 | | Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Forum - Perennial Ideas and Debates that cross societal/time boundaries |
November 21st, 2011, 01:37 PM
|
#11 | | Suspended indefinitely
Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 2,578 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlisle Blues "But Wingate said records show McLemore has at least four felony drug convictions and one misdemeanor conviction dating to 1996.She made false statements in 2006, 2007, 2009 and 2010, according to an indictment."
She has a bridge to sell you as well......In fact so do I......    | | | |
| |
November 21st, 2011, 04:04 PM
|
#12 | | Epicurean
Joined: Mar 2009 From: Texas Posts: 23,951 |
Sure are a lot of bridges being sold on here lately. | | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 08:32 AM
|
#13 | | Quack
Joined: Jan 2009 From: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 3,249 |
I tend to see her more as an addict than as a "repeat offender." Quote: |
Wingate bypassed sentencing McLemore under federal guidelines that suggested she receive two to eight months in prison and would have made her eligible for probation.
| But the federal guidelines include additional time for previous crimes. Our justice system is not about justice or preventing crime. It is about punishing the small fish--about society's terrible vengeance. It's a sad commentary on our criminal justice system.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 08:41 AM
|
#14 | | Spiritual Ronin
Joined: Aug 2009 From: Minnesnowta Posts: 19,015 | Quote: |
Our justice system is not about justice or preventing crime. It is about punishing the small fish--about society's terrible vengeance. It's a sad commentary on our criminal justice system.
| Agreed. It should be perhaps called "maintaining status quo" system as opposed to justice system.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 08:57 AM
|
#15 | | The Snub Nosed Truth
Joined: Dec 2010 From: Oregon coastal mountains Posts: 5,415 |
I'd say the fact that in all of those previous convictions she only served 10 days in jail, is good evidence that the Justice System went to considerable lengths to prevent future crimes. They cut her a lot of slack, and I would imagine she also was mandated to treatment, from my experience in such cases.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 09:13 AM
|
#16 | | Member Chose To Move On
Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 6,607 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Patito de Hule I tend to see her more as an addict than as a "repeat offender."
But the federal guidelines include additional time for previous crimes. Our justice system is not about justice or preventing crime. It is about punishing the small fish--about society's terrible vengeance. It's a sad commentary on our criminal justice system. | What would you have done?
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 09:45 AM
|
#17 | | Quack
Joined: Jan 2009 From: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 3,249 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlisle Blues What would you have done? | I would have stuck with the plea agreement and the guidelines.
There is good reason for doing so. If people (and their lawyers) get the notion that this judge bypasses plea agreements, then they should hold out for a trial. This will totally swamp the court.
In the second place, reading between the lines here, all of her previous felony convictions are for non-violent drug offences. Most of these should not even be felonies.
In the third place, the guidelines themselves are overkill. The result has been long sentences for relatively minor crimes. Our prisons are filled beyond capacity. Around 60% of our prison inmates are there for non-violent drug offences.
In the fourth place, there is no federal facility for female inmates in Mississippi. She will probably be assigned to Carswell in Fort Worth, TX. That facility is one of the better for women, and has an attached hospital for treatment of inmates, but it is still far removed from her community and family. These are the worst conditions for breeding recidivism. In all studies, the best indicator of who will be successfully returned to their community is the amount of contact they have with their community while doing their time.
After all this, I have to admit that I am not privy to the presentencing report of the parole officer, but neither was the reporter who wrote the story.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 02:59 PM
|
#18 | | Member Chose To Move On
Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 6,607 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Patito de Hule I would have stuck with the plea agreement and the guidelines.
There is good reason for doing so. If people (and their lawyers) get the notion that this judge bypasses plea agreements, then they should hold out for a trial. This will totally swamp the court.
In the second place, reading between the lines here, all of her previous felony convictions are for non-violent drug offences. Most of these should not even be felonies.
In the third place, the guidelines themselves are overkill. The result has been long sentences for relatively minor crimes. Our prisons are filled beyond capacity. Around 60% of our prison inmates are there for non-violent drug offences.
In the fourth place, there is no federal facility for female inmates in Mississippi. She will probably be assigned to Carswell in Fort Worth, TX. That facility is one of the better for women, and has an attached hospital for treatment of inmates, but it is still far removed from her community and family. These are the worst conditions for breeding recidivism. In all studies, the best indicator of who will be successfully returned to their community is the amount of contact they have with their community while doing their time.
After all this, I have to admit that I am not privy to the presentencing report of the parole officer, but neither was the reporter who wrote the story. | This woman is incorrigible, "while committing this offense, she was still on supervised released," Wingate said. "While on bond, she tested positive for drugs." I beleive he is doing her a favor, maybe even saving her life. While incarcerated she may get rehabilitative assistance regarding her obvious problems. It is clear that leniency has not deterred her from committing these acts.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 04:16 PM
|
#19 | | Quack
Joined: Jan 2009 From: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 3,249 |
Incorrigible? She's an addict. Federal prison and the joke of an addiction program they have there will not resolve that.
To see what a joke this criminal "justice" can be, I remember a case in 1966/67. A man stole a pig. When the deputy sheriff went to serve a warrant, the suspect's brother shot and killed the deputy. The pig thief was sentenced to twenty years for grand theft; his brother got three for 2nd degree murder.
That's the type of miscarriage of justice the article was about. Neither you nor I know enough from the article about the woman to make a judgment.
| | |
| |
November 23rd, 2011, 04:28 PM
|
#20 | | Member Chose To Move On
Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 6,607 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Patito de Hule Incorrigible? She's an addict. Federal prison and the joke of an addiction program they have there will not resolve that.
To see what a joke this criminal "justice" can be, I remember a case in 1966/67. A man stole a pig. When the deputy sheriff went to serve a warrant, the suspect's brother shot and killed the deputy. The pig thief was sentenced to twenty years for grand theft; his brother got three for 2nd degree murder.
That's the type of miscarriage of justice the article was about. Neither you nor I know enough from the article about the woman to make a judgment. |
You did make a judgment, "she's an addict and "what a joke this criminal "justice" can be".
I also made a judgment based on my experiences with the administration of the justice system, addiction and success stories while applying such to the facts that were offered by the article. | | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |