Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Speculative History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 30th, 2012, 05:02 AM   #1
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: May 2012
From: London
Posts: 162
Turkic- mixed Asians ruled White for 500 years. Are they military superior to Europe?


Doesn't this mean they were historically far more military superior to Europeans? I've been to the empires forums before and the members there always talk about how Europeans empires had ruled the world and that no other groups achieved this but the Turkic people have conquered just much territories in it's history like Europeans and even ruled Europe them many times before. Sure that Arabs and Mongols expanded their territory in large scale but that was all an one time glory. Turkic and Europeans had many different empires and conquered the world in different times.

The only difference is that European empires conquered more than 3/4 of the world's territories while Turkic empires conquered more than 1/2 of the world territories however Turkic people or mixed Asians people also ruled Europe for nearly 500 years and under many different empires. Europeans only got to ruled Central Asia under Russia. Could Europe have conquered like the Turkic empires if it weren't for Chinese invention gunpowder.

YOU ALL KNOW ABOUT THE EUROPEANS EMPIRES. LET SHOW YOU THE TURKIC EMPIRES THAT NOT ONLY CONQUERED EUROPE MANY TIMES BUT OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD.


Xiongnu Xiongnu
Xiongnu
Click the image to open in full size.

"Well-preserved bodies in Xiongnu and pre-Xiongnu tombs in the Mongolian Republic and southern Siberia show both 'Mongoloid' and 'Caucasian' features[49] but are predominantly Mongoloid with some admixture of European physical stock, nonetheless the Xiongnu shared many cultural traits with their Indo-European neighbors, such as horse racing, sword worship.[50] Analysis of skeletal remains from sites attributed to the Xiongnu provides an identification of dolichocephalic Mongoloid, "

Click the image to open in full size.


GOKTURKS
Gokturks Gokturks
Click the image to open in full size.

Gokturk from Altai
Click the image to open in full size.

An Gokturk V-VIII AD, Kyrgyzstan
Click the image to open in full size.

Gokturk from Mongolia
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.


Avars
Eurasian_Avars Eurasian_Avars
Click the image to open in full size.

Avar chief :- B Papkert Cemetery
(Rippl-Ronai Museum, Kaposvar)
Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
Avar Man: Csepel
(MTM, Budapest)
Click the image to open in full size.

Anthropology

Anthropological research has revealed few skeletons with Mongoloid-type features, although there was continuing cultural influence from the Eurasian nomadic steppe. The late Avar Period shows more hybridization resulting in higher frequencies of Europo-Mongolids.[19] Mongoloid and Euro-Mongoloid types compose about one-third of the total population of the Avar graves of the eighth century, but as more Europoid populations were conquered by the Avars, the percentage of Europoids amongst the Avars became much higher. According to Pál Lipták the early Avar anthropological material was almost exclusively Europoid in the 7th century, while grave-goods indicated Middle and Central Asian parallels.[20] On the other hand there were cemeteries dated for the 8th century that contained Mongoloid elements among others. He analysed the Avar Period population of the Danube-Tisza midland region and stated that 80% of them was of Europoid character.[20]


OGHUZ TURKS

Seljuk Empire
Great_Seljuq_Empire Great_Seljuq_Empire

Click the image to open in full size.

Oghuz from Western + Southern Kazakhstan.

Among the Oghuz (mainly in the steppe zone of their resettlement) dominated Mongoloid racial type. "They - wrote about the Aral Oghuz in the tenth century. Al-Masudi, - most of undersized (Turks) and they have very small eyes" [11]. Other medieval authors note poorly defined vegetation on the face and body and Ploskonos Oguz. All of this suggests Mongoloid features that were characteristic of the bulk predominantly steppe Oguz [12].

Click the image to open in full size.

These written sources of X-XII centuries. the physical appearance of the Oghuz confirm some paleoanthropological materials. Among the found in the Oguz-Pecheneg mounds of western Kazakhstan skulls dominate Mongoloid types with the South Siberian features. However, there are also found the skull Caucasoid and metisnogo appearance. [13]

More intensive process of ethnic assimilation is likely to take place among the Oghuz south-western regions of Central Asia. Quite a few, but very interesting in this respect craniological material is located in southern Kazakhstan. In excavated ANBernshtam Oguz cemeteries Sasyk-Bulak buried dolihokrannye Caucasoids mixed with Mongoloid features. [14]

Click the image to open in full size.


