Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Speculative History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 7th, 2011, 03:05 PM   #11

diddyriddick's Avatar
Forum Curmudgeon
 
Joined: May 2009
From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills
Posts: 11,223

Quote:
Originally Posted by mingming View Post
Japan's navy was far superior than that of Germany's. In fact the German Admiral told Hitler that Germany's navy won't be ready for war until 1945. In terms of submarines I think they are evenly matched.



Tanks weren't really useful to the Japanese, especially in the Pacific Theater. Most of Japan's tanks were light tanks; small and maneuverable and they were used (to great effect) in China. Germany fought primarily on land so they need tanks more than the Japanese.

Excellent points. If I might amplify a bit.....

The Kriegsmarine was frankly second rate, while Japan's navy was amongst the very best afloat. If one compares the submarine fleets, Germany has a slight edge, but used what she had much more effectively. With the exception of the Bismark Class, the Kriegsmarine had NOTHING on the surface which could compete with the IJN. And after June of 42, even the Bismarks were outclassed by the Yamatos. Significantly, Japan produced 16 aircraft carriers that saw service during the war, while Germany only had one still-born effort (Graf Zeppelin). Moreover, the IJN had superior carrier aircraft, training, and doctrine. It would have been at LEAST 1960 before Germany could mount a credible counterpart to Japan's navy.

So....If we're talking a naval war, Japan wins, and wins decisively-moreso if Tokyo actually uses their submarine fleet against merchant shipping rather than combat vessels. Ground war would undoubtedly be a German affair.
diddyriddick is offline  
Remove Ads
Old April 7th, 2011, 03:37 PM   #12

Belloc's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: USA
Posts: 4,302

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick View Post
So....If we're talking a naval war, Japan wins, and wins decisively-moreso if Tokyo actually uses their submarine fleet against merchant shipping rather than combat vessels. Ground war would undoubtedly be a German affair.
I don't know about merchant shipping. Judging by their poor performance against US submarines, I'd say the Germans have the edge here.
Belloc is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 03:52 PM   #13

diddyriddick's Avatar
Forum Curmudgeon
 
Joined: May 2009
From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills
Posts: 11,223

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belloc View Post
I don't know about merchant shipping. Judging by their poor performance against US submarines, I'd say the Germans have the edge here.
I acknowleged Germany's edge in submarines. But navies are not not ONLY about submarines. In 1940, naval aviation was just coming into its own. While Germany DID have an edge in submarines, particularly in doctrine, it was not enough to overcome their abysmal surface fleet. Bismark made one sortie before being sunk. Tirpitz spent most of the war bottled up in Norwegian fjords. And Graf Zeppelin was cancelled before she was launched.

Significantly, Germany's UBoat fleet was pretty much done after the middle of 43, largely because of the same US Navy you cited. They had some kills, but for the first time, the attrition rate was greater than they could replace the boats.
diddyriddick is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 03:57 PM   #14

Belloc's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Mar 2010
From: USA
Posts: 4,302

Interesting point, but the Japanese navy was pretty much done after Midway or at the latest Leyte Gulf. I'll have to get back to you on this.
Belloc is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 04:00 PM   #15

mingming's Avatar
Young, Wild, and Free
 
Joined: Feb 2011
From: Da Bay
Posts: 4,282

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belloc View Post
Interesting point, but the Japanese navy was pretty much done after Midway or at the latest Leyte Gulf. I'll have to get back to you on this.
True but the Kriegsmarine was done before that.
mingming is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 04:24 PM   #16

diddyriddick's Avatar
Forum Curmudgeon
 
Joined: May 2009
From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills
Posts: 11,223

The Japanese fleet was done after Midway?

Of the 16 Japanese carriers that saw service during WWII, only 4 were sunk at Midway with one older light carrier sunk at Coral Sea. And only a handful of IJN gunnery type ships were sunk by June of 42. Indeed, as Rehabnono has rightly pointed out the second half of 42 was a precarious time for the US Navy in the Pacific being outnumbered in active carriers by a 4-1 margin. It wasn't until the Essex Class hulls started entering service in early 43 that the US Navy really started gaining the upper hand.
diddyriddick is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 09:09 PM   #17

bartieboy's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,167
Blog Entries: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by mingming View Post
True but the Kriegsmarine was done before that.
No, the German submarines harassed the allies till the very end.
bartieboy is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 09:18 PM   #18

mingming's Avatar
Young, Wild, and Free
 
Joined: Feb 2011
From: Da Bay
Posts: 4,282

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartieboy View Post
No, the German submarines harassed the allies till the very end.
So did Japanese submarines. The Japanese were building submarines like crazy towards the end of the war, even subs that could fit planes inside. And by done, I mean their navy practically ceased to be a major fighting force. The Japanese navy held out longer.
mingming is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 09:45 PM   #19

bartieboy's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Dec 2010
From: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,167
Blog Entries: 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by mingming View Post
So did Japanese submarines. The Japanese were building submarines like crazy towards the end of the war, even subs that could fit planes inside. And by done, I mean their navy practically ceased to be a major fighting force. The Japanese navy held out longer.
however i do believe Germany in the end would have a greater naval capacity. Because of its richer natural resources (iron mines etc.)
bartieboy is offline  
Old April 7th, 2011, 10:01 PM   #20
Historian
 
Joined: Apr 2010
From: In the Western Hemisphere
Posts: 3,552

Quote:
Originally Posted by bartieboy View Post
however i do believe Germany in the end would have a greater naval capacity. Because of its richer natural resources (iron mines etc.)
Capacity means nothing for quality.
scholar is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Speculative History

Tags
empire, germany, japaneese, nazi


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Could the Soviets defeat Nazi Germany alone? napoleonteh1st European History 432 October 27th, 2012 03:40 PM
Nazi Germany would have won WII if... Commander Speculative History 167 May 12th, 2011 02:32 AM
Good resource on Nazi Germany diddyriddick European History 1 March 24th, 2010 02:32 PM
More archaeology of Nazi Germany diddyriddick War and Military History 2 March 23rd, 2010 05:59 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.