Historum - History Forums  

Go Back   Historum - History Forums > Themes in History > Speculative History
Register Forums Blogs Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Speculative History Speculative History Forum - Alternate History, What If Questions, Pseudo History, and anything outside the boundaries of mainstream historical research

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 8th, 2012, 11:46 PM   #21

Petyo's Avatar
Joined: May 2011
From: Bulgaria
Posts: 832

Originally Posted by infestør View Post
the ones that have the significant number of the population that knows how to farm. oh also, arable land is a requirement
This one.
Most nations will survive. Only small ones like Taiwan, which relies on technology and industry will vanish. With population density of over 600/sq. km they simply don't have enough land to feed themselves and will have no other goods to export in exchange of food.
Petyo is offline  
Remove Ads
Old November 9th, 2012, 12:05 AM   #22

Grimald's Avatar
Civilized Barbarian
Joined: Nov 2011
From: Hercynian Forest
Posts: 5,860

Originally Posted by Magnate View Post
So lets say that all the technology in the world disappeared and the humans had to start all over again.

Which nation would survive the best?

Which nation would become the new superpower based on population/ natural resources etc etc?
I haven't quite understood the scenario. Do you mean that only the physical technology would disappear, e.g. cars, tools, machines, buildings, streets, and so on - or also the knowledge about this technology? If it is only the physical objects, then I am sure that after a short, but hard period of adaptation, we would see a similar pattern of development as we have now.

In my opinion, it is mainly the intellectual ressources that determine the wealth of a country. Maybe I have to emphasize that I don't mean that in a racist way; it is just a matter of cultural evolution which is in principle open to all human beings.
Grimald is offline  
Old November 9th, 2012, 06:07 AM   #23

xander.XVII's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2009
From: Outer world
Posts: 3,701

Just see Abrams' and Kripke's tv series "Revolution".
xander.XVII is offline  
Old November 9th, 2012, 07:05 AM   #24

infestør's Avatar
Surprise pølse!
Joined: Jan 2012
From: localhost
Posts: 3,881
Blog Entries: 3

after this doomsday scenario happens the farmers will look up and say: "y'all made fun of us! who is laughing now, huh?!"
infestør is offline  
Old November 10th, 2012, 10:48 PM   #25

harbinger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 719

Areas with fertile river valleys to support a large population,urban centres would be reduced to nothing due to lack of food garins coming from the hinterland to support them.
harbinger is offline  
Old November 11th, 2012, 11:36 AM   #26

lee909's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2009
From: Watford
Posts: 62

India or China imo.
They have huge populations to work the fields.Most farm work is still done by human and animal labour anyway.
lee909 is offline  
Old November 11th, 2012, 02:23 PM   #27

Crystal Rainbow's Avatar
The Good Knight
Joined: Feb 2011
From: Cumbernauld Scotland
Posts: 9,998
Blog Entries: 51

Originally Posted by Magnate View Post
So lets say that all the technology in the world disappeared and the humans had to start all over again.

Which nation would survive the best?

Which nation would become the new superpower based on population/ natural resources etc etc?
If we had no need for material wealth, like we had at the beginning civilization I would think it would be tribes that still work in harmony with the earth and respect mother nature.
Crystal Rainbow is offline  
Old November 11th, 2012, 02:25 PM   #28

Tlacaelel's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2012
From: Foundations of Heaven
Posts: 75

I think that the least technologically advanced (according to Western standards) nations would have more probability to survive because they do not rely on a highly specialized economy which I think is sluggier in adapting to conditions that they already surpassed and have taken as given.

I would say Amazonians or a small "undeveloped" nation. E.g. São Tomé and Príncipe
Tlacaelel is offline  
Old November 11th, 2012, 02:45 PM   #29

The merchant of Venice's Avatar
Lazy mediterranean
Joined: Jul 2012
From: .
Posts: 3,404

New zealand - big for it's tiny population, and a lot of space for sheeps
The merchant of Venice is offline  
Old November 12th, 2012, 03:23 AM   #30

Tairusiano's Avatar
Skull collector
Joined: Jun 2012
From: Brazil
Posts: 2,746
Blog Entries: 7

A big space for agriculture is necessary but plant's take some time to grow and to provide food and you need to eat every day, in this scenario i think nations cease to exist without tecnology they can not prevent chaos, a easy way of surviving will be fishing, rivers provide imediate source for food hunting and gathering(but this will exhaust the food suply of the region)in the beginning of this apocalypse little groups
will have more chance to survive, when agriculture develop oh yes larger groups will emerge.

people with a certain knowlodge in surviving will do well
farmers, fishers, and tribal societies
the great menance will be the own man, defending the sources of food's our conquering them will be part of this armageddon

Last edited by Tairusiano; November 12th, 2012 at 04:23 AM.
Tairusiano is offline  

  Historum > Themes in History > Speculative History

nation, survive, technology

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dinosaurs Survive ? PADDYBOY Speculative History 113 March 12th, 2017 02:43 PM
Has any nation ever deserved to be ruled by another nation? sylla1 General History 325 October 12th, 2015 10:23 PM
A nation cannot survive treason: Cicero Thessalonian Philosophy, Political Science, and Sociology 3 August 13th, 2011 03:00 PM
How to Survive Under Siege Historius War and Military History 13 February 15th, 2011 02:35 PM
Will Monarchy survive? Kiwi Speculative History 15 November 6th, 2009 12:16 AM

Copyright © 2006-2013 Historum. All rights reserved.