So you guys are still reading stuff from Dienskes blog and his own little interpretations?
. I still remember the day when people get their sources from this racist amateur blogger called Robert Lindsay who takes data from scientific studies and than make his own crazy interpretations and conclusions lol
Here is a link to the study ( No interpretations from Dieneskes ) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes : Nature : Nature Publishing Group Why only Japanese?
Why not mixed race Columbians who have more East Asian DNA?
Why not so called 100% African who have higher East Asian DNA
Why not Iberians who have higher East Asian DNA
Why not Finnish people who have more African DNA than Siberian?
Seriously last time I checked all the Finnish people DNA chart shows them having 5.86% Siberian/Mongoloid DNA and 0% African DNA, this chart shows having higher African admixture than both Siberian and East Asian... isn't this funny? I mean lot at that chunk, it's even 2x higher than other Europeans and they don't even have any African haplogroups lol
Also why not explain why 100% Africans have higher East Asian DNA?
Except other East Asians are not descendants of Y-DNA haplogroup DE*. |
Only Japanese are more related to Africans because they are direct descendants of Y-DNA haplogroup DE*.
Tibetans D1 and Tibeto-Burmese D3a but no African admixture. Why only Japanese are more related with African
Didn't you mtDNA M and N are descendants of African maternal L3. M is marker is found from 20-25% in East and Southeast Asians. N is also found at 3-5% in Asians???
If Japanese are related with Africans than so are Koreans because Koreans have 20% of M and 5% of N.
Just out of curiousity, could this be attributed to the Japanese mixing with the Ainu and other natives, who presumably were genetically closer to Africans than the typical East Asian?
No... Jomon are genetically closer to Native Americans and old Siberians and Ainu today are predominately Jomon.
Facial reconstruction of Jomon man and women
This admixture doesn't mean there was any interracial admixture like Mandchure tried to interpret.
Originally Posted by Jhangora
But Male Haplogroups are just 50% of the story. What about the Japanese Female lineages? Are they African too?
Japanese have 14% Jomon mtDNA and 36% Jomon Y-DNA.
Aside from mtDNA N9b and M7a, other Jomon lineage according to Japanese scientist are M10, Z, N9B, Y, M8 so on average Japanese have 14% Jomon mtDNA and range from 8.1% to 20%. while for Y-DNA is 26.4%-46.2% so the average for Japanese would be 36%
Ancient Jomon mtDNA
N9b and M7a is the most predominate and found in all 3 Jomon groups sampled.
The Kanto Jomon have 3.7% M7a but no N9b