NDAA temporally struck down
Posted May 20th, 2012 at 05:26 PM by larkin
This is a repeat comment to your Chis Hedges piece from this morning..
Hedges, Elsberg, Chomsky and West are genuine heroes but the work is far from done. The higher courts, especially the Supreme court has already been subverted and will not strike down the NDAA so easily.
The economic downturn is much greater than we have been told and principals believe that we are in for social upheaval and possibly chaos.
Over the last 10 years, precipitating in a growing economic collapse, the Government has refused to intervene in the housing foreclosure crisis, the exportation of jobs and manufacturing, onerous banking practice and Wall Street's malfeasance.
This Government has shown where its loyalties lay by quietly arming itself against its own population.
Instead it has decided to pass laws equivocating decent with terrorism and militarize police forces across the country with hardware and expertise designed to quell rebellion.
The real danger of the NDAA is that it deputizes local police forces on behalf of the military. In any revolution the real danger to the established rulers is the fear that the police will changes sides. They cannot do this with the military at their backs.
A confirmation of these fears will gradually occur in the coming months by labeling governmental opposition as home-grown terrorists justifying harsh military tactics.
We are already, toast..
Larkin
Hedges, Elsberg, Chomsky and West are genuine heroes but the work is far from done. The higher courts, especially the Supreme court has already been subverted and will not strike down the NDAA so easily.
The economic downturn is much greater than we have been told and principals believe that we are in for social upheaval and possibly chaos.
Over the last 10 years, precipitating in a growing economic collapse, the Government has refused to intervene in the housing foreclosure crisis, the exportation of jobs and manufacturing, onerous banking practice and Wall Street's malfeasance.
This Government has shown where its loyalties lay by quietly arming itself against its own population.
Instead it has decided to pass laws equivocating decent with terrorism and militarize police forces across the country with hardware and expertise designed to quell rebellion.
The real danger of the NDAA is that it deputizes local police forces on behalf of the military. In any revolution the real danger to the established rulers is the fear that the police will changes sides. They cannot do this with the military at their backs.
A confirmation of these fears will gradually occur in the coming months by labeling governmental opposition as home-grown terrorists justifying harsh military tactics.
We are already, toast..
Larkin
Total Comments 1
Comments
-
Bah! Well, this shows where the loyalty of the Supreme Court lies at! Real judges would have struck down this Unconstitutional law!Posted May 20th, 2012 at 08:50 PM by Shinobu Sensui
