Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 23rd, 2007, 06:18 AM   #21

Dr Realism's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Sep 2006
From: Korea (but I'm American!)
Posts: 1,452
Re: Democracies at war?


Quote:
Originally Posted by dlady View Post
Ah, your right, “democratic peace theory” is the key term. Even Wikipedia has a section on is for God’s sake. I thought I was on to something.. well at least I found this forum.. thanks for the insight..

One note about you signature line: “The strong do what is in their power, the weak suffer what they must- Thucydides”.

You’re referencing Thucydides as though he said this; he was in fact paraphrasing the war mongering Athenians prior to the disaster at Syracuse, many believe as a foreshadowing demonstrating that this was a bad world view..
What's your point?
Dr Realism is offline  
Remove Ads
Old July 23rd, 2007, 06:23 AM   #22
Citizen
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 10
Re: Democracies at war?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Realism View Post
What's your point?
No real point other than trying to start a conversation around your tag line :-)
dlady is offline  
Old July 23rd, 2007, 06:36 AM   #23

Dr Realism's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Sep 2006
From: Korea (but I'm American!)
Posts: 1,452
Re: Democracies at war?


Oh. Well, the sentence also pretty much sums up the Melian debate too. I always enjoyed reading it and laughing at the poor Melians trying to reason with the Athenians.
Dr Realism is offline  
Old July 23rd, 2007, 02:21 PM   #24

Edgewaters's Avatar
Contrarian
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,585
Re: Democracies at war?


I have to agree, Thucydides' history of the Peloponnesian War was actually a stinging criticism of those sorts of attitudes which were held by the Athenians, which he felt caused their defeat and subsequent ignominy. I'm sure he's rolling in his grave at the notion being attributed to him.
Edgewaters is offline  
Old September 1st, 2007, 04:49 PM   #25

Lucius's Avatar
the governed self
 
Joined: Jan 2007
From: Nebraska
Posts: 10,297
Re: Democracies at war?


Here's a fairly systematic take on the subject -

http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/demowar.htm
Lucius is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2007, 07:29 AM   #26

Edgewaters's Avatar
Contrarian
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,585
Re: Democracies at war?


Quote:
Originally Posted by dlady View Post
Ah my good friend, to use the word nonsense is a strong statement, on internet forums everything is magnified, praise and criticism alike; you probably meant to say that it is possible to identify the spirit of a self governed people outside of rigid/strict sociopolitical definitions, and that you feel a constitutional monarchy is ‘close enough’ to self government that we should count it.

For example, you probably meant to counter, other forms of government are tough to delineate as well; while the US calls itself a Democracy, doesn’t it also operative in many ways like a Republic?

Just because I’m new to the forum doesn’t mean it is okay to be rude.
My apologies. In its strictest definition, neither the US nor the UK are democracies. In point of fact, the US has passed resolutions in Congress which affirm that it is explicitly NOT a Democracy, rather a Republic. So we get down to the definition of what is a democracy in a less strict sense? Any definition which is broad enough to include the US is going to include the UK as well.

One specific definition which is in common usage among political theorists is known as a "polyarchy", which has the following qualities:

- Citizens have a right to freedom of expression, including criticism of the government, the economy, etc
- Citizens have the right to create associations, including political associations which can attempt to influence the government
- Decisions are made by elected representatives
- Nearly all citizens have a right to vote in the elections
- Elections are free of fraud or coercion
- Officials are removed peacefully after loss of an election

So, basically, Britain fits the bill equally well - perhaps even slightly better - than the US under this definition.

If you choose a more specific definition which is going to exclude Britain and similar democracies, then it's likely that you can indeed show that democracies do not war with one another - but only because the definition cannot include more than a tiny handful of countries who, strictly by virtue of their extreme rarity (perhaps even singularity!), aren't likely to come into conflict.

Last edited by Edgewaters; September 2nd, 2007 at 07:32 AM.
Edgewaters is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
democracies, war


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.