Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 30th, 2011, 03:05 PM   #1

discover40's Avatar
Academician
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 74
Although Japanese lose WW2,but their economy becomes better than America.


Japanese population 126288419

American population 303824646

The proportion of Japan's GDP in the world is 9.4%.

The proportion of the United States's GDP in the world is 18.3%.

Japanese land area 394000 km2

American land area 7700000 km2

American economy started declining from 1945 relatively.In 1945 the proportion of United States's GDP in the world is 52%-56%,but now it is 18.3%.

American market is being saturated and American infrastructure has already been perfect.Most of Americans have also already had most of daily goods.American infrastructure is oldfashioned and it is older than Asian infrastructure.So no so many jobs for low quality American workers.American technoloies are still being stolen by other countries.If other countries don't pay money for those,American economy are not able to recover.

New buildings are better than old buildings.People will use the most advanced techologies to build these buildings in a new place.That is the reason why Great Britain has fallen.Surrounding countries of the United States have industrialized,so people who live around America don't need American products.Poor countries surrounding India ocean and Middle Asia are new unsaturated markets,but they are too far for American companies and American workers.It is difficult for them to compete with Asian companies.

Japan,India and China are three big building sites.After they finish most of works,their economy will be better than the US and most of new market are very close to India and China.There are bigger requirement in Asia than in America,so a lot of American jobs and companies move to those places.

Africa,Middle Asia,Middle East,Latin America,Candian and Russian no man's lands,all Oceans,Antarctic Continent,Mars and Moon are the next emerging nations.If the countries are very poor and it is close to rich countries,it will become a stronger country in the future.It is the basic rule of market economy.Where has requirement except outsourcing,where will become the most prosperous place.

Companies are more lucky than countries because they can move from one country to another.I call the people who want to move to emerging nations to earn money Jews.They don't have the same bleed,but they have done the same things more than thousands of years.Cartes and other companies can be still alive for a long time after their motherlands have died.At least,I still can see one Dutch company in the United States that was born in two hundred years ago.Now it is named in English name,but it can't change its history.
discover40 is offline  
Remove Ads
Old August 30th, 2011, 03:10 PM   #2

Qymaen's Avatar
King of the Seas!
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Border of GA and AL
Posts: 7,889
Blog Entries: 3

If you look closely enough then you can see that Japan's economy is starting to curve. I think Japan also has massive inflationary problems. I'm no expert, but I'm just saying what I've seen/heard/read. Plus their is the disruption of the earthquake and flooding.

Edit: Look here and here


Quote:
Companies are more lucky than countries because they can move from one country to another.I call the people who want to move to emerging nations to earn money Jews.They don't have the same bleed,but they have done the same things more than thousands of years.
Too far dude. Too far.
Qymaen is offline  
Old August 30th, 2011, 03:12 PM   #3

Naomasa298's Avatar
This title is too lo
 
Joined: Apr 2010
From: T'Republic of Yorkshire
Posts: 16,014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qymaen View Post
If you look closely enough then you can see that Japan's economy is starting to curve. I think Japan also has massive inflationary problems. I'm no expert, but I'm just saying what I've seen/heard/read.
Deflationary, not inflationary.
Naomasa298 is offline  
Old August 30th, 2011, 03:16 PM   #4

Qymaen's Avatar
King of the Seas!
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Border of GA and AL
Posts: 7,889
Blog Entries: 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naomasa298 View Post
Deflationary, not inflationary.
Really? Isn't the one yen equal to like 400 something dollars? How is that not inflation?

Edit: I did get the terms confused.
Qymaen is offline  
Old August 30th, 2011, 03:25 PM   #5

Naomasa298's Avatar
This title is too lo
 
Joined: Apr 2010
From: T'Republic of Yorkshire
Posts: 16,014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qymaen View Post
Really? Isn't the one yen equal to like 400 something dollars? How is that not inflation?

Edit: I did get the terms confused.
The fact that one dollar is worth a lot of yen is just the exchange rate. In itself, it doesn't mean anything. It's the fluctuation of the exchange rate that makes a difference.

Inflation is when a can of Coke today costs 50 yen but costs 100 yen tomorrow. Deflation is when it costs 25 yen tomorrow.
Naomasa298 is offline  
Old August 30th, 2011, 08:41 PM   #6

The Imperial's Avatar
Panther Rider
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: 3rd rock from Sol
Posts: 4,178
Blog Entries: 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qymaen View Post
Really? Isn't the one yen equal to like 400 something dollars? How is that not inflation?

Edit: I did get the terms confused.
lol i think you were trying to say 400 yen equal to 1 dollar . . .
The Imperial is offline  
Old August 30th, 2011, 08:55 PM   #7

zwolf1215's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: May 2009
From: New Jersey
Posts: 521

I thought a reason for this was because America helped Japan get back on it's feet, same with Germany, because of what happened after WW1.
zwolf1215 is offline  
Old August 30th, 2011, 11:20 PM   #8

bolero982's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
From: Rhondda, South Wales
Posts: 315

Quote:
Originally Posted by discover40 View Post
New buildings are better than old buildings.People will use the most advanced techologies to build these buildings in a new place.That is the reason why Great Britain has fallen.
Of course, it had nothing at all to do with the economic strain of fighting off the Nazis on our doorstep and the need to repay a $3.5billion loan linked to the convertability of sterling...which in a large part was necessary due to the US cancelling lend-lease unexpectedly in 1945, and our economy being almost entirely geered towards fighting the war.
bolero982 is offline  
Old August 31st, 2011, 12:25 AM   #9

gaius valerius's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Aug 2009
From: Belgium
Posts: 5,673

Quote:
Originally Posted by discover40 View Post
I call the people who want to move to emerging nations to earn money Jews.
ZOMG...
gaius valerius is offline  
Old August 31st, 2011, 12:37 AM   #10

mongo likes candy's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 209

Also not having to pay for a military is a major factor for the emerging economies of Japan and Germany after the war
mongo likes candy is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
america, economy, japanese, lose, ww2


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Did The U.s. Lose The War In Vietnam? Dr.ARTHURBERNSTEIN, American History 21 January 7th, 2011 02:11 PM
Will America lose its influence like Britain, will China take its place? Darrell88 American History 33 September 7th, 2010 07:27 PM
Question about the economy, history and America Ragz General History 10 July 17th, 2006 05:29 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.