Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 25th, 2011, 10:48 PM   #11

The Imperial's Avatar
Panther Rider
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: 3rd rock from Sol
Posts: 4,168
Blog Entries: 1

OMG! Wow!!

Look at how much we have improved! Well we could stack a hundred Tririme into the USS Nimitz!!
The Imperial is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 25th, 2011, 11:10 PM   #12

RoyalGovnaWatts's Avatar
Drinker of Tea
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: California
Posts: 2,278
Blog Entries: 2

Great chart, Phil. Would love to see more. Maybe one on the evolution of the Roman or Greek military? Just a suggestion.
RoyalGovnaWatts is offline  
Old January 25th, 2011, 11:44 PM   #13

plutoboyz's Avatar
لانون د توجوه سامودرا
 
Joined: Sep 2009
From: Raiding ship at Malaccan strait
Posts: 5,426

Great Chart, philehellene!

but I would love if you add Sriwijayan Warship. average length is about 65-70 meters.
plutoboyz is offline  
Old January 26th, 2011, 01:16 AM   #14

flaxman's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: England
Posts: 723

Great chart and the graphics are so clear.

Funnily enough I was watching a documentary last night which featured the SS Great Eastern. She was the biggest ship in the world when she was built in 1858 by Isambard Kingdom Brunel. She had the capacity to carry 4000 passengers. She was eventually broken up in 1889 but because she was so well built it took just over two years to complete the task. The breakers lost a lot of money on her.
flaxman is offline  
Old January 26th, 2011, 03:24 AM   #15

pablo668's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Apr 2010
From: Perth, Western Australia. or....hickville.
Posts: 1,803

Maybe it's just me......actually I know it's just me. It irks me seeing the Ark on there. It's not a historical vessel, or has never been definitively proven to be one.


It's a great chart, don't get me wrong, I just think the Ark shouldn't be there.
pablo668 is offline  
Old January 26th, 2011, 03:29 AM   #16

tjadams's Avatar
Epicurean
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Texas
Posts: 23,825
Blog Entries: 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by pablo668 View Post
Maybe it's just me......actually I know it's just me. It irks me seeing the Ark on there. It's not a historical vessel, or has never been definitively proven to be one.

It's a great chart, don't get me wrong, I just think the Ark shouldn't be there.
The Bible gives the dimensions of the boat, real or not. Squint and pretend its something else.
tjadams is online now  
Old January 26th, 2011, 03:32 AM   #17

pablo668's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Apr 2010
From: Perth, Western Australia. or....hickville.
Posts: 1,803

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjadams View Post
The Bible gives the dimensions of the boat, real or not. Squint and pretend its something else.
Hmmpf bah humbug, no it's not that bad, just irksome.
pablo668 is offline  
Old January 26th, 2011, 04:03 AM   #18

philhellene's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Ηνωμένες Πολιτείεs
Posts: 976

Okay, thanks for the support and feedback guys, glad you like.

And yes, there were a number of ways I could have expanded this, I was thinking about an Ohio class US sub, or the Yamato, or the Dreadnought, etc. There are certainly many other ships I would like to and can explore, maybe I can work on them next.

And yes, tee hee, the Ark is a kind of tongue in cheek one that I just threw in for giggles. I think it is very clear that the ark was never real and intended to be metaphorical/symbolic.


"The Ark is 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high, and it had three decks; it is therefore three times the height of the Tabernacle and three times the area of the Tabernacle forecourt, suggesting that the biblical authors saw both structures serving the same purpose, the preservation of humankind for God's plan.[29] The dimensions betray a numerological preoccupation with the number sixty, one which it shares with the Babylonian Ark: 60x5=300 cubits long and 60÷2=30 cubits high.[30]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah's_Ark

Especially when you consider that other Mesopotamian cultures had flood/ark tales predating the Biblical flood, it seems much more likely it was a local version of a common tale.
philhellene is offline  
Old January 26th, 2011, 05:35 AM   #19

Cicero's Avatar
The Adequate
Mostly Harmless
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Tennessee
Posts: 7,829

Continuing the theme.

Click the image to open in full size.



Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
Cicero is offline  
Old January 26th, 2011, 05:41 AM   #20

Cicero's Avatar
The Adequate
Mostly Harmless
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Tennessee
Posts: 7,829

The current record holder, by length ( the tonage record goes to the Batillus class supertankers) 1s the Knock Nevis.
Seawise_Giant Seawise_Giant
Batillus_class_supertankers Batillus_class_supertankers

She has had several names over time.

Mont (2009–10)
Knock Nevis (2004–09)
Jahre Viking (1991–2004)
Happy Giant (1989–91)
Seawise Giant (1979–89)
Cicero is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
maritime history


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ancient Greek economy/modern comparisons philhellene Ancient History 28 February 25th, 2011 12:42 AM
The Phoenician Ship Expedition markdienekes Ancient History 17 July 3rd, 2010 11:42 PM
Nits on the Tudor Rose ship AuraTodd European History 7 October 14th, 2009 04:31 PM
Are we on a “Ship of Fools”? coberst Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 0 June 25th, 2009 10:23 PM
ship burning tactics old_abe General History 9 August 23rd, 2006 06:27 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.