Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > European History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

European History European History Forum - Western and Eastern Europe including the British Isles, Scandinavia, Russia


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 5th, 2012, 11:04 PM   #11

RusEvo's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,390

D-Day was a very difficult operation, against France which is only a couple of hundred miles away....... how hard would a cross Atlantic invasion be by comparison?? Too hard and too much to loose. Wouldnt happen.
RusEvo is offline  
Remove Ads
Old October 5th, 2012, 11:16 PM   #12

viking's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Apr 2011
From: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,461

America's attitude to Britain in 1940 was not clear. People like FDR were in support but others, like Joseph Kennedy were anti British. Britain out of the war would have solved that problem and America could turn to it's Pacific interests.
How the Empire would have responded is almost geographical. Canada would have considered itself part of the North American continent. Australia/NewZealand was acutely aware of the possible threat of Japanese South East Asia expansion. Being so far way from Britain it would have had to align with American interests as the only option of protection. It is possible that America would have protected Australia, not out of concern for Australia, but it's loss would have robbed America of a useful base.
viking is offline  
Old November 9th, 2012, 10:05 AM   #13

Jinit's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2012
From: India
Posts: 3,237
Blog Entries: 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancientgeezer View Post
Yes, there were such plans for evacuation to Canada which would have included most of the government and whatever components of the fleet that remained. Churchill was determined to stay however and even drew up fanciful plans how he and other portly politicians and civil servants would man machine guns around Downing Street and the Palace of Westminster.
The evacuation of the Royal Family was actually rehearsed at least once with a special train taking them to Madresfield Court in Malvern, Worcester and Pitchford Hall in Shropshire where other exiled monarchs would join them. Britain was well set up for armed resistance to a German Invasion and a subsequent guerilla war with an "underground" government and army already organised, so instant evacuation out of the country was not thought advisable for morale purposes. The Queen and the Princesss and the King's Brothers would have left on seperate warships, with the King leaving last of all, some from Liverpool and the King probably from Belfast.
It is highly unlikely that Britain would have surrendered in the manner of France of Belgium. The model was Poland, where even though the military surrendered, the government remained at war.
The Dominions had all declared war on Germany independently and were unlikely to make peace as long as there was the chance of the USA joining the war.

Besides If IIRC Churchill secretely transported the National treasury of Britain to the Canada, which althaugh a dangerous decision prooved quite beneficial for the Britain.
Jinit is online now  
Old November 9th, 2012, 10:08 AM   #14
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 19,934

Quote:
Originally Posted by betgo View Post
Might be better for alternative history.
That's a good point IMHO.
sylla1 is offline  
Old November 9th, 2012, 11:46 AM   #15

Scaeva's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,547

The British government would have fled to Canada and would have continued the war in exile.

But this scenario requires that we assume that Germany could successfully invade Britain, which is really within the realm of fantasy. Operation Sea Lion was a farce. Besides the fact that Britain had naval superiority, even if the Royal Navy were to have vanished Germany did not possess enough troop transports, merchant ships and landing craft to ferry an invasion force across the Channel. Hitler's plans for an invasion of Britain were delusional from the beginning.
Scaeva is offline  
Old November 10th, 2012, 04:10 AM   #16
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Nov 2011
From: Bolton, UK
Posts: 1,749

If Britain had been invaded it still would have continued the fight against Germany. The British Government would have moved to Canada and continued the war from there.
Brunel is offline  
Old November 12th, 2012, 11:07 AM   #17

Kyuu's Avatar
Citizen
 
Joined: Nov 2012
From: Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan
Posts: 5

I would have thought that it would be obvious that the royal family would have been moved to Britain if England were ever in any true danger.

Canada did, after all, accept and care for the Royal Family of Belgium while they were in exile, when Belgium was under Nazi control. If they would support an ally like Belgium, it's obvious they would support Great Britain, who was past 'ally' and closer to 'family'.
Kyuu is offline  
Old November 19th, 2012, 11:12 AM   #18
Citizen
 
Joined: Nov 2012
From: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 18
Exclamation Canada/Australia in the event Britain was invaded by Germany?


If operation Sea Lion (German landing on the British mainland) would have been carried out, I guess that Britain would have reacted similar to the French when occupied. They would have evacuated all the important figures (Royal Family, Winston Churchill and so on) to Canada or even the small island of Malta. From there the resistance to the Axis powers would have been upheld and organized and led. This would have been a great blow to British war industry and war effort and it would have effected British morale in a very negative way. I am not sure whether the allies would have still won the second World War even with the help of the United States of America.
PinkPanter456 is offline  
Old November 19th, 2012, 06:19 PM   #19
Scholar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 620

Canadian Prime Minister McKenzie King and President Roosevelt actually discussed what use would be made of the Royal Navy ships coming to Canada in 1940-that is historical fact.
Equally, Australia after the fall of Singapore sought increasingly to draw closer military, political and diplomatic links with the USA as it became brutally clear that belegured Britain could do littel to help Australia against thretened Japanese invasion in 1942.
Ne Zealand remained fiercly loyal to Britain and the Royal family and would have done so had Britan fallen in 1940 to the Nazis.
Re Canada the person who expressed doubts about the British government being welcome in Canada is -with respect-talikng nonsense.
Canada had a Governor General ansrable to the British monarch so no issue would havec arisen about the British government coming to Canada except perhaps among pro Vichy French Canadians -who were not ruling Canada during the war.
One worry might have been how the Giovernor-General of the British Bahanmas -the pro- Nazi Duke of Windsor- might have reacted to a Nazi offer to fill the British throne vacated by his Brother George VI. as a Nazi puppet king in Nazi occupied Britain.
Far fetched? -not at al!-l that's exactly why the former Edward VIII and his twice divorced Baltimore American babe, Mrs Simpson , were shipped of to the Bahamas in 1940 from Britain.
Toomtabard is offline  
Old November 25th, 2012, 01:11 PM   #20

motorbike's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Jul 2012
From: Australia
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 2

It was clear at the outbreak of WW2 that England could not defend Australia in face of the growing threat of Japan - many Australians (lead by the Labor Party) opposed Australia sending troops to Europe/Middle East in 1939 arguing that they were needed at home. They were promptly brought back after Peral harbour, an act Churchill considered bordering on high treason. USA was the only saviour for Australia (and as Churchill privately accepted, for Britain and Europe as well). Furthermore, Australia was the only safe place for a base to launch the counter-attack on Japan.
The problem for Australia of a fall of the United Kingdom would be constitutional - the Head of State is the Governor General, appointed by the British Monarch on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister. Its the GG's signature that makes parliamentary acts legal. If Britain falls and the monarchy and government go into exile and continue the opposition to Germany, no real problem. But if the monarchy is killed and or the government cannot continue in exile, then Australia has a constitutional problem when the encumbant GG dies. Necessity of circumstances would lead to a solution - grab whatever royal you can and make them the direct Australian monarch or perhaps become a republic.
motorbike is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > European History

Tags
britain, canada or australia, event, germany, invaded


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If Germany had invaded Britain 1940? Celticguy Speculative History 41 July 19th, 2014 06:17 AM
If Britain had been invaded in 1940 Bish Speculative History 40 January 19th, 2012 03:36 PM
WWII_Could Japan navy invaded Britain? Perix Speculative History 16 October 6th, 2010 12:02 AM
Last century the Great Britain invaded Latvia Lauma European History 3 August 20th, 2010 12:32 AM
Canada vs Australia Toltec Speculative History 33 November 13th, 2009 08:15 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.