 |
January 4th, 2012, 05:29 AM
|
#1 | | Liberal Crusader
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Plymouth,UK Posts: 2,263 | Most significant 20th century battle.
What do you regard as the most significant battle of the 20th century, in terms of its' military and political impact?
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 05:31 AM
|
#2 | | Historian
Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 4,920 |
definitely WW II..
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 05:46 AM
|
#3 | | OBLIVIOUS
Joined: Dec 2011 From: Ohio Posts: 5,266 |
First battle to pop to mind before I saw the list of choices was Normandy 1944. So I went with Other. But there are a few good choices on the list.
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 05:49 AM
|
#4 | | Historian
Joined: Mar 2011 From: Bedfordshire,England. Posts: 5,553 | Battle of Britain for me,if we had lost this then it would have been the end of us,except for guerilla warfare and it would have changed history for ever.
It also would have left Europe high and dry and made it almost impossible for the US to enter Europe with GB under German control.
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 06:05 AM
|
#5 | | Epicurean
Joined: Mar 2009 From: Texas Posts: 23,898 |
Battle of Sharpsburg, 17 September 1862
*I know it isn't 20th century, but this is a biggie.
I vote other.
| |
Last edited by tjadams; January 4th, 2012 at 06:18 AM.
|
| |
January 4th, 2012, 06:16 AM
|
#6 | | Archivist
Joined: Dec 2011 From: Romania Posts: 188 |
Hard to chose. I cannot decide between the Battle of Marne (which marks the end of the German plan for a quick victory on the Western Front) and Stalingrad (the beginning of the end for Hitler).
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 07:42 AM
|
#7 | | Forum Curmudgeon
Joined: May 2009 From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills Posts: 11,229 |
Stalingrad for a land battle.
Tsushima for a sea battle.
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 07:56 AM
|
#8 | | Liberal Crusader
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Plymouth,UK Posts: 2,263 | Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick Stalingrad for a land battle.
Tsushima for a sea battle. | And Battle of Britain for an air battle?
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 08:36 AM
|
#9 | | Scholar
Joined: Oct 2010 Posts: 951 |
The battle of Marne in September 1914
If the Germans had won, Paris would have been threatened and that would have raised the possibility of a French surrender. This would have avoided the slaughter of the next 4 years, avoided the Treaty of Versailles and WW2.
| | |
| |
January 4th, 2012, 08:45 AM
|
#10 | | Acting Corporal
Joined: May 2011 From: Navan, Ireland Posts: 5,199 | Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick Stalingrad for a land battle.
Tsushima for a sea battle. |
Two good choices but what about Midway as a sea battle, important and Planes destroyed a fleet rather than Battleships? Quote:
Originally Posted by srb7677 And Battle of Britain for an air battle? | Would agree. An invasion was stopped without a ship sailing or a single soldier landing all because a 'positive air environment' (I believe thats the modern term) could not be established.
(I accept that it is far from certain that Sealion was ever or could ever take place but after defeat in the B of B the debate was academic-- bit like Trafalgar) Quote:
Originally Posted by vans The battle of Marne in September 1914
If the Germans had won, Paris would have been threatened and that would have raised the possibility of a French surrender. This would have avoided the slaughter of the next 4 years, avoided the Treaty of Versailles and WW2. | Interesting choice.
but what would Britain have done?
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |