a reason for a broken horn core.... A composite crossbow is able to store more cinetic energy like a steelbow - for example my 550kg composite bow is able to store aprproximately 590J. The 500kg steelbow from Ingo Lison (a very excelent german crossbow maker) stores only 390J and his 1000kg steelbow stores 599J. So you can see one of the great advanteges: A horn bow with a similar draw weight of a steel bow is more capable in storing energy and thus transferring more energy to the bolt, which results in greater shooting distances and more penetration power. For futher informations you can contact me per mail.

Unlike Bichler, my equations used the linear draw curve, which gives lower potential energy than that of the actual, and this also results in higher dynamic efficiency. The two differences would even each other out, so the resulting projectile energy would be more or less the same if I did it Bichler's way (in fact they have to even out because for most of them, because I calculated backwards).

Bichler used the actual draw curve, but most crossbows don't have this information so I resorted to the simpler equation above. He also confirmed what I said here:

If you don't mind me asking, do you know why these composite crossbows have such a low efficiency (~40-45%) compared to composite bows (~75%)? Right now my guess is prod mass. Whereas a bow only needs to achieve its full draw weight with the string pulled back ~23 inches, a crossbow must achieve its full draw weight when its string is pulled back to 6 inches (or in this case 15 inches). This requires a relatively stiffer prod.

Bichler's answer: You are absolutely right - the Austrian crossbow expert Egon Harmuth wrote in his book "Die Armbrust" that a composite crossbow has an efficiency of 60% . All my experiments showed an efficiency between 30 and 40%

Again, keep in mind he is speaking in terms of calculating using the actual potential energy, which includes the yellowed area in the graph above. If speaking in terms of calculating using the linear curve to estimate potential energy like what I did with my equations (and this is what most people do because few bother to measure the actual draw force curve), then dynamic efficiency would be roughly 20% higher, and this is evened out by lowering potential energy down by about 20% because we are excluding the yellowed area. Multiply by 1.2 and then divide by 1.2 means you end up having the same number.

Last edited by HackneyedScribe; November 19th, 2017 at 04:26 PM.
HackneyedScribe is offline  
Old November 19th, 2017, 08:38 PM   #6

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,048
Blog Entries: 3

Now as shown in the OP above, crossbows by the late Ming became much weaker as powerstroke shortened in favor of ergonomics. But the following passage from the Ming showed that they knew this to be the reason:

The powerstroke is an expression of anger. With the crossbow, the force applied can easily be multiplied several times (than that of a Bow). A crossbow used in a normal fashion with a poundage of approximately 150 to 160 catties (~200 lbs, each catty is about 1.32 lbs), it can shoot an arrow weighing not more than 2 maces (7.4 grams). Within 50 steps, (the arrows) can be fired accurately and powerfully. If shot from too far a distance, it is difficult to hit (the enemy). Moreover, (the arrow fired) will be weak and unsteady. It is being said historically: "A strong crossbow cannot pierce even a plain white silk at the end (of its effective shooting range".
Using a bow is exhausting. The archer has to use his strength to draw the bow and may end up exhausted. If the bow has a poundage of 40-catties, everyone can use (draw) it. And shoot arrows that are 5 maces (18.9 grams) in weight. Why is that?
Loaded on the bowstring, the distance from the undrawn bowstring to the bow-frame is 5 cun (6.5 inches). Deducting away that 5 cun (6.5 inches), there is a remainder of 1 chi 8 cun (23.4 inch powerstroke). Fully-pulled to the maximum power. Adding on to that, the archer's skillful release. Therefore, the arrow can kill the enemy even at a distance of 100-steps. When crossbow's bowstring is drawn, the powerstroke is only 5 cun (6.5 inches). The arrow is shot with only the power (powerstroke) of 5 cun. Arrows on the crossbow cannot be loaded as deeply as the bow (Meaning: Crossbows has shorter powerstroke). Furthermore, the user cannot put his own archery skills to use (as the Crossbow is rigidly fired as a gun).
The Crossbow may be powerful, but the arrows are light, and cannot be shot far. The Bow may have less power, but its arrows are heavy, and have an effective range of more than 100-steps. The power of the Crossbow's fury, cannot reach up to the Bow's fine skills. Although Archery practioners can be found everywhere in the world, in the midst of hundreds of thousands, there may not necessarily be a skillful one. Archery techniques are difficult.
Hence, Ruan-Zi says "Most are good with the Crossbow, but clumsy with the Bow."
The Bow itself is not accurate, and relies on the Archer's skills. The Crossbow itself is accurate, hence it's easier to shoot. Thus, based on this situation, the Foot-drawn crossbow is constructed. With moderate amount of strength, one is able to draw the crossbow. Average people can practice and use it too. As documented later, the loading methods and shooting methods can be learnt in the morning, and completed at sunset (Meaning: the training can be completed in a short amount of time.). Though it is smaller and inferior to the Bow, the Crossbow has better accuracy. No worries of moisture ruining it, the cost (of a Crossbow is economical). -
Martial Arts Practiced After Farming by Master Cheng Zong You

