Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Asian History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Asian History Asian History Forum - China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, New Zealand, and the Asia-Pacific Region

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 13th, 2013, 06:42 PM   #1

emperor of seleucid's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2012
From: Arche Seleukeia
Posts: 2,374
Did the Manchus Ruin China

Did those savages ruin China by refusing to keep up with technology like the Ming did and by becoming so corrupt that they couldn't modernize even after like 60 years after getting humiliated.
emperor of seleucid is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 13th, 2013, 06:55 PM   #2
Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,033

I'm seriously getting freaked out by this post, this is extremely out of character, has your account been hijacked? If responses mirror the OP's language this thread wil get closed fast, and also for double posting when there is already an open thread on this topic. I'm outta here for today.
deke is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 07:07 PM   #3
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 112

Of course not,It's manvhus who bring the largest land in all dynasties china have had.
And they didn't refuse to accept new technology.They even created a new beiyang navy force.About corruption,every dynasty got very corrupt before it collapsed,it's a circle.

Last edited by tengri khan; January 13th, 2013 at 07:13 PM.
tengri khan is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 07:45 PM   #4
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 69

Well look at it this way, they extended China's landmass like never before, and vast majority of it got pass on to modern day, not a lot of empires maintain their territorial integrity like China did, the Ottomans lost most of it, all the European empire lost all of theirs. China was able to kept most of the land except Outer Mongolia. In the old days those lands were not very useful they were nothing but buffer zones, but in the modern times, every bit and piece helps, because of what is potentially hidden underground.

So in that aspect, Qing did China good, laid out good foundation for future development.
stardave is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 09:07 PM   #5
Suspended until May 15th, 2018
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,457

The later Qing dynaty did have a lot of corruption, which hurt its effort to modernize, but the Ming had its own share of corruption, which helped the Qing come to power in the first place.

I haven't any evidence presented that the Ming would have done a better job at modernizing.
Bart Dale is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 10:20 PM   #6
Joined: Feb 2011
From: Los Santos, San Andreas
Posts: 4,742

I predict this thread will turn into another "is the Qing Chinese" flamefest. Actually the OP already started it by calling the Manchus "savages".
mingming is offline  
Old January 14th, 2013, 02:37 PM   #7
Joined: Sep 2012
From: Valles Marineris, Mars
Posts: 4,833

*groan* this thread will probably end up with the similar to the other threads: Were the Ming and Yuan Chinese? and the thread Adam Smiths description of China. And Bo_Wong will start talking nonsense.
Gorge123 is offline  
Old January 15th, 2013, 02:29 AM   #8
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 92

In fact,this is a very slowly process.
as a chinese, like and love chinese culture, and learn and read chinese culture.
in chinese history, only have 2 other races dominion the chinaland.
From the Yuan(元朝) Dynasty, not only the culture strong damage , but also the institution from the open to closed, although Yuan only have 90 years.
after Yuan Dynasty. the clutre have breaks and cracks and confusion, many ancient books were lose.
although the Ming Dynasty sort out and collect the ancient books try his best, but still not back to the old lever. the institution became more and more closed.
in Qing, this dynasty inherit the Ming dynasty institution, bug became most and most closed.
i thins you all konw the chinese clutre: the poetry of the Tang Dynasty(唐诗),the poetry of the Song Dynasty, the sanqu [散曲] of the Yuan Dynasty, the novel of the Ming and Qing Dynasty.
the poetry of the Tang Dynasty and the poetry of the Song Dynasty: are all play and sing every where.
the sanqu [散曲] of the Yuan Dynasty: are all paly and sing in theater.
the novel of the Qing Dynasty: are only write , do't sing and play. when had write a rebellion meaning or rebellion word are whole families of some of those ministers executed.

although not exactlly , but this is the big trend. in upon Dynasty, from the beginning and the middle and the end , also have the same process: from the strict to the loosen.

Last edited by mybasswood; January 15th, 2013 at 02:38 AM.
mybasswood is offline  
Old January 15th, 2013, 02:39 AM   #9

Wenge's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2011
From: Virginia
Posts: 10,398

The Manchurians could not have ruined China because China did not exist as an independent entity during the Manchurian period.

Last edited by Wenge; January 15th, 2013 at 02:49 AM.
Wenge is offline  
Old January 15th, 2013, 03:06 AM   #10
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 92

Originally Posted by Wenge View Post
The Manchurians could not have ruined China because China did not exist as an independent entity during the Manchurian period.
this explain make me feel that you don't know the china history.
mybasswood is offline  

  Historum > World History Forum > Asian History

china, manchus, ruin

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Manchus and The Jurchens 1991sudarshan Asian History 92 May 10th, 2013 10:43 AM
Did the Manchus Ruin China emperor of seleucid Asian History 70 August 4th, 2012 11:02 PM
Did the Manchus disprove that 'The pen is mightier than the sword'? Jake10 Asian History 33 September 20th, 2011 04:09 PM
Could anything ruin Christianity Commander Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 13 February 10th, 2007 09:06 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.