 | | Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research |
April 7th, 2011, 03:05 PM
|
#11 | | Forum Curmudgeon
Joined: May 2009 From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills Posts: 11,223 | Quote:
Originally Posted by mingming Japan's navy was far superior than that of Germany's. In fact the German Admiral told Hitler that Germany's navy won't be ready for war until 1945. In terms of submarines I think they are evenly matched.
Tanks weren't really useful to the Japanese, especially in the Pacific Theater. Most of Japan's tanks were light tanks; small and maneuverable and they were used (to great effect) in China. Germany fought primarily on land so they need tanks more than the Japanese. |
Excellent points. If I might amplify a bit.....
The Kriegsmarine was frankly second rate, while Japan's navy was amongst the very best afloat. If one compares the submarine fleets, Germany has a slight edge, but used what she had much more effectively. With the exception of the Bismark Class, the Kriegsmarine had NOTHING on the surface which could compete with the IJN. And after June of 42, even the Bismarks were outclassed by the Yamatos. Significantly, Japan produced 16 aircraft carriers that saw service during the war, while Germany only had one still-born effort (Graf Zeppelin). Moreover, the IJN had superior carrier aircraft, training, and doctrine. It would have been at LEAST 1960 before Germany could mount a credible counterpart to Japan's navy.
So....If we're talking a naval war, Japan wins, and wins decisively-moreso if Tokyo actually uses their submarine fleet against merchant shipping rather than combat vessels. Ground war would undoubtedly be a German affair.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 03:37 PM
|
#12 | | Historian
Joined: Mar 2010 From: USA Posts: 4,302 | Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyriddick So....If we're talking a naval war, Japan wins, and wins decisively-moreso if Tokyo actually uses their submarine fleet against merchant shipping rather than combat vessels. Ground war would undoubtedly be a German affair. | I don't know about merchant shipping. Judging by their poor performance against US submarines, I'd say the Germans have the edge here.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 03:52 PM
|
#13 | | Forum Curmudgeon
Joined: May 2009 From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills Posts: 11,223 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Belloc I don't know about merchant shipping. Judging by their poor performance against US submarines, I'd say the Germans have the edge here. | I acknowleged Germany's edge in submarines. But navies are not not ONLY about submarines. In 1940, naval aviation was just coming into its own. While Germany DID have an edge in submarines, particularly in doctrine, it was not enough to overcome their abysmal surface fleet. Bismark made one sortie before being sunk. Tirpitz spent most of the war bottled up in Norwegian fjords. And Graf Zeppelin was cancelled before she was launched.
Significantly, Germany's UBoat fleet was pretty much done after the middle of 43, largely because of the same US Navy you cited. They had some kills, but for the first time, the attrition rate was greater than they could replace the boats.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 03:57 PM
|
#14 | | Historian
Joined: Mar 2010 From: USA Posts: 4,302 |
Interesting point, but the Japanese navy was pretty much done after Midway or at the latest Leyte Gulf. I'll have to get back to you on this.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 04:00 PM
|
#15 | | Young, Wild, and Free
Joined: Feb 2011 From: Da Bay Posts: 4,282 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Belloc Interesting point, but the Japanese navy was pretty much done after Midway or at the latest Leyte Gulf. I'll have to get back to you on this. | True but the Kriegsmarine was done before that.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 04:24 PM
|
#16 | | Forum Curmudgeon
Joined: May 2009 From: A tiny hamlet in the Carolina Sandhills Posts: 11,223 |
The Japanese fleet was done after Midway?
Of the 16 Japanese carriers that saw service during WWII, only 4 were sunk at Midway with one older light carrier sunk at Coral Sea. And only a handful of IJN gunnery type ships were sunk by June of 42. Indeed, as Rehabnono has rightly pointed out the second half of 42 was a precarious time for the US Navy in the Pacific being outnumbered in active carriers by a 4-1 margin. It wasn't until the Essex Class hulls started entering service in early 43 that the US Navy really started gaining the upper hand.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 09:09 PM
|
#17 | | .
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The Netherlands Posts: 5,167 | Quote:
Originally Posted by mingming True but the Kriegsmarine was done before that. | No, the German submarines harassed the allies till the very end.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 09:18 PM
|
#18 | | Young, Wild, and Free
Joined: Feb 2011 From: Da Bay Posts: 4,282 | Quote:
Originally Posted by bartieboy No, the German submarines harassed the allies till the very end. | So did Japanese submarines. The Japanese were building submarines like crazy towards the end of the war, even subs that could fit planes inside. And by done, I mean their navy practically ceased to be a major fighting force. The Japanese navy held out longer.
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 09:45 PM
|
#19 | | .
Joined: Dec 2010 From: The Netherlands Posts: 5,167 | Quote:
Originally Posted by mingming So did Japanese submarines. The Japanese were building submarines like crazy towards the end of the war, even subs that could fit planes inside. And by done, I mean their navy practically ceased to be a major fighting force. The Japanese navy held out longer. | however i do believe Germany in the end would have a greater naval capacity. Because of its richer natural resources (iron mines etc.)
| | |
| |
April 7th, 2011, 10:01 PM
|
#20 | | Historian
Joined: Apr 2010 From: In the Western Hemisphere Posts: 3,552 | Quote:
Originally Posted by bartieboy however i do believe Germany in the end would have a greater naval capacity. Because of its richer natural resources (iron mines etc.) | Capacity means nothing for quality.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.
|  |