 | | General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions |
November 11th, 2012, 12:28 PM
|
#1 | | Scholar
Joined: Mar 2012 From: New York City Posts: 541 | Are we living in the 18th Century conspiracy?
What do you make of this? Apparently this is based on the phantom time hypothesis. | | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 12:44 PM
|
#2 | | Historian
Joined: May 2012 From: Denmark Posts: 1,578 |
It's pure nonsense.
| | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 12:45 PM
|
#3 | | Historian
Joined: Oct 2012 From: Between a rock and a hard place Posts: 1,524 |
so everyone and their brother just invented global history over a three hundred year period. NO. ( Has someone on the medievil forum upset you) | | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 12:48 PM
|
#4 | | This title is too lo
Joined: Apr 2010 From: T'Republic of Yorkshire Posts: 15,958 |
While the rest of the world was busy existing in those three centuries, Europe was doing this: | | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 12:49 PM
|
#5 | | Historian
Joined: Jun 2010 From: Retired - This Mountain isn't on a Map Posts: 2,770 | Quote: |
It proposes that periods of history, specifically that of Europe during the Early Middle Ages (AD 614–911), did not exist
|
first of all, i wonder what Islam thinks of this --- ?????
| | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 12:52 PM
|
#6 | | This title is too lo
Joined: Apr 2010 From: T'Republic of Yorkshire Posts: 15,958 | Quote:
Originally Posted by davu | Hey, maybe Ancient Aliens (tm) came and timefroze everyone with their Super Advanced Tech (tm) for 300 years.
| | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 12:59 PM
|
#7 | | Scholar
Joined: Mar 2012 From: New York City Posts: 541 | Quote:
Originally Posted by davu | If you think that's weird. Check out the New Chronology basically it says the antiquity happened during the middle ages. New Chronology (Fomenko) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 01:02 PM
|
#8 | | Historian
Joined: Jun 2012 From: Konstantiniyye Posts: 1,310 |
Are these "theories" have got something to do with all that anti-evolution, young earth nonsense?
| | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 01:10 PM
|
#9 | | Historian
Joined: Oct 2011 From: Lago Maggiore, Italy Posts: 5,324 |
Let's not forget Nostradamus ... Usually he pops out somewhere in similar discussions.
A part this.
It's really difficult to understand how this European [only Western European, since Eastern Roman Empire kept on existing ...] temporal jump happened. And which would be the relative interconnection with the rest of the planet.
In tenth century there was Romanesque architecture. So what? What does this mean? That all Western Roman history was later than we know by a good period of 3- centuries?
Egyptians, from Djoser to Ahmose built pyramids for more than 1,000 years ... and the general architecture of temples, palaces, fortress ... didn't change that much.
| | |
| |
November 11th, 2012, 01:15 PM
|
#10 | | Historian
Joined: Oct 2012 From: Between a rock and a hard place Posts: 1,524 |
Antiquity happened in the middle ages,
So Caesar landed in England and helped Henry Bollingbroke beat Richard 11
I want the film rights to this one.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |