Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Blogs > Damavand
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read


Rate this Entry

The Collapse of the Persian Sassanid Empire

Posted December 29th, 2015 at 05:31 PM by Damavand
Updated December 31st, 2015 at 04:21 AM by Damavand

The fall of the Sassanid Persian Empire was as much a result of the Persian defeat in the final Roman-Persian War of 602-628 as it was an outcome of the gradual disintegration of the socio-political regime that had held the empire together.

The Sassanid Empire was formed by an alliance between the Persian House of Sassan and the Parthian noble Houses, the latter being great feudal families who owned many large fiefdoms in the empire and provided the majority of military manpower for the Sassanid military, especially the heavy cavalry which was the backbone of the army. It was a confederacy between Persians and Parthians whereby the Sassanids were considered by the Parthian nobility to be "first amongst equals". This type of feudal regime had pros and cons of course. On the one hand, it greatly reduced the power of the Shah and made him held accountable for his actions. On the other, it allowed the nobility to have great influence on the crown and the affairs of state in general, sometimes weakening the central authority. This socio-political reality was a fertile ground for corruption, court intrigue, and tyranny, because it was formed in the first place by two powerful competing parties who vied for power, wealth, and influence: the monarchy and the nobility. In such situation it was only expected that when a Shah did not dance to the nobility's tunes, he was usually removed. Only powerful monarchs like Khosrow I were able to have a relatively free hand in running the affairs of the empire without managing to have themselves deposed.


[CENTER][IMG]http://iranpoliticsclub.net/library/english-library/222-years1/images/Rostam%20Farrokhzad%201.jpg[/IMG]
[SIZE="1"]Modern depiction of a Spahbed ("army general"), a high office often occupied by feudal lords[/SIZE][/CENTER]


The seeds of the disintegration of the socio-political regime of the Sassanid Empire were planted during the reign of the aforementioned monarch. Khosrow I is celebrated mainly for his extensive reforms. According to the new measures he introduced, the Parthian noble families were shuffled around in line with the newly introduced administrative quadripartition of the empire and the rule of the four generals. For example, members of the Parthian House of Karen, whose traditional territories were in the quarter of the west, were assigned as Spahbeds of the quarter of the east, whilst members of the House of Espahbodan, traditionally in the quarter of the east, were given the generalship of the quarter of the west. This was a very unpopular measure, because it clearly meant that one family found its territories under the rule of members from other families, sometimes rival ones. Also, Khosrow's reforms greatly interfered with the economic and military management of the Parthian realms, which had hitherto been mostly private and untouched by central authority. This greatly reduced the Parthians' ability to amass wealth at the expense of the government and put an end to their economic and military mismanagement. The Parthians would never forget what the Sassanids did under Khosrow I, since he disrupted the "natural order of things".


[CENTER][IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-sw98KaUQ9EA/VPVcMZacjUI/AAAAAAAAKZg/4MUHGFzzqzo/w426-h638/%25DB%25B1%25DB%25B2%2B%25D9%2587%25E2%2580%258D.%25D8%25B4.%2B-%2B1[/IMG]
[SIZE="1"]Modern statue of Khosrow I the Just in Tehran courthouse[/SIZE][/CENTER]


The internal chaos that began during the reign of Khosrow I's successor, Hormozd IV, made matters forever worse for the Sassanid Empire, because it paved the way for almost never ending vendettas between the House of Sassan and the Parthian noble Houses. Hormozd IV was a "tyrant", because he got sick and tired of Parthian nobles breathing down his neck and decided to purge the nobility of troublesome elements. The slaughter was great but not thorough, since Hormozd was overthrown by Bahram Chubin from the Parthian House of Mehran and two Parthian brothers from the House of Espahbodan, Vestahm and Vanduyeh, having murdered many of their brethren. Instead of installing Khosrow II on the throne, Bahram did the unthinkable and assumed kingship, usurping the divine right of the Sassanids to don the imperial crown. He was defeated by an alliance between the aforementioned Parthian brothers along with their Sassanid candidate Khosrow II and the Romans under Maurice. Sometime later, the reigning Khosrow II decided to avenge his father and murder Vanduyeh, because the latter had participated in the coup that had deposed and killed Hormozd IV, Khosrow's father and legitimate predecessor. As a result, Vestahm was enraged and decided to stage a huge rebellion in the north eastern part of the empire, and in the process he declared himself a king, greatly undermining the legitimacy of the Sassanid crown. Vestahm was later defeated and killed, and everything went back to normal for a period of time.


