Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology Forum - Perennial Ideas and Debates that cross societal/time boundaries


View Poll Results: Is military intervention sometimes justified?
No, never. Basically. 2 20.00%
Yes, it is. The consequences of not intervening are generally greater. 8 80.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 13th, 2012, 03:22 PM   #11
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 19,934

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chancellor View Post
The question speaks well for itself. I'm primarilly thinking of humanitarian grounds.

Choose the best option. It's never easy.
The question is easy, it simply couldn't be any more subjective and morally relativistic.

At the risk of overstating the obvious, it entirely depends on the context and especially on the side of the beholder (i.e. invader or invaded)

Ergo, if the question speaks for itself, then the options of the poll simply couldn't be any more irrelevant; i.e. both context and side are entirely ignored.

And of course, the non-fallacious application of Goodwin's Law is simply unavoidable here...
For all the posters who answered "yes" in this nice poll above, guess they were specifically thinking about any of the myriad nice military interventions of Herr Hitler & co.
Especially against their own homeland, one may guess.

For all the posters who answered "no", it's extremele hard to find any example of any bona fide patriots who may have ever stated the opposite on their own homeland.
Maybe Mr. Benedict Arnold... ???


Next poll; who wants his house being burglered tonight?

Last edited by sylla1; November 13th, 2012 at 03:28 PM.
sylla1 is offline  
Remove Ads
Old November 13th, 2012, 03:39 PM   #12

Stephy's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: May 2011
From: Germany
Posts: 573
Blog Entries: 20

This isn't a question that can be answered generally you have to look at each case individually. It's always a hard decision to make no doubt.
Stephy is offline  
Old November 13th, 2012, 04:25 PM   #13

Belgarion's Avatar
Cynical Optimist
 
Joined: Jul 2011
From: Australia
Posts: 2,930

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick View Post
Since you only included polar opposites, then I abstain from voting. I would propose a third option-Sometimes the lesser of two evils.
This.

Also, I can recall at least two fairly recent occasions when people begged for foreign military intervention. The East Timorese asked for Australian military intervention to neutralise the Indonesian backed militias after the independence referendum of 1999, and anti Ghaddafi Libyans asked for NATO assistance during the revolution of 2011. Should these requests have been ignored?
Belgarion is offline  
Old November 13th, 2012, 07:47 PM   #14

pnoozi's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Jul 2011
From: New York
Posts: 2,102

This poll is completely ridiculous. The answer is complicated yet you want a binary response.
pnoozi is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology

Tags
intervention, military, wrong


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who was Steiner? Good military general or not? HistoryFreak1912 War and Military History 13 December 27th, 2013 09:57 AM
Was the US military really that good? Mike Lynch War and Military History 410 April 9th, 2013 04:13 PM
How good of a military tactician was Charles XII of Sweden? Ashiusx War and Military History 3 October 25th, 2012 09:19 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.