Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 4th, 2012, 07:35 PM   #51

jayhawker's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Feb 2011
From: Kansas
Posts: 147

I cannot get myself into Asian history. I have tried but just not in my interest. I use to not be all that into Ancient history but have had a change of heart through my History of World Art class this semester.
jayhawker is offline  
Remove Ads
Old March 5th, 2012, 04:36 AM   #52
Citizen
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 9

I tend to be bored by factual (superficial) history of dates and events. I think there is no historical period or region that does not get interesting once I start doing specific research and acquire some deeper sense of insight and understanding regarding the subject and its meaning in history.

That said, I do remember one period that just didn't work for me, and that is Dutch history in the 19th and early 20th century. Heh.

Last edited by Myzel; March 5th, 2012 at 05:12 AM.
Myzel is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2012, 02:38 PM   #53
Citizen
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 6

My least favorite time in history would have to be the stone age or the days of walking around in scattered pockets of tribes killing one another. Also the Holy Roman Empire is pretty boring to me.
Goatra of Xdom is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2012, 02:54 PM   #54

spellbanisher's Avatar
Trollbanisher
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: Realityville
Posts: 3,342
Blog Entries: 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guaporense View Post
Least interesting? Well, in the History of Western Eurasia:

1 - Late Roman period, from 200 AD to 400 AD, things got a bit boring: Rome stopped to expand, starts to vegetate while Ancient civilization stops developing and also begins to vegetate and decline. Numerous inconclusive wars with the Sassanians and with the tribes to the North.

2 - Early medieval period: too few sources and also lack of very interesting social processes of change: society is rather vegetative.

3 - The Medieval Period as whole lacks novelty. There were big Eurasian Empires: the Ancients also had that. They had some proto science: The ancients also had that. For instance, while in the middle ages there were the Arab Caliphate and the Byzantines the Ancients got the Achaemenid Persians and the Roman Empire at it's full glory. On the whole medieval warfare was less advanced than earlier warfare: the clearest example is military force projection and Rome could project power more easily than any medieval state.

It was with the Modern Period that things started to get more dynamic and interesting: the unification of all civilizations into a single global civilization, the creation of massive colonial empires and massive processes of social and political change. The power projection capabilites of Rome were surpassed and continued to progress at exponential rates.
There were more mathematical and scientific advances during the Middle Ages than during the ancient era. Either the development of or the the foundations for Nonastronomical trigonometry, hyperbolic geometry, elliptical geometry, the modern numeral system, the graph, the concept of zero, modern arithmetic, algebraic geometry, the calculation of probabilities (i.e. statistics), the ability to mathematically distinguish between speed and acceleration, uniform and nonuniform acceleration, the "intension and remission of forms" (i.e. how things go from hot to cold), the relativity of motion, and on and on. All of these things formed the basis of modern science.

Also, the basis for parlimentarism, our modern system of government, formed during this period, as did double entry bookkeeping, essential for modern banking and finance. Gothic architecture is very sophisticated. The notion that the Middle Ages was "vegetative" and lacked novelty has been outdated for decades.

Personally, I find every era of history fascinating. But then I'm just an omnivorous glutton for knowledge.

Last edited by spellbanisher; March 22nd, 2012 at 03:58 PM.
spellbanisher is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2012, 03:09 PM   #55

bartieboy's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,194
Blog Entries: 4

American civil war...

Click the image to open in full size.
bartieboy is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2012, 03:38 PM   #56

srb7677's Avatar
Liberal Crusader
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: Plymouth,UK
Posts: 2,263

I am least interested in the medieval feudal period. So much of the history of this period seems to revolve around marriages, divorces and family feuds amongst royal and other leading families. It is all a bit too much of a soap opera. I just find it hard to get interested in the Duke of Burgundy marrying the Countess of Blois, or some such. Political movements and social turmoil on the ground interest me: intermarriage amongst the elites do not.
srb7677 is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
favourite, period


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time period in history you want to learn more about? Salah General History 26 January 18th, 2012 01:40 PM
What war period would you want to see in real time? jeroenrottgering War and Military History 30 April 15th, 2011 09:52 AM
Favorite historical period? dlf General History 93 January 4th, 2011 06:16 AM
Most interesting time period in Ancient Roman history Salah Ancient History 31 April 29th, 2010 10:39 AM
Your favorite period of modern world history larkin General History 32 March 7th, 2010 11:16 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.