[CENTER][IMG]http://img.wikinut.com/img/38sudfkp337lgu18/jpeg/700x1000/Ahura-Mazda.jpeg[/IMG]
[SIZE="1"]Investiture scene of Khosrow II flanked by Mithra on the right and Lady Anahita on the left[/SIZE]


[IMG]http://www.jadidonline.com/files/files/gallery/f5a55499ddd0309a_22.jpg[/IMG]
[SIZE="1"]Khosrow II posing as an armoured horseman[/SIZE][/CENTER]


In the Roman-Persian War of 602-628 and more specifically during the phase when the Persians were on the eve of world conquest, Vanduyeh's grandson, Rostam, started a revolt in the east, some time in 624. He didn't forget Khosrow murder of his grandfather, so he stabbed his sovereign in the back in the midst of that fateful armed conflict between the superpowers of the ancient world. It became even worse, as Vanduyeh's son (and Rostam's father), Farrokh Hormozd, began plotting against Khosrow II, apparently in order to avenge his father. As if that wasn't enough, Shahrvaraz of the House of Mehran, Khosrow's conquering general in the west and a relative of the fallen usurper Bahram Chubin, threw off his allegiance to the Sassanid crown and struck a deal with both Heraclius and Farrokh Hormozd and also the latter's son, Farrokhzad (Rostam's brother). The Armenians were also involved in the conspiracy. And so during arguably one of the most crucial junctures of world history, the Roman-Parthian-Armenian alliance against Khosrow II was formed, and the result was predictable. Shahrvaraz's armies became collaborators with the Romans (part of the agreement between Shahrvaraz and Heraclius was the Persian evacuation of vast conquered Roman territories), and the only faction that resisted the counter-attacking Roman armies of Heraclius was that of general Shahin, the Spahbed of the quarter of the west. But Shahin, who would fall in battle, could not avert the distaster. The deal between the most powerful figures of the Sassanid and Roman Empires was struck, Khosrow's fate was sealed, and the war was decided before it even came to a formal end.


[CENTER][IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/Sassanian_Empire_621_A.D.jpg/640px-Sassanian_Empire_621_A.D.jpg[/IMG]
[SIZE="1"]The Empire at its greatest extent in circa 620 CE. The lands west of the traditional boundary represent short-lived Sassanid territorial expansion during the final Roman-Persian war[/SIZE][/CENTER]


There was more than just revenge which motivated the Parthian nobility during that conspiracy against their Persian sovereign lord. By attempting to make a massive territorial expansion in the west and destroying the Romans in the process, Khosrow II was about to change the balance of power within the Sassanid Empire itself in favour of the Persians. For centuries, the Parthian nobility had at their disposal vast fiefdoms that enabled them to enjoy a degree of wealth equal to that of the Sassanid Persians, and most importantly, it gave them access to a superior manpower pool from which they could muster troops loyal to them as feudal lords. This gave the Parthian nobility an advantage over the Persian Sassanids and allowed them to wield great power and influence. Khosrow II was attempting to tip this internal balance of power in favour of the Persians, and he did so by unleashing a total war of conquest on the Romans with the aim of securing access to vast lands and resources under Roman rule. A Persian success in that war would have enabled the House of Sassan to challenge the Parthian noble Houses in terms of territory, wealth, and manpower, since the conquered lands would have become under the direct jurisdiction of the Persians, unlike the Parthian fiefdoms. The Parthian nobility must have realised this later on, and since Khosrow II was pursuing his agenda using mostly "Parthian resources", a coup was deemed necessary. This of course was facilitated by the troubled history of the Sassanids and their Parthian subjects.