The "foot crossbow" he mentions looks like this:

Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
^The three crossbows above are adjusted to scale with each other.

Cheng Zong You later tried to replicate ancient designs and came up with a crossbow with a longer powerstroke and using an ancient trigger mechanism:

I (author Cheng Zong You) obtained an old copper mechanism and made a Waist-Drawn Crossbow. Drawing the bowstring to the mechanism, it has about 800 catties (1052 lbs) of force. It can only be drawn by someone highly capable. The Foot-Drawn Crossbow allows people to draw more quickly. However, to shoot arrows far and powerfully, one must use the Waist-Drawn Crossbow. As it has the ability to pierce rocks and destroy walls. Those who are weaker shall use the Foot-Drawn crossbow, while those who are stronger shall use the Waist-Drawn Crossbow. With my method of using the Waist-Drawn Crossbow, one can draw and load it alone. If more power is desired, then the Waist-Drawn Crossbow can only be draw with the assistance of other people. Compared to the Foot-Drawn Crossbow the difference is in its shooting range.
Naming the Waist Drawn Crossbow:
Arm's strength is insufficient, thus the waist shall contribute. Devastating and resolute, shooting far and swift, though it takes the strength of 2 or more men to draw, it may be used by only 1 man.

Click the image to open in full size.

Notice that the cheek rest is gone, so that the draw length is lengthened to about 14.3 inches. Its ~12 inch powerstroke is still only ~2/3 that of the powerstroke of ancient Han design, because the stock length is still very short at 20 inches and the prod is not placed at the very front of the stock. It appears all Chen did was use the same stock length of the crossbows of his time, but merely replaced the cheek rest as the new trigger location. Nevertheless, the increased draw weight of 800 catties made up for it.

Note: The translation is by Jack Chen from chineselongsword.com, but I think he mixed draw length with powerstroke, so I corrected it (The author deducted a brace height from the draw, so the remaining distance should be the powerstroke). The passage clearly describes that the brace height for bows is 5 cun, and 2 cun for crossbows.
Note2: The late Ming passage is going to be confusing when read with the OP. With the introduction of the crossbow stirrup, the arm-drawn crossbow is called the foot-drawn crossbow, and what was previously called the foot-drawn crossbow, is now the waist drawn crossbow.

Last edited by HackneyedScribe; November 19th, 2017 at 09:37 PM.
HackneyedScribe is offline  
Old November 19th, 2017, 08:58 PM   #7

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,048
Blog Entries: 3

Late Ming author Cheng Zong You (the guy quoted above) also speaks of how crossbowmen were also armed with spears and giant two handed swords. When engaging the enemy, the swordsmen are in front, shooting first. These are followed by the spearmen, practicing rotating fire. When they are about to engage in melee, the spearmen engages first, while the swordsmen "cover the left and right sides of the spearmen". After the spears engage in close combat, swordsmen "roll out to cut and kill. The Long (Spear) and Short (Sword) shall mutually support each other, covering each other's weaknesses."