Hunnic Empire
Hunnic_Empire Hunnic_Empire
Click the image to open in full size.


Anthropology
The descriptions of Attila leads me to think he was Mongoloid aswell as the Huns, but the graves revealed that only some of them were Mongoloid-Europoid mixed while most were Caucasians but this makes me think the leader and the ruling class of the Huns were mongoloid who subjugated an Caucasian Hun.

Attila

"Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his origin."

Huns

Jordanes, a Goth writing in Italy in 551, a century after the collapse of the Hunnic Empire, describes the Huns as a "savage race, which dwelt at first in the swamps, a stunted, foul and puny tribe, scarcely human, and having no language save one which bore but slight resemblance to human speech."

"They made their foes flee in horror because their swarthy aspect was fearful, and they had, if I may call it so, a sort of shapeless lump, not a head, with pin-holes rather than eyes.

Last edited by KingButler; October 30th, 2012 at 05:46 AM.
KingButler is offline  
Remove Ads
Old October 30th, 2012, 05:08 AM   #2

Lucius Vorenus's Avatar
Boss(ma)niac.
 
Joined: Sep 2012
From: Dalmatia Interior
Posts: 2,696
Blog Entries: 1

You obviously visited wrong forums.
Lucius Vorenus is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 05:22 AM   #3
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: May 2012
From: London
Posts: 162

The most terrifying half mongoloid/Turkic empires was by the Uzbeks of Central Asia who are genetically and racially 40-45% Mongoloid + 55-60% Caucasoid.

Timur is regarded as a military genius and a tactician whose prowess made him one of the world’s great conquerors. Timur's armies were ferocious, feared throughout Asia, Africa, and Europe[15]. Independent scholars estimate that his military campaigns caused the deaths of 17 million people, amounting to about 5% of the world population.

The most powerful Turkic empire in history were the Timurids

Timurlane rule
Click the image to open in full size.
Timurid empire 1370–1526
Click the image to open in full size.

1. Timur: Mongoloid with some caucasoid amixture
2. Ulugh Beg: Mongoloid with some caucasoid admixture
3. Shah Rukh: Caucasoid with some mongoloid admixture

All three of them are closely related, Timur is the grandfather, Ulugh Beg is the grandson, and Shah Rukh the father.

Timur

Click the image to open in full size.

Anthropology data: From his bones it was clear that Timur was a tall and broad chested man with strong cheek bones. Gerasimov reconstructed the likeness of Timur from his skull. At 5 feet 8 inches (1.73 meters), Timur was very tall for his era. Gerasimov also confirmed Timur's lameness due to a hip injury. Gerasimov also found that Timur's facial characteristics conformed to general Mongoloid features.[52] In the study of "Anthropological composition of the population of Central Asia" shows the cranium of Timur predominate the characters of the South Siberian Mongoloid type.[64] Timur is classified as being closer to the Mongoloid race with some admixture.

Ulugh Beg

Click the image to open in full size.

Anthropology data: Soviet anthropologist Mikhail M. Gerasimov reconstructed the face of Ulugh Beg. Like Timurlane, Ulugh Beg is close to the Mongoloid type with slightly Europoid features.


Achievements: His real name was Mīrzā Mohammad Tāraghay bin Shāhrokh. Ulugh Beg was also notable for his work in astronomy-related mathematics, such as trigonometry and spherical geometry. He built the great Ulugh Beg Observatory in Samarkand between 1424 and 1429. It was considered by scholars to have been one of the finest observatories in the Islamic world at the time and the largest in Central Asia.[2] He also build the Ulugh Beg Madrasah (1417–1420) in Samarkand and Bukhara, transforming the cities into cultural center of learning in Central Asia.[3] He was also a mathematics genius of the 15th century — albeit his mental aptitude was perseverance rather than any unusual endowment of intellect.[4] He ruled Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and southern Kazakhstan for almost half a century from 1411 to 1449 and occupied the Herat province in Afghanistan for a short time in 1448.

Shah Rukh

Click the image to open in full size.

Anthropology data:Soviet anthropologist Mikhail Mikhaylovich Gerasimov reconstructed the heads of Timur, his son Shah Rukh and grandson Ulug Beg, with Timurlane being closer to the Mongoloid type, while Shah Rukh, the son of a Tajik woman, had Europoid features. Shah-Rukh indeed was a typical representative of the brachycephalic Europoid, the so-called Ferghana- Pamir type.[9][10] However, because Timurlane was closer to the mongoloid type, this would make Shah Rukh in reality an genetic hybrid of the Euro-Mongoloid race despite the fact he has little to no mongoloid features.

