Quote:
Originally Posted by Labienus Khalid was a better general in my opinion but that may be only because he did not face a general of his caliber. Heraclius was certainly a man of comparable abilities but his sickness prevented him from facing Khalid in a pitched battle.
Saladin met Richard I, a brilliant general in battle and lost.
Khalid could have lost against Heraclius if he had faced him. So IMO, it is very hard to say. |
Yes, that is my choice too, since you have it I won't explain it.