Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Speculative History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 11th, 2017, 09:10 PM   #11

Seabas's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
From: appartments
Posts: 422

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenestella View Post
RISK is winning on every front from the Pontic to the Pacific
So mainly they win on their own territories. ooo scaring...
Seabas is offline  
Remove Ads
Old January 12th, 2017, 03:17 AM   #12
Lecturer
 
Joined: Aug 2013
From: Pomerium
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabas View Post
So mainly they win on their own territories. .
Anti-American propaganda keeps saying that the USA is the global hegemon with "full spectrum dominance" while the RISK controls the landmass from the Pontic to the Pacific and keeps marching
Fenestella is online now  
Old January 12th, 2017, 06:20 AM   #13

YouLoveMeYouKnowIt's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2013
From: Canada
Posts: 3,652

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenestella View Post
Anti-American propaganda keeps saying that the USA is the global hegemon with "full spectrum dominance" while the RISK controls the landmass from the Pontic to the Pacific and keeps marching
The reason why I am saying you're parroting propaganda is NOT because you're claiming China, Russia, and Iran are high on resurgence and challenging the existing world order.

The problem is you using the term RISK to assert a non-existent relationship between the said countries, and the perpetrators of that fabricated news are cable news propaganda. Do you have any proof for the existence of an RISK-alliance? Is there evidence for this alliance?
YouLoveMeYouKnowIt is online now  
Old January 12th, 2017, 07:28 PM   #14

Seabas's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
From: appartments
Posts: 422

Quote:
Originally Posted by YouLoveMeYouKnowIt View Post
The reason why I am saying you're parroting propaganda is NOT because you're claiming China, Russia, and Iran are high on resurgence and challenging the existing world order.

The problem is you using the term RISK to assert a non-existent relationship between the said countries, and the perpetrators of that fabricated news are cable news propaganda. Do you have any proof for the existence of an RISK-alliance? Is there evidence for this alliance?
I am affraid the only reason he wrote that nonsense is boredom.
Seabas is offline  
Old January 12th, 2017, 07:52 PM   #15
Lecturer
 
Joined: Aug 2013
From: Pomerium
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by YouLoveMeYouKnowIt View Post
China, Russia, and Iran are high on resurgence and challenging the existing world order
That's the substance, the elephant in the room Anti-American propaganda wants us to ignore.
RISK is just a jeu de mots. You can call them Anti-American Quartet, Eurasian Tetrarchy, Four Bogeymen of the Apocalypse, or whatever.
Fenestella is online now  
Old January 12th, 2017, 08:45 PM   #16

YouLoveMeYouKnowIt's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Oct 2013
From: Canada
Posts: 3,652

I cannot continue the conversation under this context as I don't recognize this bundling of business partners as an alliance, or in other words as boogeymen or destroyers of the world.

Your description of a boogeyman fits some other nation better. There's one country that has repeatedly aided rebel groups who are Islamofascists and terrorists, and have oversaw and directly aided in the transition of stable but immoral secular regimes into failed and supremely immoral democrazies with rampant corruption, factionalism, endless internal strife and war, and situations much worse than the before the boogeyman got involved - and "RISK" isn't that boogeyman.
YouLoveMeYouKnowIt is online now  
Old January 12th, 2017, 10:19 PM   #17
Lecturer
 
Joined: Aug 2013
From: Pomerium
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by YouLoveMeYouKnowIt View Post
I cannot continue the conversation under this context as I don't recognize this bundling of business partners as an alliance, or in other words as boogeymen or destroyers of the world.

Your description of a boogeyman fits some other nation better. There's one country that .
Then why keep downplaying instead of celebrating the reality that these Three Amigos are pushing back this Bogeyman on every front from the Pontic to the Pacific?

I'm not interested in whether they're justified to push back, I'm only interested in how much further they'll push back.
Fenestella is online now  
Old January 13th, 2017, 01:29 AM   #18

tontonmakuta's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
From: RU
Posts: 453

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenestella View Post
these Three Amigos are pushing back this Bogeyman on every front from the Pontic to the Pacific?
.
What happened to the fourth amigo!!!?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One of the joys of travel is visiting new towns and meeting new people" - Genghis Khan
tontonmakuta is online now  
Old January 13th, 2017, 02:31 AM   #19
Lecturer
 
Joined: Aug 2013
From: Pomerium
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by tontonmakuta View Post
What happened to the fourth amigo!!!?
YouLove only acknowledges the "partnership" between China, Iran, and Russia. Let's suppose that's the case, and see what he has to say about the tripartite "partnership" vs the USA
Fenestella is online now  
Old January 13th, 2017, 03:32 AM   #20

Son of Athena's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Dec 2012
From: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,483

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenestella View Post
As the EU and NATO are becoming more and more decadent and divided, the Russo-Irano-Sino-(North)Korean Axis is ascendant and coordinated. The USA's military superiority is vanishing, given the RISK's insane armament. Will the RISK keep winning on every front from the Pontic to the Pacific? What countries will be at great risk?
Yeah, a military equipped with tractors like these keep us awake at night

Click the image to open in full size.
Son of Athena is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Speculative History

Tags
risk



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Could the Axis Powers have won in the Mediterranean and North Africa? Firefly War and Military History 54 January 11th, 2015 05:59 PM
Complete Axis Victory in North Africa Lawnmowerman Speculative History 11 July 15th, 2013 08:16 PM
The Great Franco-Russo Rivalry in Jerusalem Mohammed the Persian Middle Eastern and African History 6 March 25th, 2012 02:00 PM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.