Achievements: was the Timurid ruler of the eastern portion of the empire established by the Central Asian warlord Timur (Tamerlane) - the founder of the Timurid dynasty - governing most of Persia and Transoxiana between 1405 and 1447. Shāhrukh was the fourth and youngest son of Timur and child of one of his Tajik concubines.

Mughal Empire

The Mughal empires was also descended from the hybrid Mongol Timurids

Click the image to open in full size.



I read from someone that Northern Uzbek and Eastern uzbeks have people look more mongoloid like Kazakh and Kyrgyz. While Central and south Uzbekistan have more people that look like Turkmen. Uzbeks are almost close to 50/50 mongoloid. Some look more Caucasoid while some look more Mongoloid.

Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.


Here are what Uzbeks from the south look like.
Click the image to open in full size.

Now look at the Uzbeks where Timur was born, many of them look like this.
Click the image to open in full size.
Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by KingButler; October 30th, 2012 at 05:45 AM.
KingButler is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 05:55 AM   #4
Suspended indefinitely
 
Joined: May 2012
From: London
Posts: 162

Another Turkic empire that ruled Europe very long time.

Click the image to open in full size.

The bust looks just like a Semi-Mongoloid person.

Click the image to open in full size.
KingButler is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 11:43 AM   #5

okamido's Avatar
knows what the bee knows
 
Joined: Jun 2009
From: land of Califia
Posts: 27,892
Blog Entries: 20

Days, meet Numbered.
okamido is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 11:51 AM   #6

Rasta's Avatar
Spiritual Ronin
 
Joined: Aug 2009
From: Minnesnowta
Posts: 21,071

I never knew the Huns were an Empire, nor that India was located in Europe. I learn something new every day.
Rasta is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 03:21 PM   #7

Efendi's Avatar
Kayıkçı Efe
 
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Anatolia
Posts: 11,347

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rasta View Post
I never knew the Huns were an Empire, nor that India was located in Europe. I learn something new every day.
History is full of wonder indeed.
Efendi is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 03:59 PM   #8

Temujin's Avatar
Archivist
 
Joined: Aug 2012
From: Martian Protectorate of Earth
Posts: 213

The Turkic and Iranic tribes that invaded Europe did have an advantage over their European enemies because of their fighting style, with which the Europeans were not used to. However, this has nothing to do with race. The Europeans had simply not encountered the horse archery of the Central Asian tribes before. Neither does race determine the Turkic and Iranic tribes' periods of dominance in Eastern Europe. Yes, they were mostly Mongoloid and mixed, but the only reason they as a type of civilization prevailed was because of the shared culture and hence, fighting style, between the different Turkic tribes. Race is a man-made concept and does not explain anything. It simply shows that some idiots cannot comprehend that people who look different to them can possibly be equal or superior to them.
Temujin is offline  
Old October 30th, 2012, 10:25 PM   #9

harbinger's Avatar
Scholar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 719

The thread itself is racist and title should be altered.The turkish central asian steppe tribes had great advantages during the era which led to military success.Availability of good horses and trained horsemen in the golden age of cavalry.Archery tradition and great quality bows.Tribal federations able to field greater standing armies etc due to the iqta and khalisa systems in respect to their adversaries mostly feudal systems.
harbinger is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 06:32 AM   #10

Naomasa298's Avatar
Bog of the Year
 
Joined: Apr 2010
From: T'Republic of Yorkshire
Posts: 21,603

Do modern biologists and anthropologists even use the term "mongoloid" to describe people any more, or did that die out with the racist and racial theories of the 1930s?
Naomasa298 is offline  
Reply

  Historum > Themes in History > Speculative History

Tags
500, asians, europe, military, mixed, ruled, superior, turkic, white


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Europe's borders in 30-40 years? WeisSaul Speculative History 14 June 27th, 2012 07:36 PM
Europe was ruled by Black People until 1789 BlackEurope600 European History 29 November 20th, 2011 03:34 PM
What if Africa would still be ruled by the powers of Europe? jeroenrottgering Speculative History 31 November 6th, 2011 11:40 AM
Asians in Western Europe Rich European History 12 September 29th, 2011 11:13 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.