Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Asian History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Asian History Asian History Forum - China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand, and the Asia-Pacific Region


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 13th, 2011, 04:37 AM   #1
Archivist
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 216
Prelude to the battle of Panipat between the Maratha Empire and the Afghans


Click the image to open in full size.
Maratha commander Sadashivrao Bhau

Click the image to open in full size.
The Jat ruler Suraj Mal

Before the battle of Panipat between the forces of the Marathas under Sadashivrao Bhau and the Afghans
under Ahmad Shāh Abdālī in 1761 the Marathas tried to make alliances with several rulers of North India.
The Marathas tried to convince the Hindu Rajput rulers of North India to join them in the battle against the
outside invader Ahmad Shāh Abdālī. But the Hindu Rajput rulers refused to support the Marathas because
the Marathas had levied heavy taxes on the Rajputs bevore. The only major ruler of North India who
agreed to join forces with the Marathas was the Jat ruler Suraj Mal and a Maratha-Jat alliance was forged.
But shortly before the battle of Panipat the Jat ruler Suraj Mal decided to abandon the Marathas.

This is a description of the situation before the battle of Panipat which explains why Suraj Mal abandoned the Marathas:
Before the battle of Panipat A meeting (conference) was held in the camp of Raja Bhau in which 551 delegates participated. Sadashivrao Bhau was made the chairman. After this Ramrai, an old Pandit of Haryana blessed the conference after enchanting Veda mantras.
In this conference the delegates expressed their notions as under:
"Sadashivrao Bhau is born in the house of Chitpawan Brahmins who are staunch followers of religion and true patriots. All the Hindus of northern India should follow them. Whether Hindus or Muslims all will be benefited by our victory in this battle. A foreigner can never be good to us. Beware of split and division. Live united, union is strength.
Now the Rajas of Rajasthan (Hindu Rajput rulers) do not join Marathas who are the true followers of India's religion and culture, Abdali is foreigner and is the follower of a different faith. Formerly Abdali was a commander of Nadir Shah who looted a booty of million of rupees. Is there somebody to ask these kings, what benefit they had from that battle? Now after nineteen years Abdali has not returned to offer you any thing. Instead he invades us to seize out wealth, and the remaining limited wealth of the Mughal and the lives of thousand of people. The Rajas of Rajasthan (Hindu Rajput rulers) will not be with you, rather they are rejoicing to see you entangled with Abdali.
Their blood prefers to be subjected by foreigners than offer cooperation to their own brethren."

The Council appealed to Sujan Singh (Maharaja Suraj Mal) to express his views. He stated:
"Honourable Chairman! The principality of our country is in the hands of Peshwa (Maratha Empire) in these days. The Mughals are nominal emperors. Their court has become as arena of clowns and jokers. This time you come here as a leader of Maharastra Mandal sent by Peshwa. You have passed a distance of thousands of miles to save the country and religion. All our wealth and lives are dedicated to you. Do not fear Abdali. We stand for the prestige of Peshwa. These days Peshwa is like a sheet (Chadar) to cover the Hindu faith. You are his brother and you have a keen desire to strengthen India. You are our representative. We, on behalf of all the Hindus of India, offer you respect equal to the Peshwa. In the first instance you are a Brahmin and besides you are a crown of Hindus. We shall sacrifice our everything on you. My 25,000 soldiers, 60 cannons and all the army of Sarv-Khap panchayat of Haryana will be in your service. Think a little over my views, and the rest is up to you to accept it or not. You are elder and elders may only be beseecher. My suggestions are as under:
1. Before the battle provisions should be accumulated in a safe place like Brij or Bharatpur.
2. To accompany ladies in the battles our strength will be divided. They should therefore be kept in the fort of Deeg.
3. Establish the centre for heavy weapons and other articles at a distant place, and fight the battle with guerilla strategy.
4. Involve Abdali's army in a battle till summer falls, and in the summer make a vigorous attack
5. Do not harm a place of Mohammedan worship. Call a council in the court and choose a Mughal Prince as your chief and thus gain their sympathy. Do not touch precious articles kept in the fort so the Mohammedan may not use this opportunity to make propaganda against us. Invite as many Chiefs as possible to join you and no divide should occur in the organization.

6. All Mohammedan of India will remain with Abdali. Courtiers of Mughals are involved in conspiracy. You must not trust them, yet you must listen to them.
7. It is my special appeal to your chief commandant Ibrahim Gardi that he should consult me for war strategy. For five to six months, guerilla attacks should be only be made, that too only now and then. Keep your contact with Delhi.
8. The heavy loss in the battle of Kunjpura has familiarized Abdali of our power. For some time Abdali had been collecting provisions and troops from the Rohilla State. So the battle is to be fought decisively. Victory or loss is in the hand of God."

But Sadashivrao Bhau refused to listen to Suraj Mal which developed cracks in the Maratha-Jat alliance.

Last edited by Theseus; November 13th, 2011 at 04:55 AM.
Theseus is offline  
Remove Ads
Old November 13th, 2011, 04:48 AM   #2
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Ozarkistan
Posts: 11,335

Very interesting indeed.

I myself find the first battle of Panipat more interesting than the succeeding two, because it heralded the advent of the Great Mughals, and it is judged to be the first battle decided by artillery, against odds of manpower, if I recall correctly. (Not that I was there.)
corrocamino is offline  
Old November 13th, 2011, 06:11 AM   #3
Archivist
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 216

Quote:
Originally Posted by corrocamino View Post
Very interesting indeed.

I myself find the first battle of Panipat more interesting than the succeeding two, because it heralded the advent of the Great Mughals, and it is judged to be the first battle decided by artillery, against odds of manpower, if I recall correctly. (Not that I was there.)
Actually the little-known battle of Raichur between Ismail Adil Shah of Bijapur and
Sri Krishnadevaraya of the Vijayanagar Dynasty in 1520 CE was the first time in Indian history
that artillery was used. But I have to admit that artillery did not decide the battle.
orkut - Krishnadevaraya and Glorious Battle of Raichur
Theseus is offline  
Old November 13th, 2011, 07:48 AM   #4

Shaheen's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: May 2011
From: UK
Posts: 1,717

All three battles of Panipat are significant in their own manner. The first one obviously brought the Mughals to S. Asia. In the 2nd one if their had been no victory for Akbar/Bairam Khan , then the Mughals would have probably never recovered and would have at most been limited to the NW (Pakistan) + Afghanistan.
The third one of course changed the whole situation of Northern S. Asia.
Shaheen is offline  
Old November 14th, 2011, 03:57 AM   #5

johnincornwall's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Cornwall
Posts: 657

The Maratha confederacy had a busy time of it, what with the British just around the corner too!
johnincornwall is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > Asian History

Tags
afghans, battle, empire, maratha, panipat, prelude


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How would be the world today if the Marathas had won at the Battle of Panipat The Imperial Asian History 29 September 13th, 2012 03:59 AM
How did the Afghans win against the Soviets? Satuf Middle Eastern and African History 48 May 20th, 2012 01:06 PM
Light skinned Afghans? Nick Asian History 17 November 1st, 2009 04:28 AM
Prelude to the Civil War? Vir0n American History 13 March 24th, 2009 02:41 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.