Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 27th, 2011, 10:31 AM   #1

jeroenrottgering's Avatar
Bonapartist
 
Joined: Sep 2010
From: Somewhere in the former First French Empire
Posts: 3,070
Were people more ugly in the past?


Have people grown more handsome then their ancestors in the past. From every portret in history I've seen I haven't really seen someone handsome among them. So what do you think have people's appearances changed since 2000 years ago?
jeroenrottgering is offline  
Remove Ads
Old October 27th, 2011, 10:39 AM   #2

Salah's Avatar
Man in the Box
¤ Blog of the Year ¤
 
Joined: Oct 2009
From: Baltimorean-in-exile
Posts: 16,662
Blog Entries: 120

I've seen plenty of nice looking people in contemporary historical portraits.

Why in the world would modern people be more attractive?
Salah is offline  
Old October 27th, 2011, 10:55 AM   #3

Louise C's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2011
From: Southeast England
Posts: 5,488

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeroenrottgering View Post
Have people grown more handsome then their ancestors in the past. From every portret in history I've seen I haven't really seen someone handsome among them. So what do you think have people's appearances changed since 2000 years ago?
No. I have seen many attractive people in historical portraits.
Louise C is online now  
Old October 27th, 2011, 10:59 AM   #4

DreamWeaver's Avatar
Misanthropologist
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Wales
Posts: 8,465
Blog Entries: 5

Surely what is ugly and what is attractive is entirely subjective to the individual?

Increases in relative levels of healthcare, dental care, nutrition and cosmetics and other benefits of a modern society, no doubt have had an impact on how people look though.
DreamWeaver is online now  
Old October 27th, 2011, 11:11 AM   #5

Richard Stanbery's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2009
From: Tennessee
Posts: 8,298

The old folks probably had a more healthy and robust constitution, better tans, and were generally more comely.

I always thought the country girls were prettier in this way. And the Appalachian girls have that sort of squinty eyed look from being out in the sun a lot. I always thought that was kinda fetching too.

City girls what stays inside in the air conditioning get sort of a pale palor to them. They need to go out and waller around in the dirt wrestling with the critters, spend some time at the fishing hole, and generally get out of the house more and spend some time in the woods and the wild places.

They would get stronger and healthier looking.

Then they would be prettier, I think.
Richard Stanbery is offline  
Old October 27th, 2011, 11:16 AM   #6

Edgewaters's Avatar
Contrarian
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,585

Depends on health conditions really. At some times and in some places they were pretty good (even when life expectancy wasn't that high). In others, not so much.

Also cultural values. The Romans valued physical fitness and the strengthening of the body and form, just as we tend to do. They built gymnasiums in which to practice physical exercises. They were probably a bit more attractive than medieval peasants.
Edgewaters is offline  
Old October 27th, 2011, 11:23 AM   #7
Member Chose To Move On
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,607

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeroenrottgering View Post
Have people grown more handsome then their ancestors in the past. From every portret in history I've seen I haven't really seen someone handsome among them. So what do you think have people's appearances changed since 2000 years ago?
This is an interesting question. I just asked someone who used the expression "stunning in her day" what they meant by that. I never got a satisfactory answer and let the issue drop. However, it seems that physical beauty or pulchritude has a time stamp on it for some.

I do not see it that way. Whether the beauty is in the form of a person, work of art or nature there is a uniqueness about the object of the beauty itself. Time can never determine or diminish that depth of the beauty.
Carlisle Blues is offline  
Old October 27th, 2011, 12:58 PM   #8
Jedi Knight
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Indiana
Posts: 3,341

People had to stay still for several minutes to get an early photograph taken so they come off rather stiff. Also when you look back on your High School photograph after 10, 20 years you realize styles change.
Mike McClure is offline  
Old October 27th, 2011, 01:04 PM   #9

Asgeir's Avatar
Academician
 
Joined: Sep 2011
From: Behind the clouds
Posts: 60

Man, o man...

If one think our ancestors were ugly, where does it put us? We are their descendents, the Heir of their legacy. If they were Ugly, we are ugly.
Asgeir is offline  
Old October 27th, 2011, 01:06 PM   #10
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Ozarkistan
Posts: 11,335

Being unwashed, without dental care, having filthy work -- a number of factors contributed to ugliness in past times more than today. But, then as now, there's no accounting for taste!
corrocamino is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
past, ugly


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Influential people of the past old_abe Ancient History 15 October 16th, 2010 11:44 PM
Did people learn from the past? blacksmit049 Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 9 July 12th, 2010 11:36 AM
Do you think in the past people were shorter? Efendi Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 22 April 9th, 2010 02:48 PM
How did people in the past view the future? Katherine General History 39 January 31st, 2010 11:57 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.