There is also a lot of emphasis on how to carry the crossbow, in order to conveniently grab melee weapons in quick order. This heavily implies one reason why Ming crossbows shortened the stock length (and in effect shortened the powerstroke). As gunpowder weapons became prevalent, crossbows stopped being primary weapons but became a sidearm, and sidearms needed to be small. This way soldiers won't be too slow to retrieve their spears/swords once melee engagement occurs. You can see how Chen viewed crossbows as a sidearm because even in his chapters concerning crossbows he still talked about what type of sword design is best. This is despite how he has his own chapter on swords too.

Last edited by HackneyedScribe; November 19th, 2017 at 09:38 PM.
HackneyedScribe is offline  
Old November 20th, 2017, 08:28 AM   #8
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 396

Originally Posted by Haakbus View Post
It's pretty impressive, to be honest.

I've done some similar research into premodern Korean firearms and ships but I've never gotten around to putting it all together in a coherent form like this.
As usual, Hackneyed, I have to agree with this assessment!
No Bias FTW is offline  
Old November 23rd, 2017, 09:56 AM   #9

HackneyedScribe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,048
Blog Entries: 3


More from late Ming author Cheng Zong You:

Ancient warriors went to war, armed with a Spear, a Crossbow, a Quiver, Poison Bottle, and Arrow Shaving Knife. These items are secured to a leather belt, or carried in a shoulder-bag. Hang the Crossbow and other items at the right-waist. Hold the Spear in formation. Use the Crossbow if the enemy is far. Use the Spear if the enemy is close This is the best way.
After consideration, when shooting with the Crossbow, my (author Cheng Zong You) opinion is that one should discard and place the Spear on the ground. When needed, one can pick up the spear and use the Spear again. If the enemy is close and it is crowded, there will be no impediment. Or, for Spears with a pointed rear-end, it can be thrust into the ground for it to stand straight up, while one is shooting the Crossbow. Then, there won't be any inconvenience of having to bend down and pick up the Spear.
However, we wouldn't know if Spears will always have a pointed butt-end and thus this method of erecting the Spear cannot always be used. Moreover, the Spear is long. If the enemies suddenly rush forward and crowd in one can only thrust where the Spearhead is pointed at. Both left and right sides will be difficult for the Spearmen to thrust.
However, when facing the enemy, there is nothing more advantageous than a long Spear. My opinion is that the Long-Saber will be able to tactically cover the left and right sides of a Spearman. So that both short and long weapons can work together and complement each other. This is the best way to deploy the Spear in battle.
The long Saber is 3 zhang 7 cun long, and it is sashed in the belt at the left side of the waist.
When engaging the enemy with the Long-Saber take one end of the crossbow's prod, and insert it diagonally into the belt at the back. Then draw out the long saber to face the enemy. One can turn and cut at all directions with maximum convenience.........

One can see from the above passage that late Ming crossbowmen were expected to fight in melee while still having the crossbow strapped onto his own person. This is made possible by the small size of the late Ming crossbow. Whereas, the Tang crossbowmen in the Tongdian were expected to engage the enemy in melee by dropping their crossbows onto the ground and picking up his polearms. So pre-Ming crossbows seem too big to both carry it on one's own person AND fight with a polearm, but this also meant the crossbow was much more powerful because the increased size allowed a longer powerstroke.

A division consists of an army of 20,000 people. 14,000 of them are used for battle, making up 180 dui………The crossbowmen fire at the bandits when they are within 150 paces (225 meters), the bowmen fire at the bandits when they are within 60 paces (90 meters). If the bandits come within 20 paces (30 meters), the crossbowmen and bowmen drop their bows and crossbows, to be picked up by people from the back. These bowmen first grab the sword staffs and ferociously attacks with the Zhanfeng dui.-Tongdian

The Donghai Commandery military inventory slips also heavily implies that Han dynasty crossbowmen used a similar tactic, because its two most common weapons by far is the crossbow and the Pi. The Pi is just a spear, except the spearhead is incredibly, incredibly long (so basically a sword with its handle long enough to be a staff, which is more or less how ancient Chinese records describe the Pi). No other weapon quantity comes even close to the quantity listed for crossbows/Pi within the inventory.

