Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > European History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

European History European History Forum - Western and Eastern Europe including the British Isles, Scandinavia, Russia


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 12th, 2016, 04:35 PM   #151

Xilaw's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2015
From: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 1,507

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ao Shin View Post
Come on man, in those censuses boycotts are a common thing. Albanians have always had higher fertility rates than Serbs. Plus the last one only counts south Kosovo, leaving out North Kosovo. As a guy who acts like wants only to find out the truth, you act pretty biased.
Seriously, how many Serbs do you think are left? You think Albanians went from 47% to +- 90% just by their high fertility rate? That's insane. Especially if you consider the fact Serbs had a high fertility rate themselves until fairly recently in these less advanced areas, e.g my grandparents on my mother's side had 10 siblings each living in the mountainous and forested areas of Lika, Croatia. My father's side in Bosnia had somewhat less, 5-6 siblings. Now then, this was around 40s and 50s of the past century. How much do you think Serbs had children in Kosovo in the 1800s, one of the poorest regions of ex-Yugoslavia? Albanians may have had more children on average but the rift was certainly not as large as it is today. Certainly not enough to make Serbs go from 43% to less than 2%(?) in a 100 years.
Xilaw is offline  
Remove Ads
Old August 12th, 2016, 05:03 PM   #152

GasMask's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: May 2016
From: Antartica
Posts: 217

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ao Shin View Post
Try to find out reliable sources instead, you'll have a hard time, time to get in touch with reality.
Quick question: why are Serbian sources automatically false, but others arent? What are reliable sources in your opinion?
GasMask is offline  
Old August 12th, 2016, 05:17 PM   #153

Tsar's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Apr 2015
From: Serbia
Posts: 1,843
Blog Entries: 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ao Shin View Post
@Tsar

Please top spamming the forum with the official Serb historiography,
Had you spent more than 30 seconds to read my "spam", you would have noticed that any of the sources aren't Serbian (Ranke, Austrian and Russian consuls...) and/or rely mostly on non-Serbian sources, and/or are primary sources. Just because you don't like them, doesn't mean they're not true.


Quote:
I can do the same with the Albanian one, it says you guys are nomads who came in the Balkans not that early.
As you would have noticed had you spent more time on text and less on the author's nationality you would have noticed that the "spam" was my reply to the post of King Kong regarding the 19th century and the battle of Kosovo. In any case you're free to post whatever you want.

The empty phraseology at the end of your post doesn't even deserve a proper reply.
Tsar is offline  
Old August 12th, 2016, 05:44 PM   #154
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Jul 2016
From: Europe
Posts: 73

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xilaw View Post
Seriously, how many Serbs do you think are left? You think Albanians went from 47% to +- 90% just by their high fertility rate? That's insane. Especially if you consider the fact Serbs had a high fertility rate themselves until fairly recently in these less advanced areas, e.g my grandparents on my mother's side had 10 siblings each living in the mountainous and forested areas of Lika, Croatia. My father's side in Bosnia had somewhat less, 5-6 siblings. Now then, this was around 40s and 50s of the past century. How much do you think Serbs had children in Kosovo in the 1800s, one of the poorest regions of ex-Yugoslavia? Albanians may have had more children on average but the rift was certainly not as large as it is today. Certainly not enough to make Serbs go from 43% to less than 2%(?) in a 100 years.
Focus, first most of those censuses were taken under Yugoslavia which was well known for Slavo-centrism and even anti-Albanianism. So the number of the Serbs might have been exaggerated greatly. Second the last of the censuses is crazy low for a few reasons. It only counts the part of Kosovo which is outside North Kosovo were the Serbs are almost entirely based. Second, a large part of Serbs boycotted this census. Third, Albanians living abroad registered themselves in the census, I highly doubt Serbs living abroad did. Fourth, all authorities involved in it could speak Albanian, but not all could speak Serbian, so maybe there were misunderstandings. Finally a lot of Albanians who fled Yugoslavia during 45-92 era applied for Kosovan citizenship, I highly doubt the Serbs of Kosovo who left during this time applied for Kosovan citizenship. Be smart, if you go in the north of Kosovo, 99% are Serbs. That alone tells you that the number of ethnic Serbs is almost identical in percentage compared to the Albanians, to what it used to be in 1991.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GasMask View Post
Quick question: why are Serbian sources automatically false, but others arent? What are reliable sources in your opinion?
In history there's no such thing as X or Y sources, you only have factual or non-factual sources, and yes the Serb historiography is pure garbage based on nationalism with zero facts in it. I challenge you to read those books again and find the sources that they use, do it, lets see.
Ao Shin is offline  
Old August 12th, 2016, 06:08 PM   #155

Tsar's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Apr 2015
From: Serbia
Posts: 1,843
Blog Entries: 3

@Ao Shin

Sorry to hear that you're so disappointed with Serbian historiography, could you tell us what works have you read and which ones make you conclude so?
Tsar is offline  
Old February 11th, 2017, 06:47 AM   #156

Drini's Avatar
Citizen
 
Joined: Jan 2017
From: Germany
Posts: 37

Historical speaking Kosovo is only one of hundreds of countries that are displaced for reasons of wars. The most recent war that gave Serbs the places they own today is the Balkanic wars. As far as we know Albania was the big loser from this war.
Unfortunately today there are no "fair-borders" and only war can change them again. And it well known that the winners of wars write always the history.
Considering this truth there is no point discussing which belongs where.
In my opinion worth discussing is how we get in this situations. How tribes have moved in ages and the extensions of these moves. I think this can be the way we could know the origin of peoples and what a country really can be.
Drini is offline  
Old February 11th, 2017, 07:08 AM   #157

Maki's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2017
From: Republika Srpska
Posts: 1,754

The reason why Kosovo is so important to Serbia is that the medieval battle of Kosovo is the most important event in Serbian history. It's the stone on which the Serbian patriotism and pride is built upon, many songs have been written about that event, the battle reached an almost mythical status for the Serbs. Combine that with the fact that Kosovo was the center of medieval Serbian state and that many Serbian monasteries and churches such as Pećka Patrijaršija and Visoki Dečani are located in Kosovo, it's not hard to see why is Kosovo so important to Serbia.
Maki is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > European History

Tags
join, kosovo, land, makes, serbia, serbian



Search tags for this page
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Land, Black Land. Is it a good book? Thessalonian History Book Reviews 3 August 22nd, 2011 01:04 PM
Kosovo from a Serbian Historian's Perspective crossroadclarence European History 60 December 26th, 2009 02:09 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.