Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Natural Environment
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Natural Environment How Human History has been impacted by the environment, science, nature, geography, weather, and natural phenomena


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 16th, 2018, 11:08 PM   #1
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2012
From: Northern part of European lowland
Posts: 2,266
Lattitude and geographical expansion.


What could the relation if any be between the expansion of peoples, empires and lattitude? Some northern peoples, from what I know about as the "eskimo-aleut" groups are spread over vast northern territories, from eastern parts of Siberia over Northern North America to Greenland. An Empire like the Russian expanded to one of the biggest ever. Both in general at high lattitudes, relatively closer to the North Pole than others. This makes less hours of night darkness, more of light for campaigns as well as other voyages and expeditions. Then also the freezing of water in wintertime may have helped groups of voyagers and explorers as well soldiers passing water. Rivers, lakes and even small parts of the Seas. So, could lattitudes have been more important than many of us think about?
Fantasus is online now  
Remove Ads
Old May 17th, 2018, 08:00 AM   #2
Historian
 
Joined: Aug 2016
From: Dispargum
Posts: 2,311

In the Northern Hemisphere people can see the North Star, which aids navigation. The Southern Hemisphere has no navigational equivalent. Navigation leads to exchanges of ideas and knowledge which stimulates creativity and technological progress.



Most of the Earth's land surface is in the Northern Hemisphere. More land - more people - more brains working - more technological progress. Then add that South America and possibly Australia were peopled relatively late and still had small populations when those regions were discovered by Europeans. Again, fewer people means fewer brains at work which means less technological progress.
Chlodio is offline  
Old May 17th, 2018, 08:18 AM   #3

David K's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2014
From: California
Posts: 1,124

The Southern Cross points down to the South. So important a navigation tool, it appears on the flags of many nations in the Southern Hemisphere...

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
David K is offline  
Old May 17th, 2018, 08:49 AM   #4
Historian
 
Joined: Aug 2016
From: Dispargum
Posts: 2,311

Finding north or south isn't the issue. It's finding latitude that matters. Yes, it's possible to find latitude via the Southern Cross, but it's more difficult and less precise than using the North Star.


I don't know if anyone navigated using the Southern Cross without previous knowledge of how to navigate using the North Star. Navigating via the Southern Cross is not as intuitive as via the North Star. There are accounts of Polynesians navigating via the stars but they lived near the equator and could use some northern stars as well as some southern stars. Point being that the farther south one lives, the more difficult celestial navigation becomes.

Last edited by Chlodio; May 17th, 2018 at 08:57 AM.
Chlodio is offline  
Old May 17th, 2018, 09:04 AM   #5

David K's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2014
From: California
Posts: 1,124

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chlodio View Post
Finding north or south isn't the issue. It's finding latitude that matters. Yes, it's possible to find latitude via the Southern Cross, but it's more difficult and less precise than using the North Star.


I don't know if anyone navigated using the Southern Cross without previous knowledge of how to navigate using the North Star. Navigating via the Southern Cross is not as intuitive as via the North Star. There are accounts of Polynesians navigating via the stars but they lived near the equator and could use some northern stars as well as some southern stars. Point being that the farther south one lives, the more difficult celestial navigation becomes.
Indeed! I do remember living in Darwin, Australia (in 1970) and my dad spotting the Big Dipper one night (low on the horizon)! The Big Dipper locates the North Star (Polaris) easily... which is on the end of the handle of the Little Dipper.
David K is offline  
Old May 17th, 2018, 09:11 AM   #6

Frank81's Avatar
Guanarteme
 
Joined: Feb 2010
From: Canary Islands-Spain
Posts: 4,670

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantasus View Post
What could the relation if any be between the expansion of peoples, empires and lattitude? Some northern peoples, from what I know about as the "eskimo-aleut" groups are spread over vast northern territories, from eastern parts of Siberia over Northern North America to Greenland. An Empire like the Russian expanded to one of the biggest ever. Both in general at high lattitudes, relatively closer to the North Pole than others. This makes less hours of night darkness, more of light for campaigns as well as other voyages and expeditions. Then also the freezing of water in wintertime may have helped groups of voyagers and explorers as well soldiers passing water. Rivers, lakes and even small parts of the Seas. So, could lattitudes have been more important than many of us think about?
Latitude help in a way so same climate area (similar conditions for production and transport) expand through large swaps of territory. This help to understand the large (and elongated) empires of Eurasia.

In the case of Russia, this northern state can be partly explained by the latitude: born at a southern latitude, where more intensive production was possible, and then expanded to northern areas where equivalent competitive civilization was not possible. To a lesser degree, this is true as well for Canada: its centre was the Great Lakes area, then expanding north. However, in this case a naval expansion by northern shore took place (Hudson's company).

The introduction of the naval factor altered the traditional dominance of horizontal-latitudinal expansion. Both, the Spanish and the British empires, could develop vertical, non latitudinal empires.
Frank81 is offline  
Old May 17th, 2018, 11:18 AM   #7
Historian
 
Joined: Jan 2012
From: Northern part of European lowland
Posts: 2,266

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank81 View Post
Latitude help in a way so same climate area (similar conditions for production and transport) expand through large swaps of territory. This help to understand the large (and elongated) empires of Eurasia.

In the case of Russia, this northern state can be partly explained by the latitude: born at a southern latitude, where more intensive production was possible, and then expanded to northern areas where equivalent competitive civilization was not possible. To a lesser degree, this is true as well for Canada: its centre was the Great Lakes area, then expanding north. However, in this case a naval expansion by northern shore took place (Hudson's company).

The introduction of the naval factor altered the traditional dominance of horizontal-latitudinal expansion. Both, the Spanish and the British empires, could develop vertical, non latitudinal empires.
I donīt think Imperial Russia originated at a southern latitude. Moscow of the later empire of the Tsars is located like Scotland, Denmark. While there was earlier Russian principalities more to the South there were others North of Moscow, like Novgorod. Though So many ninvaders ultimately failed, we should also notice they often started a very fast advance deeply into the land. Probably partly because of lack of natural hindrances when weather conditions are good. Then it may also have helped the many hours in summertime where there is daylight to see. Armies, as well as smaller groups of travellers would probably like to travel the light hours, and rest in the dark night.
Fantasus is online now  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Natural Environment

Tags
expansion, geographical, lattitude



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geographical determinism and history Bullit Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 38 December 12th, 2016 10:18 AM
How much of the United States success is due to its geographical location? Peterc American History 20 June 1st, 2016 12:56 PM
Who Had More Geographical Knowledge at 1 BC? EmperorTigerstar Ancient History 2 August 23rd, 2015 06:48 PM
Why were Indians so poor in geographical knowledge compared to other civilizations? civfanatic Asian History 170 September 8th, 2014 10:12 AM
Geographical Divisions of Asia Jhangora Asian History 2 June 29th, 2010 07:44 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.