A period of utter chaos followed the deposition of Khosrow II and the Persian defeat in the final war. The alliance that had brought down Khosrow disintegrated, and the Persian Sassanid Empire was divided into 3 factions as a result, each of which competing for power and influence at the imperial court: 1) the "conquest" faction of general Shahrvaraz, 2) the Parthian faction led by the Espahbodan family (Farrokh Hormozd and his sons Farrokhzad and Rostam), and 3) the Persian faction, backed by the Parthian House of Suren. In addition to these factions, petty pretenders to the throne started appearing in the Empire and minting their own coins, most of whom were rogue military commanders.

After the fall of Khosrow II, first Kavad II was installed in 628. He was a puppet who ruled for few months before he died because of unknown reasons, most likely a plague. Ardashir III (628-630) came after him. He was a child, and since he was installed on the throne by the other factions without consulting Shahrvaraz, the child was murdered by the rebellious general who afterwards assumed kingship for very short period of time before getting assassinated by the Parthian faction. Borandokht (631) was crowned as empress with the blessing of the Parthian faction. Because she was not favoured by the Persian faction, she was deposed, and her sister Azarmidokht (632) was crowned. Farrokh Hormozd asked the empress's hand in marriage in a smart political move, but she had him killed. His son Rostam became furious, and decided to lead an army all the way from the north east to the capital, defeating every army Azarmidohkt threw at him along the way. Not surprisingly, he arrived and killed the empress, avenging his father. Borandokht was installed once again, but after a short reign she died. And so the last Shahanshah of the Sassanid dynasty and the last Zoroastrian emperor in Iranian history, Yazdgerd III, was crowned in 633 in a fire temple in the old capital of the Sassanid Empire, Estakhr. He inherited an almost disintegrated empire in complete chaos, one that was also being attacked by the Arab forces of Islam pouring out of the Arabian desert. This chaotic situation was an accumulation of centuries of Persian-Parthian antagonism, made worse by Khosrow I, Hormozd IV, and Khosrow II. The whole socio-political structure of the Sassanid Empire was teetering.

In order to contextualise the fall of the Sassanid Empire at the hand of the Arab Muslims, we have to take the above into consideration. When the Arabs first attacked the Sassanids, it happened in the Battle of Ubullah in 628*, shortly after the end of the Roman-Persian War and during the reign of the child king Ardashir III, when the Persian-Parthian confederacy was disintegrating and when the empire was consumed by chaos and divided into 3 different faction, a division that also extended to the military. This meant that the power of the central authority was non-existent. The military effort against the invading Arabs lacked determination, coherence, consistency, and strength. There was no concentrated and coordinated war effort against the Arabs, and therefore no serious attempt at putting an end to the threat. The "leadership" of the Sassanid Empire was fragmented, and decision-makers were busy vying for power and influence. To them, the invading Arabs were a secondary issue. Therefore, the task of defending the realm was mostly left to the forces stationed at the frontier and led by petty commanders, the Marzbans.

Four battles were fought during the reign of Ardashir III (628-630): Ubullah, Dhat al-salasel, Madhar, and Ullays. All of them ended in Persian defeat. During the short reign of the usurper Shahrvaraz (630), seven engagements took place between Persians and Arabs: Maqr, Veh Ardashir, Anbar, Ayn Tamr, Dumat al-Jandal, Husayd, and Firad. Again, Persian defeat was the outcome of them all. Then came the first reign of Borandokht (631) in which three battle occurred: Namariq, Kaskar, and Buwayb. As usual, Persian defeat in every engagement. The first and the last decisive Persian victory against the Arabs was achieved in the Battle of the Bridge during Borandokht's second reign (632).

