Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Forum - Perennial Ideas and Debates that cross societal/time boundaries


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 2nd, 2012, 03:24 PM   #41

antonina's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 4,017

Quote:
Originally Posted by arras View Post
Russia does not pose as champion of freedom and does not sent soldiers, bomb, burn and kill to impose freedom on other people.US does.

Some time ago your admonished me for ignoring the casualties of the war in Iraq. Like I said, I'm not happy about our soldiers presence there, so I decided to take your tip and explore.
Here are the results:

IRAQ

An independent UK/US group, the IBC project shows a minimum of 99,004 and a maximum of 108,076 as of December 2, 2010.

Iraq_Body_Count_project Iraq_Body_Count_project
103,536 — 113,125 civilian deaths as a result of the conflict.

WHO stated about 150,000 in 2008.

Hard to say who to believe, so I'll top up the figure. Let's say: Total: 120,000


CHECHNYA


A.Cherkasov from the Memorial estimated the number of civilians killed in the 1st war at 50,000, and 25,000 in the 2nd war., together 75,000.


The
Society_for_Threatened_Peoples Society_for_Threatened_Peoples
estimated the civilians casualties of the first war at 80,000 and the second war at 50,000. Together 130,000

Accurate figures have been very hard to come by, especially during the second war, during which access for journalists and independent researchers was tightly restricted.
So let's say:
Total: 100,000

__________________________________________________ _______________


I'm no wizard with figures, but have tried to be accurate (correct me if I made some major mistake)


It looks like the numbers are comparable. About one hundred civilian casualties in both nations. Horryfying figures.


Now let's place this against the respective population of each country.


IRAQ


Civilian casualties:
120,000

Population: 30,399,572
(2011 census) About 30 million.


CHECHNYA


Civilian casualties:
100,000

Population
: 1,269,095 (2010 census) About 1 million.
__________________________________________________ ________

Looking at these figures, a question inevitably comes to mind, what sort of war has been waged in Chechnya by the Russian Federation to warrant such colossal losses.

You can find the answer if you wish, even though few Russian journalists have dared ask the question and few foreign ones have bothered to do so.

I needn't search for the answer - I know it.

Last edited by antonina; June 2nd, 2012 at 03:33 PM.
antonina is offline  
Remove Ads
Old June 2nd, 2012, 11:40 PM   #42

General Winter's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: May 2012
From: In the Land of Russia where the Shadows lie
Posts: 358
Blog Entries: 3

I wonder,what does Russia have to do here? Perhaps Russian affairs are not better,so what?Does it make you feel better?The argument a la "Fool youself!" shows the absence of serious arguments.We are talking about the USA as a model capitalist state.

You again pretend not to notice new given facts :

Incarceration_in_the_United_States Incarceration_in_the_United_States

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/wo...3738.html?_r=1


So US prison population in total in 2007 was 2,418,352. Compare with "terrible Gulag" ; ГУЛаг — Википедия :

in the midst of the great purge in 1937 - 1,196,369; in 1938 - 1,881,570. Before the great purge in 1934 - 510,307 !

It;s only facts without any comments.Having a little of brain everyone can evaluate them.
General Winter is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2012, 05:25 AM   #43

Patton's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ohio
Posts: 891

Quote:
Originally Posted by General Winter View Post
I wonder,what does Russia have to do here? Perhaps Russian affairs are not better,so what?Does it make you feel better?The argument a la "Fool youself!" shows the absence of serious arguments.We are talking about the USA as a model capitalist state.
Of course! We've a saying over here, "Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones." In other words, avoid criticizing when you have the same faults. I'm not even sure the culmination of what you are trying to say as you've provided absolutely no context (Though I've my suspicions). Any fool can copy and paste text from a website, it takes a semi-intelligent fool to provide some meaningful context or commentary to those numbers. You've provided basically nothing. What little you have provided seems to border on a Khrushchev era level of propaganda.



Quote:
Originally Posted by General Winter View Post
You again pretend not to notice new given facts :

Incarceration in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/wo...3738.html?_r=1


So US prison population in total in 2007 was 2,418,352. Compare with "terrible Gulag" ; ГУЛаг — Википедия :

in the midst of the great purge in 1937 - 1,196,369; in 1938 - 1,881,570. Before the great purge in 1934 - 510,307 !

It;s only facts without any comments.Having a little of brain everyone can evaluate them.
Why are you omitting those kulaks executed or starved to death from your total? Is it because you can't imprison someone who is dead? How about you research those number and add them to your total.
Patton is online now  
Old June 3rd, 2012, 05:36 AM   #44

PubliusBassus's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: May 2012
From: Franklin, TN
Posts: 560

Quote:
Originally Posted by General Winter View Post
Let's read again: "By age 23, up to 41 percent of American adolescents and young adults have been arrested at least once for something other than a minor traffic violation ". ,ie reasons for the arrest were significant.

The truth is that nobody puts more people into prison than America does. The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarce..._United_States ) ) and the largest total prison population on the entire globe ( http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/wo....12253738.html ).
First of all, again, arrest is not the same as conviction. Most people who are arrested (and then released) are not even subsequently charged with a crime, much less convicted.

Regarding incarceration, most prisoners in the US are there for drug-related offenses. Some states have a "3 strike rule," meaning the third drug conviction automatically leads to a lengthy prison term, regardless of the nature of the offense. I will agree that the penal system needs reform, but to argue that the US is somehow less free because it has a relatively high number of people who have been justly convicted of criminal acts is a weak argument indeed.
PubliusBassus is offline  
Old June 4th, 2012, 04:27 AM   #45

General Winter's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: May 2012
From: In the Land of Russia where the Shadows lie
Posts: 358
Blog Entries: 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patton View Post
Why are you omitting those kulaks executed or starved to death from your total? Is it because you can't imprison someone who is dead? How about you research those number and add them to your total.
Because I'm ommiting victims of your great depression : Where did America
General Winter is offline  
Old June 4th, 2012, 04:57 AM   #46

Linschoten's Avatar
nonpareil
 
Joined: Aug 2010
From: Wessex
Posts: 7,860
Blog Entries: 11

What a stupid thread!
Linschoten is offline  
Old June 4th, 2012, 06:45 PM   #47

General Winter's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: May 2012
From: In the Land of Russia where the Shadows lie
Posts: 358
Blog Entries: 3

11-year-old Pennsylvanian is youngest person in world to face life without parole. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/2...ithout-parole/

Jordan Brown is the youngest person known to Amnesty International to be currently at risk of being sentenced to life imprisonment with no parole. However, there are already at least 2,500 people in the US serving life imprisonment without parole for crimes committed when they were under 18.

Amnesty notes that the US is one of only two countries in the world who have refused to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Somalia is the other country.

No comment.
General Winter is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology

Tags
free


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free Will Th Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 43 January 29th, 2011 11:14 AM
20th century free states, free cities and plebiscites larkin European History 0 October 24th, 2009 09:38 AM
FREE WILL/ OR NOT? Afrasiyab Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 36 June 23rd, 2008 06:29 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.