 |
January 19th, 2012, 01:22 AM
|
#21 | | Historian ¤ Member of the Year ¤
Joined: Sep 2011 From: UK Posts: 14,612 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Guaporense The world lacks any really important historical event since 2000. 9/11? Well, that was a terrorist attack, it killed some people, scared a lot of people and changed usa policy, but that's it.
Wait until something really important happens. Like WW3! | I agree. | | |
| |
January 19th, 2012, 01:35 AM
|
#22 | | Historian
Joined: Aug 2011 From: Texas Posts: 3,767 |
Geez, couldn't the OP have given us more choices?
| | |
| |
January 19th, 2012, 01:52 AM
|
#23 | | What we have, we hold
Joined: Mar 2011 From: 6th Century Constantinople Posts: 3,334 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohammed the Persian The last decade was just invasion after invasion in the Middle East... | Erm... what? I counted one invasion: Iraq.
| | |
| |
January 19th, 2012, 02:36 AM
|
#24 | | Revisionist
Joined: Nov 2011 From: Closer to Calais than to Birmingham Posts: 3,509 |
It' too early to tell.
| | |
| |
January 19th, 2012, 03:13 AM
|
#25 | | Historian
Joined: Oct 2011 From: Lago Maggiore, Italy Posts: 5,353 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancientgeezer It' too early to tell. | Yes, actually we cannot know ...
in the first 20 years of this era no one was aware that they were living in the Christian age, since the Christ was still to come [but, he was already alive].
Moreover, on last 13rd December 2011 at CERN LHC has seen some sights which could suggest the "passage" of Z bosons [the notorious Higgs bosons, the particles of God].
If in the following years this will be confirmed, 12-13-2011 will become a historical date in science.
Again, consequences in the long term of events above mentioned can change the order of importance.
So, probably we have to wait.
| | |
| |
January 20th, 2012, 05:50 AM
|
#26 | | Citizen
Joined: Oct 2009 From: Sydney, Australia Posts: 25 |
It would be rather unrealistic to posit that in the first decade of the 21st century there has been a more historically significant moment than 9/11. We've lived through the first decade since those planes crashed, and it's not far-stretched to say it had the largest impact on global politics and global economics in the 21st century. As we dawn into the second decade of the century, the Arab Spring and the economic crisis experienced by the West, are the two events that have the greatest potential to influence further historical development in the 21st century.
| | |
| |
January 20th, 2012, 06:14 AM
|
#27 | | Persicus Maximus
Joined: Sep 2010 From: Bahrain Posts: 9,959 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Sankari Erm... what? I counted one invasion: Iraq. | The Israelis pulling out of Lebanon and then going back in 6 years later. Ring any bells ? 
The Libya military intervention . Not an invasion but still interference.
And you can count Afghanistan, if you include it in your definition of the Middle East | | |
| |
January 20th, 2012, 06:47 AM
|
#28 | | Revisionist
Joined: Nov 2011 From: Closer to Calais than to Birmingham Posts: 3,509 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladimir It would be rather unrealistic to posit that in the first decade of the 21st century there has been a more historically significant moment than 9/11. We've lived through the first decade since those planes crashed, and it's not far-stretched to say it had the largest impact on global politics and global economics in the 21st century. As we dawn into the second decade of the century, the Arab Spring and the economic crisis experienced by the West, are the two events that have the greatest potential to influence further historical development in the 21st century. | I'll bet there was a bunch of gentlemen sitting in the Cavalry Club in say, January 1912, discussing whether the Boer War or the Russo-Japanese war were the big events of the century and congratulating themselves that Britain had no entanglements with the continent where trouble was brewing in the Balkans and was safe behind its wall of super-dreadnaughts.
| | |
| |
January 20th, 2012, 07:34 AM
|
#29 | | Citizen
Joined: Mar 2011 From: Cozyland Posts: 22 |
EURO. To be honest, 9/11 was just a media adventure set up by the American government, so I’m not surprised. The adoption of the EURO as a "continental currency" was a reinforcement of the European Union, making it practically borderless (except for cultural and historical differences). It changed the meaning of Trade Blocs and merged international relations between European countries, given the huge economic diffences between them.
| | |
| |
January 20th, 2012, 07:49 AM
|
#30 | | Scholar
Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 532 |
In my opinion the arabic spring..
911 had only simpbolic global effect (and improved the security).
On the other hand the arabic uprisings changed the status quo in Northern Africa, and we still don't know the results of these event.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |