Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > European History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

European History European History Forum - Western and Eastern Europe including the British Isles, Scandinavia, Russia

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 9th, 2011, 01:58 PM   #1
Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Sep 2010
From: Somewhere in the former First French Empire
Posts: 3,538
Henry VIII Anglicanism: Purely for the sake of divorce or was he really a reformer?

I wonder did the English got their church just because Henry VIII otherwise couldn't get his divorce or was he really a reformer?

If it was just for the sake of divorce and King Henry VIII would never have existed. Would England then still be a Catholic nation?
jeroenrottgering is offline  
Remove Ads
Old April 9th, 2011, 05:44 PM   #2

Pancho35's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Newfoundland
Posts: 1,946

Yeh I think it is widely agreed it was just so he could get a divorce. The Church of England was very catholicish, despite being a protestant religion. It would seem that Henry didn't have a problem with catholicism, just the pope not annulling his marriage. I think Henry was a bit like Elizabeth where he didn't really care about religion.
Pancho35 is offline  
Old April 9th, 2011, 05:54 PM   #3

Richard Stanbery's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Tennessee
Posts: 8,298

Possibly so. But, maybe he felt some remorse or sense of guilt/ responsibility for what he had done, and in later years actually started to try and take a guiding hand in the Anglican Church for its general welfare?

The whole thing reminds of of a twisted (its English, after all) version of David and Bathsheba. Only he didnt have a husband killed. He tore a nation from a Church, and then killed his "Bathsheba".

But I think that England had protestant leanings well before Henrys time.
Richard Stanbery is offline  
Old April 9th, 2011, 11:22 PM   #4

Belloc's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2010
From: USA
Posts: 5,418

He mostly just wanted a Catholic church under his control. The "reformation" in England didn't really start until after Henry's death. Lutherans were burned at the stake as much as Catholics at this time.
Belloc is offline  
Old April 10th, 2011, 12:12 AM   #5

Louise C's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
From: Southeast England
Posts: 7,239

Not just divorce, he wanted to get his hands on the wealth of the church as well.

The destruction of the monasteries was one of the horrific aspects of his reign. A whole way of life destroyed, and the common people suffered because monasteries provided welfare to the local poor. And thousands of valuable medieval manuscripts were destroyed too. It was a wicked business.

He wasn't really a Protestant though, and persecuted Protestant heretics as well as Catholics who opposed him. Outside of London and the south east, England remained largely Catholic until the reign of Elizabeth I.
Louise C is offline  
Old April 10th, 2011, 01:54 AM   #6

History Chick's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2010
From: Colorado Springs (PA at heart)
Posts: 3,188

I don't think it was just the divorce but I do think it was for political, not spiritual reasons. I truly think Henry considered himself spiritually Catholic his whole life, he just wanted absolute political control in his realm.
History Chick is offline  
Old April 10th, 2011, 02:43 AM   #7

bolero982's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2010
From: Rhondda, South Wales
Posts: 399

Henry was at one time declared Defender of the Faith by the Pope for his book 'Assertio Septem Sacramentorum'...a book supporting, amongst other things, the supremacy of the Pope. Henry was no protestant, and really his own power and advantage are most likely what drove him in all things. Of course his divorce would have played a part in that and one does wonder what would have happened if Henry had been granted an annulment, but afterwards Henry clearly took advantage of the politics of the reformation to add to his own power and wealth.
bolero982 is offline  
Old April 10th, 2011, 07:43 AM   #8

Toltec's Avatar
Fiddling as Rome Burns
Joined: Apr 2008
From: Hyperborea
Posts: 7,923

Initially it was mostly because it was the only way he could get a divorce, but also it flattered his considerable ego that he would be head of the new church.

I don't think he envisaged a protestant reformation, rather an English Catholic church with him at the head. However those around him such as Cromwell and the Boleyn's had other plans. When the money started pouring in from the dissolution of the monastries, drunk on his new wealth and power he got swept into the more radical reform his advisors wanted. Then when the people began to oppose and rebel against him, this hardened him to the reform view.

Basically he agreed to minor reform and got caught in a Tsunami, a better man may have not.
Toltec is offline  
Old April 10th, 2011, 08:02 AM   #9

Richard Stanbery's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Tennessee
Posts: 8,298

Why did he see the need to destroy the ancient records and manuscripts in the monsateries? Why was that done?
Richard Stanbery is offline  
Old April 10th, 2011, 09:14 AM   #10
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,011

It seems that Henry squandered much of the confiscated wealth of the Monasteries in his 1540s dreams of martial glory. I don't think he had a protestant bone on his body, and he was anxious for alliance with Catholic Emperor Charles V at that time. It was political with Henry.

The dissolution of the Monasteries caused hardship among some common people since those religious houses were where many of them were able to get medical attention (such as it was) and alms. Once the Monasteries were reduced, those important social services went away for the poor. The social disturbances of the late 1540s were one result.

Henry was no reformer, nor IMO was he religious in any serious way. I have always thought of H-viij as a wastrel and an egomaniac. He did substantial harm to the Realm.
pikeshot1600 is offline  

  Historum > World History Forum > European History

anglicanism, deforce, henry, pure, reformer, sake, viii

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How is Henry VIII Viewed? tjadams European History 80 December 12th, 2010 07:03 AM
Henry VIII & the American Revolution tjadams Speculative History 7 August 29th, 2010 08:32 AM
A Random Question about Henry VIII HistoryFreak1912 European History 9 January 26th, 2010 02:19 PM
Henry VIII & printing press aldavey History Help 4 October 1st, 2009 01:29 AM
Was Henry VIII psycho? kahn European History 31 May 11th, 2008 05:23 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.