 | | Asian History Asian History Forum - China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand, and the Asia-Pacific Region |
November 28th, 2012, 11:28 AM
|
#2 | | Quixotic Jedi
Joined: Apr 2011 From: The True Capital of China Posts: 5,029 |
The title may be subtly different but I already fear for this thread. The old argument is under Moderator Review. I think it would be wise to await their decision before attempting to discuss this subject once again.
| | |
| |
November 28th, 2012, 12:16 PM
|
#3 | | Academician
Joined: Nov 2012 Posts: 80 |
jurchens(manchus) are not nomads, a big mistake.
| | |
| |
November 28th, 2012, 12:19 PM
|
#4 | | Historian
Joined: Sep 2012 Posts: 1,034 | Quote:
Originally Posted by tengri khan jurchens(manchus) are not nomads, a big mistake. | Its bo_wong who mentioned manchus and nomads in the same post. He also falsely claimed they were illiterate, they adopted jurchen script from khitan script which was based on chinese characters during the jin dynasty.
| | |
| |
November 28th, 2012, 12:45 PM
|
#5 | | God of Valles Marinas
Joined: Sep 2012 From: Valles Marinas Posts: 4,262 | Quote:
Originally Posted by deke | so whats your point???? about Bo_Wong???
| | |
| |
November 28th, 2012, 06:50 PM
|
#6 | | Historian
Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,021 | Quote:
Originally Posted by tengri khan jurchens(manchus) are not nomads, a big mistake. | jurchens have two kinds, main living way is fishing and hunting, parts is nomads, sometimes parts have agricultural too.
In fact, there have historical saying to say they are half finshing and hunting, half of nomads.
on the other hand, common jurchens and manchus were viewed as two kinds of ethinic groups, although they have history relatation indeed.
| |
Last edited by fangqingming; November 28th, 2012 at 06:57 PM.
|
| |
November 29th, 2012, 12:25 AM
|
#7 | | Academician
Joined: Nov 2012 Posts: 80 |
deleted
| |
Last edited by tengri khan; November 29th, 2012 at 02:16 AM.
|
| |
November 30th, 2012, 04:46 PM
|
#8 | | Archivist
Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 136 | Quote:
Originally Posted by deke | Not only those groups, but groups from the very beginning of Chinese history, such as the Guifang of the Shang period, Beidi of the Zhou period, Rong of the Spring & Autumn and Warring States period, and so on.
At the same time, however, it is necessary to divest yourself of the notion that nomads were a race onto themselves. Nomadicism is a way of life, which was taken up by a vast diversity of peoples across the Eurasian steppes and the regions that bordered them. Not only did nomads migrate into China, but people from China also became nomads and migrated to the steppes, and this has been going on from the time nomadicism began, and indeed before it began, though in that case the 'nomads' were not nomads but just other sedentary / hunter gathering groups living in what later became nomad territory.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |