Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Medieval and Byzantine History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Medieval and Byzantine History Medieval and Byzantine History Forum - Period of History between classical antiquity and modern times, roughly the 5th through 16th Centuries


View Poll Results: How would you rate Baibars as a general?
5 stars 6 85.71%
4 stars 1 14.29%
3 stars 0 0%
2 stars 0 0%
1 star 0 0%
no opinion/not enough evidence to judge 0 0%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 29th, 2010, 06:46 AM   #1

Salah's Avatar
Man in the Box
¤ Blog of the Year ¤
 
Joined: Oct 2009
From: Baltimorean-in-exile
Posts: 16,601
Blog Entries: 118
How would you rate Baibars as a general?


Rukn ad-Din Baibars was the founder of the first Mamluk Dynasty to rule over Egypt, in 1250. He has gained historical fame largely through inflicting a defeat on the Mongols at Ain Jalut - one of the few defeats they ever suffered in the 13th Century.

How would you rate his performance as a leader and tactician?
Salah is offline  
Remove Ads
Old April 29th, 2010, 08:27 AM   #2

Labienus's Avatar
Podestà
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Montréal
Posts: 6,163
Re: How would you rate Baibars as a general?


Five stars. The second best Muslim general in history after khalid. He accomplished impressive things and he managed to save Syria from the Mongols.
Labienus is offline  
Old April 29th, 2010, 08:37 AM   #3
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 19,934
Re: How would you rate Baibars as a general?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Salah ad-Din View Post
Rukn ad-Din Baibars was the founder of the first Mamluk Dynasty to rule over Egypt, in 1250. He has gained historical fame largely through inflicting a defeat on the Mongols at Ain Jalut - one of the few defeats they ever suffered in the 13th Century.

How would you rate his performance as a leader and tactician?
Haven't we already been here before?

In any case, technology aside the Mongol army, society and state(s) of the XII & XIII centuries may well have been the most efficient military machine ever; by any measure, Ain Jalut was an unparalleled deed relative to any other defensive victory I'm aware of.

Far as I can tell, Baibars must be held personally responsible for both this victory and the eventual inability of the Mongols for achieving the expected retribution.
sylla1 is offline  
Old April 29th, 2010, 08:53 AM   #4

alsoubani's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2010
From: Dallas TX
Posts: 1,006
Re: How would you rate Baibars as a general?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Labienus View Post
Five stars. The second best Muslim general in history after khalid. He accomplished impressive things and he managed to save Syria from the Mongols.
i agree with Labienus, to add a little Baibars also had to fight against two great enemies the Mongols and the crusaders, plus deal with the internal conflict of the Islamic empire.

and i also believe that baibers was the first to use explosive hand cannons in war.
for that i'll say five stars
alsoubani is offline  
Old April 29th, 2010, 10:02 AM   #5

Salah's Avatar
Man in the Box
¤ Blog of the Year ¤
 
Joined: Oct 2009
From: Baltimorean-in-exile
Posts: 16,601
Blog Entries: 118
Re: How would you rate Baibars as a general?


Quote:
Originally Posted by sylla1 View Post
Haven't we already been here before?

In any case, technology aside the Mongol army, society and state(s) of the XII & XIII centuries may well have been the most efficient military machine ever; by any measure, Ain Jalut was an unparalleled deed relative to any other defensive victory I'm aware of.

Far as I can tell, Baibars must be held personally responsible for both this victory and the eventual inability of the Mongols for achieving the expected retribution.
Nope, but I have done one of these polls for Salah ad-Din

It would seem that we are all in agree that Baibars was an excellent general.
Salah is offline  
Old April 29th, 2010, 10:03 AM   #6

Salah's Avatar
Man in the Box
¤ Blog of the Year ¤
 
Joined: Oct 2009
From: Baltimorean-in-exile
Posts: 16,601
Blog Entries: 118
Re: How would you rate Baibars as a general?


Quote:
Originally Posted by alsoubani View Post
and i also believe that baibers was the first to use explosive hand cannons in war.
for that i'll say five stars
His infantry used hand cannons at Ain Jalut. Small hand grenades were developed in the Mamluk sultanate during the 13th/14th Centuries, though I don't know if these were used as early as the reign of Baibars.
Salah is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > Medieval and Byzantine History

Tags
baibars, general, rate


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How would you rate Alaric as a general? Salah Ancient History 9 April 1st, 2010 03:52 PM
How would you rate Sulla as a general? Salah Ancient History 14 April 1st, 2010 03:52 AM
How would you rate Salah ad-Din as a general? Salah Medieval and Byzantine History 14 March 31st, 2010 09:20 AM
How would you rate Crassus as a general? Salah Ancient History 32 March 25th, 2010 11:39 AM
How would you rate Robert E. Lee as a General? Salah American History 36 February 28th, 2010 04:17 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.