Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > History Book Reviews > Historum Book Discussion
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Historum Book Discussion History Book Discussion Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 12th, 2017, 03:28 PM   #11

robto's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2014
From: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 5,093

US lost because they couldn't maintain (and were not really willing to maintain) a military presence in Indochina forever. Their two decades involvement in the region didn't stop or diminish Communist influence in the region, therefore their mission was a failure - they basically failed to reach their objective.
robto is offline  
Remove Ads
Old September 12th, 2017, 03:58 PM   #12

Tulius's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: May 2016
From: Portugal
Posts: 2,696

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wenge View Post
NO, the United States did not lose the war. To say that the Americans lost the war is pure stupititify.
You mean “stupidity” or “covfefe”?

Typo apart, it doesn’t improve your argument giving negative nomenclatures to the others reasoning. Again, if the USA went to war and didn’t fulfil its objectives, while the enemy did, how can we consider that it did not lose the war?
Tulius is online now  
Old September 12th, 2017, 07:20 PM   #13

sparky's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Jan 2017
From: Sydney
Posts: 880

.
actually , while the US Army lost the war , the grand political objectives of stopping the spread of communism in south East Asia was accomplished .

by 1973 the communist block was broken ,
Indonesia and Malaysia had dealt ( harshly) with their respective internal dissent , Thailand felt safe enough to dip an interventionist toe in Cambodia ,
Laos was walking the tightrope between the blocks , while hating all foreigners .
Vietnam and China had a border war
the supreme poker of Nixon going to shake hand with Mao was the sign of greater thing to come
relation with the USSR were having some pretty good detente and nuclear treaties

sometime winning is incidental to obtaining a good outcome ,
sometimes marking time is the winning strategy
something the US military is too blinkered to understand
as Clemenceau once said "war is too serious a business to let the generals run it "
sparky is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > History Book Reviews > Historum Book Discussion

Tags
happened, vietnam, vietnam war, war



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
★How important wer the Vietnam Anti-War Movement in ending the Vietnam War? NicholasK History Help 8 November 3rd, 2013 10:48 AM
Why did North Vietnam win the Vietnam War? Son of Cathal Asian History 31 April 27th, 2011 10:44 PM
Would the Vietnam War have happened if JFK had lived? WWu777 Speculative History 13 September 6th, 2010 12:41 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.