Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > European History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

European History European History Forum - Western and Eastern Europe including the British Isles, Scandinavia, Russia


View Poll Results: Would WW1 have happened if Victoria was still Queen?
Yes 10 83.33%
No 0 0%
Maybe 1 8.33%
Other 1 8.33%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:13 AM   #1

pbl1998's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
From: Woking, Surrey, England
Posts: 952
Would WW1 have happened if Victoria was still Queen of England?


Hi,

I was just wondering what you thought of the question:

Would WW1 have happened if Queen Victoria was still Queen?

The reason behind me asking this question is because of Albert. Would she felt differently than George V about the German nation because the Kaiser was her grandson and Albert was German and her loved husband.

Thanks,
pbl1998
pbl1998 is offline  
Remove Ads
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:24 AM   #2

Kevinmeath's Avatar
Acting Corporal
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Navan, Ireland
Posts: 5,342

Her husband had been dead sometime and anyway by 1914 I don't think the Monarch had much say, especially as she would have been a very old lady.
Kevinmeath is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:24 AM   #3

Mischef_Managed's Avatar
Academician
 
Joined: Nov 2011
From: Illinois
Posts: 85

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbl1998 View Post
Hi,

I was just wondering what you thought of the question:

Would WW1 have happened if Queen Victoria was still Queen?

The reason behind me asking this question is because of Albert. Would she felt differently than George V about the German nation because the Kaiser was her grandson and Albert was German and her loved husband.

Thanks,
pbl1998
A big problem with your idea is that World War I was based purely on German imperialism. That's not so, a big precursor to the war was the Balkan Wars with Serbia and Bulgaria. Franz Ferdinand's murder is what began the war.
Mischef_Managed is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:35 AM   #4

Montcalm's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Paris
Posts: 156

Hello,

I voted "other". We simply can't know, but yes, probably. One of the main reasons for war was the continued Franco-German rivalry about Alsace, Anglo-German trade and naval competition and the Prussian's strategists will to disable Russia before it's rise. Would Queen Victoria have changed this ? No. But then again I am no expert of her personality.
Montcalm is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 10:37 AM   #5

DreamWeaver's Avatar
Misanthropologist
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Wales
Posts: 8,535
Blog Entries: 5

I fail to see how Queen Vic could have had a determined effect upon British and European Policy to avert the outcome of 1914. Sometimes events and the forces of society are greater than any one individual.
DreamWeaver is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 03:43 PM   #6
Citizen
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Northumbria
Posts: 7

I get the impression that the royal families of everywhere in Europe have always been related and it's never stopped them being enemies.
I shall probably get shot down for suggesting that some major European wars were family arguments.
glenberro is offline  
Old December 20th, 2011, 03:53 PM   #7

Corbulo's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Oct 2010
From: Belfast
Posts: 218

I suppose Granny might have had a quiet word in her grandsons ears but I doubt it would have had much influence on subsequent events. I dont think the war was inevitable but I have to agree with Niall Ferguson surmation that had Britain stayed out then we may have seen an ealier version of the EEC in the wake of a German victory. His arguments seem pretty convincing. I will let you judge for yourselves.
Corbulo is offline  
Old December 22nd, 2011, 07:16 AM   #8

SirOrmondeWinter's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,200

Yes, George the Fifth did everything he could to stop the war and I doubt Queen Victoria would have fared any better
SirOrmondeWinter is offline  
Old December 23rd, 2011, 07:30 AM   #9

shivfan's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Hertfordshire
Posts: 709

Monarchs had little power to influence policy, which was more and more in the hands of prime ministers....

That's been the case since the Hanoverians sat on the throne, IMHO.
shivfan is offline  
Old December 23rd, 2011, 07:56 AM   #10

Ancientgeezer's Avatar
Revisionist
 
Joined: Nov 2011
From: Closer to Calais than to Birmingham
Posts: 3,631

There were several attempts to forge an Anglo-German alliance in the late 19th Century which were always rebuffed by the Kaiser. The alternative, an entente, (but not an alliance) with France was only approached after several provocative German acts and statements in the 1900-1910 period.
Ancientgeezer is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > European History

Tags
family, royal, victoria, war, ww1


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tales of Queen Victoria by Eyewitnesses crossroadclarence European History 3 September 6th, 2011 04:15 AM
voice of queen Victoria bartieboy European History 4 May 22nd, 2011 04:21 AM
Power of current Queen of England hiplikebrando European History 21 June 14th, 2010 12:43 PM
Queen Victoria moonshadow European History 30 May 23rd, 2010 01:50 PM
Isabella-She Wolf of France Queen of England Tudor chick Medieval and Byzantine History 4 August 10th, 2009 05:25 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.