So it seems that wheareas Han/Tang crossbowmen used a single melee weapon that is a blend between the spear and the sword, late Ming author Cheng Zong You advocated that crossbowmen use a mix of the spear and the sword.

Han DongHai inventory slip:

--------Crossbow: 537,707 (imperial owned: 11,181)
--------Bows: 77,521
--------Subtotal: 615,228
--------Crossbow bolts: 11,458,424 (imperial owned: 34,265)
--------Imperial owned arrows: 1,199,316 (imperial owned: 511)
--------Subtotal: 12,657,740
--------Jia Armor: 142,701 (imperial owned: 34,265)
--------Iron thigh clothing: 255, 1 pair of unique ones
--------Kai armor: 63,324
--------Armored thigh clothing: …ten thousand 563
--------Iron lamellar armor: 587,299,
--------Leather armor is 14 jin [7.5 lbs]
--------Helmets: 98,226
--------Horse helmet: 5,330
--------Shields: 102,551
--------Bronze Ge: 632 (imperial owned: 563)
--------Spear: 52,555 (imperial owned: 2377)
--------Imperial owned sheng: 943
--------Pi sword-staff: 451,222 (imperial owned: 1421)
--------Ji halberd: 6,634
--------YoFang: 78,393
--------Duan: 24,167
--------Subtotal: 614,546
--------Sword: 99,905 (imperial owned: 4)
--------JingLu Dagger: 24,804
--------Saw…sabre: 30,098
--------Sabre: 156,135
--------Great Sabre: 127 (232)
--------Subtotal: 311,069
--------Iron axe: 1132 (136)
Battle Carts:
--------ChengYuZheng chariots, drum chariots,
--------WuGang chariots:18
--------Soldier’s ChengYu chariots: 24
--------Interconnected Crossbow Carriage: 564
--------Charging chariot: 37
--------Drum Chariot: 4
--------Battle Chariot: 1
--------…chariot: 564
--------…chariot: 1
--------WuGang strong crossbow chariot: 10
--------ZuiBi chariot: 1
--------Battle chariot: 502
--------3 wheeled soldier’s chariot: 1 (168)
--------Tracking: 9
--------High…chariot: 11
--------….chariot: 7
--------….chariot…chariot: 2133
--------Su…heavy chariot: 1993
--------Soldier’s…chariot: 677
--------He chariot: 2
--------FeiLow temporary chariot: 2
--------Subtotal: 7174 (imperial owned 42 + 7132)

The metallic parts of Han dynasty Pi:
Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by HackneyedScribe; November 23rd, 2017 at 11:33 AM.
HackneyedScribe is offline  
Old November 23rd, 2017, 10:42 AM   #10

Ichon's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2013
From: .
Posts: 3,131

On that inventory slip what is the point of repeating Imperial Owned, and if it wasn't Imperial Owned where did it belong?
Ichon is offline  

  Historum > World History Forum > Asian History

crossbow, dynasty, han

Search tags for this page
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Han Dynasty Crossbow HackneyedScribe Asian History 92 April 30th, 2016 11:54 AM
Bow vs Crossbow Mrbsct War and Military History 11 July 16th, 2014 04:43 PM
Chinese Pedal cocking crossbow (Divine Armed Crossbow) HeroSK Asian History 7 March 9th, 2014 10:04 PM
who invented the crossbow? DeliciousTomatoesYay Asian History 14 March 19th, 2012 09:55 PM
Crossbow NomadBard Medieval and Byzantine History 12 August 15th, 2008 03:59 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.