Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Speculative History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 20th, 2012, 10:25 AM   #1

ghostexorcist's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: Midwest
Posts: 602
Blog Entries: 34
Discovery of primate tool use in the 1860s


Primate tool use was first recorded in the 1960s. This simple fact drastically changed how science viewed our chimp cousins. What do you think the reaction would have been in the 1860s, shortly after Darwin published his On the Origin of Species?
ghostexorcist is offline  
Remove Ads
Old May 20th, 2012, 02:24 PM   #2
Jedi Knight
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Indiana
Posts: 3,339

Nothing! The scientific community would have ignored it.
Mike McClure is offline  
Old May 20th, 2012, 03:49 PM   #3

ghostexorcist's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: Midwest
Posts: 602
Blog Entries: 34

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike McClure View Post
Nothing! The scientific community would have ignored it.
I have a feeling that it would have been rejected by a large majority due to religious leanings, or they would have just said the chimps learned it from humans. However, for the purposes of this thread imagine the information is irrefutable, meaning that it could somehow be demonstrated that they did not learn it (which is the reality).
ghostexorcist is offline  
Old May 21st, 2012, 08:32 AM   #4
Jedi Knight
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Indiana
Posts: 3,339

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghostexorcist View Post
I have a feeling that it would have been rejected by a large majority due to religious leanings, or they would have just said the chimps learned it from humans. However, for the purposes of this thread imagine the information is irrefutable, meaning that it could somehow be demonstrated that they did not learn it (which is the reality).
In 1860 science wasn't even sure that Blacks and Whites were the same species. Doctors were just learning to wash their hands between operations. Chimps using tools, impossible
Mike McClure is offline  
Old May 21st, 2012, 09:09 AM   #5

ghostexorcist's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
From: Midwest
Posts: 602
Blog Entries: 34

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike McClure View Post
In 1860 science wasn't even sure that Blacks and Whites were the same species. Doctors were just learning to wash their hands between operations. Chimps using tools, impossible
That's a good point.
ghostexorcist is offline  
Old May 21st, 2012, 01:05 PM   #6
Historian
¤ Member of the Year ¤
 
Joined: Sep 2011
From: UK
Posts: 14,612
Blog Entries: 7

Good points.

I think many would simply put the blinkers on and find excuses to ignore the implications.

However, there would always be some who would be fascinated by such a thing, I believe. After all, Darwin was not the only one to have such views, he was not alone in his thinking.
Brisieis is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2012, 01:12 PM   #7

Zarin's Avatar
Historian
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,459

Darwin created a firestorm with his publishing of the Origin of Species. It instantly created a danger to established Christian dogma and assumptions. Similar to what Copernicus and Galileo created with their discoveries. If proof had been available of chimpanzee tool use then, this may have eroded some of the hostility which occurred among members within Darwin's own scientific community and given more credence to cetain aspects of Darwin's discoveries. Especially vis a vis the so-called "monkey" connection. It would have been extremely difficult to argue against this tool use commonality between man and the common ancestor, man is believed to have with chimpanzees. However, even with such obvious connections in capabilities between humans and chimpanzees, there are people even today; who still refuse to see what is so obvious around them. Evolution is a fact not a theory.
Zarin is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2012, 01:20 PM   #8
Jedi Knight
 
Joined: Nov 2010
From: Indiana
Posts: 3,339

Another interesting question would be, what would have happened if Darwin had read Gregor Mendel's paper on genetics?
Mike McClure is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2012, 01:25 PM   #9

Bish's Avatar
Pain in the butt
 
Joined: Dec 2011
From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk.
Posts: 3,607

I'm sure the church would have altered its teachings to fit in with the new findings.
Bish is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2012, 01:28 PM   #10

Rasta's Avatar
Spiritual Ronin
 
Joined: Aug 2009
From: Minnesnowta
Posts: 18,998

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bish View Post
I'm sure the church would have altered its teachings to fit in with the new findings.
. . . . . . . in Europe.
Rasta is online now  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Speculative History

Tags
1860s, discovery, primate, tool


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
War as a political tool Fantasus War and Military History 11 May 2nd, 2012 07:01 AM
1860s Ripe for a World War? WeisSaul Speculative History 10 April 1st, 2012 05:46 AM
Christianization and Reformation - a political tool only? philosopher Medieval and Byzantine History 19 September 26th, 2011 09:52 PM
Japanese Tool Specters ghostexorcist Asian History 9 April 21st, 2011 10:56 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.