Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > World History Forum > Medieval and Byzantine History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Medieval and Byzantine History Medieval and Byzantine History Forum - Period of History between classical antiquity and modern times, roughly the 5th through 16th Centuries


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 9th, 2011, 04:12 AM   #1

Mohammed the Persian's Avatar
Persicus Maximus
 
Joined: Sep 2010
From: Bahrain
Posts: 9,972
Blog Entries: 15
Why is it called the "Dark Ages" ?


The period, generally after the fall of the Western Roman Empire until, the 1000s I should say, has often been described as a Dark Age for Europe (It was golden age to us ).

What is (are) the reason(s) behind this term?
Mohammed the Persian is offline  
Remove Ads
Old July 9th, 2011, 04:29 AM   #2

Sankari's Avatar
What we have, we hold
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: 6th Century Constantinople
Posts: 3,336
Blog Entries: 1

It's an outdated misnomer, originally associated with the belief that this was a period of scientific and technological stagnation. Today it is recognised that the "Dark Ages" were not so backward after all.
Sankari is offline  
Old July 9th, 2011, 06:15 AM   #3

clement's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jun 2011
From: California, USA
Posts: 2,103
Blog Entries: 2

Well it was a dark age because of the end of the political unity that was the Roman empire. Otherwise, things are not that clear : the economy of the empire was already weakened long before its end. And actually, for many countries, the dark ages were much better than the ancient period. For example, Germany in 1000 was already much more developped than in, say, 200 AD.

The other trend associated with the darks ages was desurbanization. However, it ought not to be exagerrated. Overall, the Roman empire was highly urbanized, but it was not uniform. Italy indeed became much less urbanized during the dark ages, but for most of Gaul (except the southeast) or Britain, it was not that clear.

For the orient too, it wasn't dark at all. The Byzantine empire had its ups and downs but it was always impressive, rich and magnificent. And more oriental regions became involved in the islamic golden age.
clement is offline  
Old July 9th, 2011, 07:10 AM   #4

DreamWeaver's Avatar
Misanthropologist
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Wales
Posts: 10,178
Blog Entries: 6

As above, the term is hardly accurate and a misnomer. It is no longer used seriously by historians. But it does till survive in popular culture and peception. Such things take time to change, ideas and notions have to filter down from academics to the masses. So the term will probably be used for quite a while in general.

It wasnt a dark age, but it was perhap a bit darker than before and after it. But as pointed out above such terminology is never that simple.
DreamWeaver is online now  
Old July 9th, 2011, 07:11 AM   #5

irishcrusader95's Avatar
None shall pass!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Ireland
Posts: 6,729
Blog Entries: 4

its a term that was coined during the early modern era, 17th or 18th century, to describes the years between them and the roman empire which at the time was looked back with great admiration. they saw the years after it as a fall from grace as the world fell apart only for them to them bring things back as modern nation states began to rise. its not a term that describes the era well and we know now that it wasn't as 'dark' as it was made out to be.
irishcrusader95 is offline  
Old July 9th, 2011, 09:41 AM   #6

Louise C's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2011
From: Southeast England
Posts: 7,241

It is an exaggeration. The times were not so dark. See 'In Search of the Dark Ages' by Michael Wood.
Louise C is offline  
Old July 9th, 2011, 10:36 AM   #7
Historian
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,375

The era was called the "Dark Ages" also because we don't have a lot of written sources from that time period, especially from the early part of the dark ages (500 to 800 CE). Since until recently, most historians only had written sources to rely on, those ages were considered "Dark". In a similar way, Africa was called the "Dark Continent". There was not a lot of knowledge available to Europeans about Africa south of the Sahara, hence the use of the term "Dark Continent".
Bart Dale is offline  
Old July 9th, 2011, 11:08 AM   #8

Fatima's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 437

This is an enormous period in History, about which nothing is known.
5-6 centuries! Compare 2011 and 1511 years.
No nation in the world has such a History as Europe.
Fatima is offline  
Old July 9th, 2011, 11:12 AM   #9

DreamWeaver's Avatar
Misanthropologist
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Wales
Posts: 10,178
Blog Entries: 6

The term is also massively Euro centric, western European in particular
DreamWeaver is online now  
Old July 9th, 2011, 11:28 AM   #10

Kirialax's Avatar
Megas Domestikos
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: Canada
Posts: 3,508
Blog Entries: 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamWeaver View Post
The term is also massively Euro centric, western European in particular
I was never under the impression that it was supposed to refer to anything other than Europe?
Kirialax is offline  
Reply

  Historum > World History Forum > Medieval and Byzantine History

Tags
called, dark ages


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Good" and "Evil" in the Middle Ages oshron Medieval and Byzantine History 20 October 15th, 2013 06:12 AM
Isn't the term "Middle ages" Euro-Centric? lokariototal Medieval and Byzantine History 48 March 25th, 2011 08:37 AM
The "Dark" ages! Dale Crowther History Help 41 April 1st, 2009 11:25 AM
why the "dark ages" cptJACK Medieval and Byzantine History 42 February 23rd, 2007 03:20 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.