Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


View Poll Results: Which is the most significant 20th century battle?
Tsushima 1905 1 2.33%
The Marne 1914 7 16.28%
Verdun 1916 0 0%
The Somme 1916 0 0%
Amiens 1918 0 0%
Megiddo 1918 0 0%
Vittoria Veneto 1918 0 0%
Warsaw 1920 0 0%
Battle of Britain 1940 6 13.95%
Matapan 1941 0 0%
Moscow 1941-42 2 4.65%
Midway 1942 3 6.98%
El Alamein 1942 0 0%
Stalingrad 1942-43 15 34.88%
Kursk 1943 1 2.33%
Kohima 1944 0 0%
Dien Bien Phu 1954 1 2.33%
Sinai 1973 0 0%
Other 7 16.28%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 4th, 2012, 05:29 AM   #1

srb7677's Avatar
Liberal Crusader
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Plymouth,UK
Posts: 2,263
Most significant 20th century battle.


What do you regard as the most significant battle of the 20th century, in terms of its' military and political impact?
srb7677 is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 4th, 2012, 05:31 AM   #2

kbear's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,920

definitely WW II..
kbear is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 05:46 AM   #3

Rongo's Avatar
OBLIVIOUS
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Ohio
Posts: 5,266

First battle to pop to mind before I saw the list of choices was Normandy 1944. So I went with Other. But there are a few good choices on the list.
Rongo is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 05:49 AM   #4

halomanuk's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: Bedfordshire,England.
Posts: 5,553
Blog Entries: 2

Battle of Britain for me,if we had lost this then it would have been the end of us,except for guerilla warfare and it would have changed history for ever.
It also would have left Europe high and dry and made it almost impossible for the US to enter Europe with GB under German control.
halomanuk is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 06:05 AM   #5

tjadams's Avatar
Epicurean
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Texas
Posts: 23,898
Blog Entries: 35

Battle of Sharpsburg, 17 September 1862

*I know it isn't 20th century, but this is a biggie.


I vote other.

Last edited by tjadams; January 4th, 2012 at 06:18 AM.
tjadams is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 06:16 AM   #6

Spatar's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Romania
Posts: 188
Blog Entries: 4

Hard to chose. I cannot decide between the Battle of Marne (which marks the end of the German plan for a quick victory on the Western Front) and Stalingrad (the beginning of the end for Hitler).
Spatar is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 07:42 AM   #7

diddyriddick's Avatar
Forum Curmudgeon
 
Joined: May 2009
From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills
Posts: 11,229

Stalingrad for a land battle.

Tsushima for a sea battle.
diddyriddick is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 07:56 AM   #8

srb7677's Avatar
Liberal Crusader
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Plymouth,UK
Posts: 2,263

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick View Post
Stalingrad for a land battle.

Tsushima for a sea battle.
And Battle of Britain for an air battle?
srb7677 is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 08:36 AM   #9

vans's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 951

The battle of Marne in September 1914

If the Germans had won, Paris would have been threatened and that would have raised the possibility of a French surrender. This would have avoided the slaughter of the next 4 years, avoided the Treaty of Versailles and WW2.
vans is offline  
Old January 4th, 2012, 08:45 AM   #10

Kevinmeath's Avatar
Acting Corporal
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Navan, Ireland
Posts: 5,199

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick View Post
Stalingrad for a land battle.

Tsushima for a sea battle.

Two good choices but what about Midway as a sea battle, important and Planes destroyed a fleet rather than Battleships?

Quote:
Originally Posted by srb7677 View Post
And Battle of Britain for an air battle?
Would agree. An invasion was stopped without a ship sailing or a single soldier landing all because a 'positive air environment' (I believe thats the modern term) could not be established.

(I accept that it is far from certain that Sealion was ever or could ever take place but after defeat in the B of B the debate was academic-- bit like Trafalgar)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vans View Post
The battle of Marne in September 1914

If the Germans had won, Paris would have been threatened and that would have raised the possibility of a French surrender. This would have avoided the slaughter of the next 4 years, avoided the Treaty of Versailles and WW2.
Interesting choice.

but what would Britain have done?
Kevinmeath is online now  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
20th, battle, century, significant


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 20th century: A century of global brainwashing without precedent? lokariototal General History 29 November 21st, 2011 04:42 AM
What has been the most significant event of the 21st century so far? Traz06 General History 53 February 19th, 2011 09:30 AM
Most significant/important event AND day of the 20th century? lokariototal General History 22 January 7th, 2011 10:50 PM
The most significant century in history Commander General History 3 July 13th, 2007 09:18 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.