All the previously-mentioned battles except the last one took place when there was no unified leadership in the Sassanid Empire, no decisive plan of military action. They occurred whilst the Sassanid factions were competing with each other for power, whilst Shahrvaraz had a vast army at his disposal doing nothing, whilst he was usurping the throne, whilst Rostam was marching and fighting against the central armies of Azarmidokht, and whilst the military was further divided by individual rogue commanders who assumed kingship. Considering the events that were transpiring in the Sassanid Empire at the same time when the Arabs were scoring one victory after another, the picture becomes clearer. The victory in the Battle of the Bridge was only achieved because of unified Sassanid leadership and due to luck (Arab commander got stomped by an elephant, causing an Arab route). During the second reign of Borandokht, the leading figures of the Sassanid Empire decided to put aside their differences and decisively deal with the situation they found themselves in. This led to the first serious coordinated and concentrated Persian military effort against the Arabs, and the result was a victory on the battlefield in the aforementioned battle. But still, when the Arabs were retreating during the battle and the Persians were about to finish them off, according to Islamic sources news reached the Sassanid commanders (amongst them was Rostam) that there was a serious revolt back home that threatened to undermine the agreement between the leading factions. The Persians stopped their pursuit of the fleeing Arabs, preventing a massacre that could have had serious effects on the Arab war effort, though the defeat demoralised the Arabs and made them go quiet for nearly three years.

But that battle did not save the already doomed Sassanid Empire from ultimate destruction, because in 635 the Sassanid army was decimated in the Battle of Qadisiyyah, and the most powerful man in the empire at that time, Rostam, was killed in action. The path to Ctesiphon was opened for the Arabs as a result, and the city fell in their hands. Since Rostam was now dead and there was no-one of similar status left in the Empire except his brother Farrokhzad, the Arab Conquest was greatly facilitated. After the massive defeat, the people were greatly demoralised, and it's not an exaggeration to say that they lost hope for ultimate victory.

The last serious stand of the Sassanid Empire was in Nehavand in 642. Because the Arabs had been victorious, the Sassanid military exhausted, and spirits were low, the Persians failed again, and with that failure the back of the Sassanid military was broken once and for all. Afterwards, the total Arab conquest of the Sassanid Empire became pretty much inevitable. The Iranian people began to either submit without a fight, fight without hope, or commit treason by defecting to the Arabs in order to save their skin (and to some defectors, their status). Even Farrokhzad, Rostam's brother whose task was escorting the fleeing Yazdgerd III, defected to the Arabs and left the unfortunate Shah alone without allies. Yazdgerd was killed in Marv in 652 by people who realised that the Sassanid dynasty was already a thing of the past.

The reasons behind the fall of the Sassanid Empire were varied. In addition to the disintegration of the socio-political regime mentioned above, the severe military exhaustion caused by the Sassanid failure in the War of 602-628 led to a decline in the quality of most Iranian troops that fought the Arab Muslims, since a great number of experienced soldiers and officers had perished in the aforementioned war. The loss of many military personnel in that armed conflict also created a shortage of Iranian manpower during the Arab Conquest, greatly hindering the Sassanid military effort against the Arabs. A great reliance on foreign mercenaries to remedy that problem was not possible, since the Empire was also experiencing a sharp economic decline due to Khosrow II's total war against the Romans, making mercenary payment very difficult for the Empire. Overall mental exhaustion from constant warfare for decades should also not be ruled out, as it must have greatly affected the morale of soldiers and civilians alike, shattering their will resist, made worse by the extreme fatalistic mindset of the people at that time. All of these problems facing the Sassanid Empire during the Arab Conquest were compounded by an outbreak of plague that ravaged parts of the Empire, contributing to decline of morale, economy, and population.

A multitude of factors made the Sassanid attempt at rescuing Iran from the Islamic onslaught very difficult indeed. In hindsight, it seems as if Iranian defeat in the Arab Conquest was inevitable.

________________________________________

[SIZE="1"]* I subscribe to the thesis of Dr. Parvaneh Pourshariati that convincingly argues in favour of 628 CE as the year of the start of the Arab Conquest of the Sassanid Empire. Traditional historiography points at 633 CE, but in my opinion that is unlikely.[/SIZE]
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 0

Comments

 

Remove Ads


Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.