 | | Middle Eastern and African History Middle Eastern and African History Forum - Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and all nations of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula |
May 9th, 2012, 02:11 PM
|
#1 | | Unchained ¤ Blog of the Year ¤
Joined: Oct 2009 From: Baltimorean-in-exile Posts: 17,022 | The Army of the Prophet
Popular history depicts the first Muslim armies 'erupting' from Arabia like some kind of desert-bound barbarian horde. In reality, the Arabs, though newly-united under the banner of Islam, had already been trading and fighting with the great powers of the Middle East for centuries. As a result, Muhammad commanded an army, not of half-naked tribesmen, but of trained and armored warriors whose equipment was modelled on that of Rome and Persia.
The first Muslim cavalry were often ansar or original followers of the Prophet. Arab cavalry had fought as cataphracts at least as early as the 3rd Century CE; wearing varying degrees of mail and leather armor and sometimes also riding armored horses. Loosely speaking, they would have resembled the savaran of contemporary Persia and would have carried a similar arsenal of thrusting spears, medium-length double-edged swords, and perhaps composite bows (which would have been fired from a static position).
The best-armed infantry were mail-clad spearmen who fought in what contemporary European cultures called a 'shieldwall'. These men wore conical helmets and carried round shields of Sassanid style, but also used thrusting swords that were directly mirrored on the Roman gladius.
The bulk of the Prophet's infantry - indeed, of his army in general -were infantry archers. A medieval proverb relates how Muhammad 'used the Arab bow' to win victory in battle. The typical bow carried by one of the Prophet's followers was a simple flatbow made of 'nab wood, and fired crude arrows with stone heads.
Muhammad, like other Arab war-leaders of his age, paid his warriors in booty and in turn expected them to equip themselves from booty. Initially armor, particularly helmets, and horses were a rare luxury for the elite, but encounters with Roman and Persian forces resulted in more lucrative booty. As early as 630, just two years before the Prophet's death, his army had become known as the 'dark army' because of the unusually high proportions of armored men in its ranks.
Raids - termed razzia - and single combats between champions were traditional aspects of Arab combat that were to outlive the Prophet. Clashes between mubarizun champions took place in the middle ground between two hosts, remniscint of the Biblical story of David and Goliath, and gave the Arab poets much to write and sing about.
As in many tribal societies, women played a strong supporting role in the first Muslim armies, bringing relief to the wounded and on rare occasions even joining in the fighting. At the Battle of Yarmuk in 636 Hind, the fifty year-old mother of the future khalif Mu'awiyah took up a spear and led the expulsion of Romans who had penetrated the Arab camp.
By the 7th Century every Arab tribe had its own banner, many of which were carried by warriors on both sides during and shortly after the lifetime of the Prophet. Muhammad himself had both a small white alam also known as the 'Young Eagle', as well as a much larger black raya banner made from Aisha's head-cloth. A reference coming from the Battle of Badr would suggest that some units in Muhammad's army attempted to coordinate the color of their flag with the color of the turbans worn by the soldiers.
| | |
| |
May 9th, 2012, 02:21 PM
|
#2 | | Historian ¤ Member of the Year ¤
Joined: Sep 2011 From: UK Posts: 14,854 |
Really interesting Salah, another great read, cheers! | | |
| |
May 9th, 2012, 02:25 PM
|
#3 | | Unchained ¤ Blog of the Year ¤
Joined: Oct 2009 From: Baltimorean-in-exile Posts: 17,022 |
Thanks Bri, I did what I could without many of my books handy | | |
| |
May 9th, 2012, 02:27 PM
|
#4 | | Historian ¤ Member of the Year ¤
Joined: Sep 2011 From: UK Posts: 14,854 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Salah Thanks Bri, I did what I could without many of my books handy  | Always fabulous! | | |
| |
May 10th, 2012, 12:29 PM
|
#5 | | Historian
Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 1,540 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Salah The bulk of the Prophet's infantry - indeed, of his army in general -were infantry archers. A medieval proverb relates how Muhammad 'used the Arab bow' to win victory in battle. The typical bow carried by one of the Prophet's followers was a simple flatbow made of 'nab wood, and fired crude arrows with stone heads. | The Nubians next door were famed 'pupil smiters' or 'archers of the eyes.' To Egyptians, since pre-dynastic times, the land of Nubia was known as Ta Seti, the Land of the Bow. The Arabs apparently, at least in the Hijaz and Yemen, learned from Nubian archers, but obviously not enough, since the Muslims suffered their first major defeat against Christian Nubia. These archers were once very critical to Egyptian and Persian infantry. It took not only millenia but the professional Mamluk soldier to stop the Nubian archer.
| | |
| |
May 10th, 2012, 05:58 PM
|
#6 | | ...
Joined: Jun 2009 From: Absurdistan Posts: 24,512 |
Salah, pick up the Cartoon History of the Universe, Vol:III. It has a great take on the 'Rise of Arabia', using Abu Sufyan to great comedic ability over his love of fried food.
| | |
| |
May 11th, 2012, 03:55 AM
|
#7 | | Historian
Joined: Sep 2011 From: Jelgava, Latvia Posts: 1,325 | Quote: |
also used thrusting swords that were directly mirrored on the Roman gladius.
| The gladius had fallen out of use pretty much completely by 200AD. So no, I really doubt the gladius and the Arab short sword had a common origin.
| | |
| |
May 11th, 2012, 04:39 AM
|
#8 | | Unchained ¤ Blog of the Year ¤
Joined: Oct 2009 From: Baltimorean-in-exile Posts: 17,022 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Roach The gladius had fallen out of use pretty much completely by 200AD. So no, I really doubt the gladius and the Arab short sword had a common origin. | Well this is news to me - what then, were Roman legionaries using past 200 CE?
| | |
| |
May 11th, 2012, 04:50 AM
|
#9 | | Historian
Joined: Jan 2012 From: Karachi Posts: 1,015 |
The Spatha .
An arab sword would be like this .
The initial army was mostly foot soldiers, cavalry being extremely rare, the Quraish did have some cavalry led by the famous Khalid Bin Walid which eventually saved the battle for them .
Most of the armour came from the Jewish fortress network of Khyber , along with the many raids and encounters with Rome as Salah mentioned .
By the time of the Rashidun's a professional army had been formed . The armoured dudes looked akin to this , and due to the large amount of weapons captured from Sassanid and Roman armies, there was plenty of armoured infantry running around .
Picture from wiki. | | |
| |
May 11th, 2012, 04:57 AM
|
#10 | | Unchained ¤ Blog of the Year ¤
Joined: Oct 2009 From: Baltimorean-in-exile Posts: 17,022 |
If the spatha was adopted by infantry at all, it was much later than the 3rd Century. A brief glance at tombstones is enough to show that the traditional gladius was still carried by all legionaries into the 4th Century, and the design was easily around long enough to influence the Arabs.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |