Sweden attacks Denmark instead of invading Germany? - Historum

Delenda est Roma · June 28th, 2012, 09:23 AM

My question is the title. I think Sweden wouldve been able to crush Denmark in its weakened state. I think Sweden wouldve seized Norway and Scania. With its hands free from Germany it wouldve either vassalized the Danes or conquered more of Poland or Russia. What do you think wouldve happened?

**Pacific_Victory** · June 28th, 2012, 09:24 AM

What year are we talking about?

starkodder · June 28th, 2012, 09:29 AM

This is not speculation, it's a fact.

Delenda est Roma · June 28th, 2012, 09:32 AM

I stated in the title invades Denmark instead of Germany. The time is 1629 right before Swedish intervention in the 30 years war.

**Pacific_Victory** · June 28th, 2012, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delenda est Roma

I stated in the title invades Denmark instead of Germany. The time is 1629 right before Swedish intervention in the 30 years war.

Oh right, I kind of skimmed over the title and for some reason I saw "Sweden Invades Germany" and I thought you were talking speculative WWII

Delenda est Roma · June 28th, 2012, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pacific_Victory

Oh right, I kind of skimmed over the title and for some reason I saw "Sweden Invades Germany" and I thought you were talking speculative WWII

Lol! Slight misread!

Delenda est Roma · June 28th, 2012, 10:28 AM

Anyway with Swedens immediate homeland more secure by the taking of Scania and Norway would Sweden have become a land or maritime power? Would she have invaded and took control of much of Russia?