Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > General History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

General History General History Forum - General history questions and discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 30th, 2006, 10:15 AM   #1

Commander's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,348
Mount Everest


Do you think Edmund Hillary, of Great Britain, was really the first man to climb Mount Everest in 1953?
Commander is offline  
Remove Ads
Old July 30th, 2006, 05:31 PM   #2
Lecturer
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 268

Probably not, he was just the first European to climb it. Just like all other 'discoveries' by Europeans, they were never really the first ones to do it.

I'm sure there had been plenty of Sherpas to do it for hundres of years.
kahn is offline  
Old July 31st, 2006, 09:45 AM   #3
Lecturer
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Montana Mountains
Posts: 254

has anyone seen that Mount Everest IMAX movie? It really gives you a true perspective of what it is like on that voyage to the top of the world.
tedkaw is offline  
Old July 31st, 2006, 11:25 AM   #4
Lecturer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
From: Massachusetts
Posts: 314

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahn
Probably not, he was just the first European to climb it. Just like all other 'discoveries' by Europeans, they were never really the first ones to do it.

I'm sure there had been plenty of Sherpas to do it for hundres of years.
There is no evidence to support this. Likely the Sherpas themselves would have stories of doing so, even if unsubstantiated.

There was a possible summit by Mallory and Irvine in 1929. They died on the mountain very near the top, and it is unknown if they died before or after summiting.

BTW, Hillary was from New Zealand, not the UK.

Chris--
DigitusImpudicus is offline  
Old July 31st, 2006, 06:21 PM   #5
Archivist
 
Joined: Jul 2006
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 195

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitusImpudicus
Quote:
Originally Posted by kahn
Probably not, he was just the first European to climb it. Just like all other 'discoveries' by Europeans, they were never really the first ones to do it.

I'm sure there had been plenty of Sherpas to do it for hundres of years.
There is no evidence to support this. Likely the Sherpas themselves would have stories of doing so, even if unsubstantiated.

There was a possible summit by Mallory and Irvine in 1929. They died on the mountain very near the top, and it is unknown if they died before or after summiting.

BTW, Hillary was from New Zealand, not the UK.

Chris--
Thank you for clearing that before I did Chris!
Professor Phantom is offline  
Old August 1st, 2006, 05:07 AM   #6

Commander's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,348

My mistake...
Commander is offline  
Old February 28th, 2009, 06:47 PM   #7

Himanil's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2008
From: India
Posts: 1,957
Re: Mount Everest


Of course not. It's always the 'enlightening Europeans' (no offence) who make the discoveries 'officially'.
It'd been scaled far before 1953.
Himanil is offline  
Old March 1st, 2009, 04:24 AM   #8

Lucius's Avatar
the governed self
 
Joined: Jan 2007
From: Nebraska
Posts: 10,297
Re: Mount Everest


Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal Avenger View Post
Of course not. It's always the 'enlightening Europeans' (no offence) who make the discoveries 'officially'.
It'd been scaled far before 1953.
Discoveries? What discovery? That Everest has a summit? That it's ascent can be survived?

I can't but think that if natives to the region had been possessed of that particular urge, they would have left a marker of some sort at the top to signal to the next fellows that someone else had been there first. They also would have told everybody what they had done.

On the other hand, maybe the people there had been scrambling around on all those mountaintops just for fun and sport for centuries and never thought to mark their "conquests" in any way or tell anybody where they had been because it was no "big deal" to them?

But on the other other hand, Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary were the first.
Lucius is offline  
Old March 1st, 2009, 07:41 AM   #9

Himanil's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2008
From: India
Posts: 1,957
Re: Mount Everest


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucius View Post
Discoveries? What discovery? That Everest has a summit? That it's ascent can be survived?

I can't but think that if natives to the region had been possessed of that particular urge, they would have left a marker of some sort at the top to signal to the next fellows that someone else had been there first. They also would have told everybody what they had done.

On the other hand, maybe the people there had been scrambling around on all those mountaintops just for fun and sport for centuries and never thought to mark their "conquests" in any way or tell anybody where they had been because it was no "big deal" to them?

But on the other other hand, Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary were the first.
The Sherpas didn't possess a urge it was very normal stuff for them to do so, it didn't matter to them how many times they climbed any mountain as long as there was some bumbling person with them whom they guide and get paid for.
Himanil is offline  
Old March 1st, 2009, 08:22 AM   #10

Lucius's Avatar
the governed self
 
Joined: Jan 2007
From: Nebraska
Posts: 10,297
Re: Mount Everest


Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal Avenger View Post
The Sherpas didn't possess a urge it was very normal stuff for them to do so, it didn't matter to them how many times they climbed any mountain as long as there was some bumbling person with them whom they guide and get paid for.
Wait a minute. You seem to be saying that the Sherpas were willing to accept money in return for lying about it. How many Sherpas do you even know?
Lucius is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > General History

Tags
everest, mount


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.