 | | Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Forum - Perennial Ideas and Debates that cross societal/time boundaries |
February 27th, 2011, 06:04 AM
|
#41 | | Kayıkçı Efe
Joined: Jul 2009 From: Anatolia Posts: 10,590 | Quote:
Originally Posted by sturm I have often seen that turks are left with the impression that before the Ottomans conqured the Balkans, there was nothing here. Like this land fallen down from the sky and thats pretty much it.
The land has history long before the Ottoman empire. | I haven't said there were nothing before Ottomans.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 06:06 AM
|
#42 | | Kayıkçı Efe
Joined: Jul 2009 From: Anatolia Posts: 10,590 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Qymaen Yet in the map I provided on post #34 the Ottomans clearly spread out from east of the Bosporus. | Yes they spread then?
In this mentality British are not European. Because they had more land away from Britania.
It is obvious where the center of the empire is.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 06:08 AM
|
#43 | | Tiger of Kai
Joined: Apr 2010 From: Tampa, FL Posts: 5,151 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Efendi Yes they spread then?
In this mentality British are not European. Because they had more land away from Britania.
It is obvious where the center of the empire is. | Both the British Empire and the Ottoman Empire were more than European empires. I think it's unfair to the both of them to classify them as such.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 07:27 AM
|
#44 | | King of the Seas!
Joined: Nov 2010 From: Border of GA and AL Posts: 7,889 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Efendi Yes they spread then?
In this mentality British are not European. Because they had more land away from Britania.
It is obvious where the center of the empire is. | But then wouldn't the empire be more Middle Eastern than European?
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 07:35 AM
|
#45 | | Kayıkçı Efe
Joined: Jul 2009 From: Anatolia Posts: 10,590 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Qymaen But then wouldn't the empire be more Middle Eastern than European? | It depend on where the center of the empire is.
When you apply your aproach, it arise that Britain, Spanish are not European empire.
Center of the empire is undoubtedly clear. Center of the empire was not the mideast.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 07:37 AM
|
#46 | | Kayıkçı Efe
Joined: Jul 2009 From: Anatolia Posts: 10,590 | Quote:
Originally Posted by leakbrewergator Both the British Empire and the Ottoman Empire were more than European empires. I think it's unfair to the both of them to classify them as such. | Actually majority of the empires spread more than one continent, British, Spanish, Roma, Byzantine.
I think Empires should be categorized with their centers.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 09:52 AM
|
#47 | | Historian
Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,432 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Qymaen But then wouldn't the empire be more Middle Eastern than European? | It is neither.It is a Eurasian one.A mixture of the east and the west.It has been called the Islamic Roman Empire or the heir of the Eastern Roman Empire.And I would agree.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 02:41 PM
|
#48 | | Historian
Joined: Apr 2010 From: In the Western Hemisphere Posts: 3,552 |
Yes, it was an Asian, African, and European Empire. The people subjugated to their rule included Tartars, Greeks, Albanians, Bulgarians, Serbians, Slavs, Hungarians, Croatians, etc. Constantinople is located on the edge of Europe, and once it was captured and renamed Istanbul it remained in Europe. It did not magically transport to Asia or the Middle East or Africa because *gasp* Turks took over the city from the Byzantines.
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 02:54 PM
|
#49 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 19,934 |
At least from the conquest of Kallipolis by the Ottomans in 1354 to this very date, Turkey has been indeed a relevant actor in the political, economic and military balance of Europe.
BTW, any European colonial power, from Courland to Genoa, has been an "imperial power" out of Europe; the Medieval Roman Empire, the Golden Horde & Russia actually even in a contiguous way (to some extent also some states in Sicily and the Iberian Peninsula, either Christian or Muslim).
| | |
| |
February 27th, 2011, 11:44 PM
|
#50 | | миротворец
Joined: Jul 2009 From: Bulgaria Posts: 8,694 | Quote:
Originally Posted by sylla1 At least from the conquest of Kallipolis by the Ottomans in 1354 to this very date, Turkey has been indeed a relevant actor in the political, economic and military balance of Europe.
BTW, any European colonial power, from Courland to Genoa, has been an "imperial power" out of Europe; the Medieval Roman Empire, the Golden Horde & Russia actually even in a contiguous way (to some extent also some states in Sicily and the Iberian Peninsula, either Christian or Muslim). | Yes but the question here isn't exactly geography, but culturally.
As i said for example Russia from before Peter I "the Great" reforms was in my opinion not European. The army, the nobility the cities are a clear example of it. However his reforms westernized it, the same way reforms in the Ottoman empire at the end of 18th and the first half of 19th century westernized the Ottoman empire, and from that day, from the day of the reforms in the Ottoman empire, i believe there is no reason (except geographical arguments) to consider the empire non-european, because it was European, the arts, the fashion in the empire, the way the army was restructiored, the freedom's that were given to the citizens after 1856 and so on.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |